Posted on 07/04/2023 3:52:33 AM PDT by Libloather
…the “harms” caused by “the disproportionate amount of African Americans who are burdened with child support debt.”…
************************************************************************
Jeez… WTH to start. If ANY person is responsible for a child being conceived, THAT person is financially responsible for that child until it reaches adulthood. Garnishment of wages and other benefits or assets for child support (or for repayment of government expenses that are due to lack payment of child support) should be mandatory. This includes all pensions and retirement benefits.
So it screws taxpayers and removes a major incentive for black fathers to pay child support on time?
How about just eliminate any responsibility from blacks altogether, as the Democrats in Cali seem to think they are completely incompetent of anything except casting a democrat vote. I mean, y’all do what you want to, but do it with your own money, not a dime of US taxpayer’s money. Do it right and soon y’all will have all of them. Won’t that be grand?
birth control is your friend if you don’t want kids you have to support. If you have them, feed them.
black
It’s the definition of insanity to me.
Rename it to the Shakedown Committee.
The Hillary Clinton/Janet Reno smell is strong on this.
Correct, no boundaries whatsoever.
But really there's no point in picking apart the outrageous demands. It's just a way to get riled up in preparation for next year's presidential election.
I could foresee a problem with this: by the time they determine who the daddy is, they’d all be in nursing homes anyway.
Wonder why people from other countries that were enslaved by Rome aren’t asking for Reparations?.
“...fathers to pay child support on time?”
You got it!! Oh, they still have to pay it...legally. Just without the liability of all the back interest of the state spending taxpayer money to service the lack of previously not paying it. And if the father doesn’t wish to pay anything in the future, then at some point the state will write off the interest again because they feel it is uncollectable. So I guess the next question is that the state should stay out of it and not try to get their piece of the action as isn’t it a lost cause?
In California, consistent failure to pay child support can result in a felony charge. This is when the parent who should be paying support owes more than $2,500 in back payments. But if they already have that amount in debt as that is not a lot of money and they are being forgiven for the state part, does anyone have the idea that the police are going to start an investigation to find the guy even for a felony? This is where opposites become the same: fat chance/slim chance
wy69
As they continue the moral corruption, payoffs, division of the people and tainted allegiances to their positions and work.
“...allegiances to their positions and work.”
Yep and they consider it a fair days work for a fair days wage so the state can get their piece of the action. Welcome to California government.
wy69
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.