Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/18/2023 4:20:29 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Pathetic all around: https://nypost.com/2023/05/18/elena-kagan-sonia-sotomayor-trade-jabs-in-andy-warhol-case/


2 posted on 05/18/2023 4:21:05 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

A dog fight.


3 posted on 05/18/2023 4:23:08 PM PDT by Trump_Triumphant ("Our hearts are restless, Oh Lord, until they rest in thee"- St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Sounds like a judicial bitchslapping to me


5 posted on 05/18/2023 4:31:12 PM PDT by Brandonmark (November 2024 cannot come soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

This kind of garbage is why SCOTUS is “too busy” to see 1st and 2nd amendment cases???


6 posted on 05/18/2023 4:40:27 PM PDT by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

They should both just shut up, and go make sandwiches for Justice Thomas.


7 posted on 05/18/2023 4:54:56 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

I’ll buy the mud...


8 posted on 05/18/2023 4:54:59 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is the next Sam Adams when we so desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Interesting grouping.


9 posted on 05/18/2023 5:01:55 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Wonder if Warhol would have been in favor of mutilating children’s sex organs?


11 posted on 05/18/2023 5:09:47 PM PDT by Leep (Hillary will NEVER be president! 😁)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

The country is going to hell, they won’t take important cases but this is what they quibble about? Some stupid copyright case involving a guy who’s been dead for 36 years? Bunch of fools.


12 posted on 05/18/2023 5:23:33 PM PDT by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

15 posted on 05/18/2023 5:52:08 PM PDT by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Could Campbell’s Soup sue the Warhol estate?


18 posted on 05/18/2023 6:08:16 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Good Lord - Kagan and Roberts are RETARDS.

So basically - Goldsmith photographed Prince back in 1981 and, back in 1981, Andy Warhol paid her $10k to use the photograph as the basis for a painting to be published, one time, in another magazine.

Almost 40 years later, after Prince died, Conde Nast asked the Warhol foundation to reprint the painting and paid the Warhol foundation for its use. Neither Conde Nast nor AWF consulted Goldsmith for permission to do so.

Kagan AND ROBERTS here claim that the painting was an original work and thus no need to pay Goldsmith anymore.

EXCEPT that’s not what the original contract stated - Warhol paid for a ONE TIME license for ONE publication and Kagan and Roberts basically wave that away because... “art”.

It’s BS and both of these, so-called, judges obviously have no understanding of law and should RESIGN IMMEDIATELY.


20 posted on 05/18/2023 6:11:52 PM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

21 posted on 05/18/2023 6:16:20 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy ( Dementia Joe is Not My President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Sotomayor has shown some shocking independence lately. Good on her.


27 posted on 05/18/2023 6:59:47 PM PDT by JusPasenThru (ESG is a hunting license on Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

5 unelected, unaccountable megalomaniacs collude together to decide the most pressing issues of the day with no input whatsoever from the voters or their representatives. In a country of 350 million, we have 5 people deciding the law, and creating law from the bench. That is not a democracy and it is not a republic folks. It is not what the Founders intended.

Congress passes a law banning fag marriage and the President signs it? TOO BAD! FAGGOTT ANTHONY KENNEDY SAYS YOU GET FAG MARRIAGE ANYWAY!

Just one example of how insane this system is.


28 posted on 05/18/2023 7:06:26 PM PDT by imabadboy99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Interesting. So, it looks like a 7-2 decision, with Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Sotomayor, and Jackson in the majority and Kagan and Roberts in the minority.


29 posted on 05/18/2023 7:34:43 PM PDT by TBP (Decent people cannot fathom the amoral cruelty of the Biden regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Ladies, ladies, ladies.

Nobody really wants to see Kagan and Sotomayor mud wrestle.

(Justice Barrett, maybe.)


30 posted on 05/18/2023 7:35:55 PM PDT by TBP (Decent people cannot fathom the amoral cruelty of the Biden regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

I wonder if the roots of this rift have anything to do with the Roe v Wade leak…?


31 posted on 05/18/2023 7:38:07 PM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson