Not everyone has time to lord it over a thread, or to monitor against wrongspeak. Most of us have lives lived in three dimensions, which require active participation and minimize time available for your suggestion.
Oh be real the same time and effort used to post insults and devision would be more than enough to post your own thread. Time spent posting would likely be far less on a thread devoted to you and others ideas.
:: Most of us have lives lived in three dimensions, which require active participation and minimize time available for your suggestion.::
~~~~~~~~~~~
Not recently, but I have posted quite a few threads to FR. Nothing like ransomnote’s incredible productions, of course.
I can tell you that posting a thread would be much less time-consuming than scanning the Q Threads and composing long, snarky comments to others. I think the 3 or so people who want to post certain content on this thread that is deemed objectionable by ransomnote should feel free to start their own thread(s). But I guess they prefer to hang around and stink up this thread. It is truly tiresome.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 06/13/2023 Vol.462, Q Day 2055, nclaurel wrote: |
I still wonder what stops people from starting their own thread for discussions that Ransomnote and others don’t want on a Q thread. The leftist media and social platforms don’t offer that option so there is really no comparison. |
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 06/13/2023 Vol.462, Q Day 2055, SheepWhisperer wrote: |
Not everyone has time to lord it over a thread, or to monitor against wrongspeak. Most of us have lives lived in three dimensions, which require active participation and minimize time available for your suggestion. |
Have you thought about posting your thread and not lording over it or monitoring against wrongspeak? Posting that would take about 5 mniutes - even three dimensional people probably have 5 minutes.