Your argument is that the reporterette just knew it because engineering? Come on.
I could tell you about the civil engineer on the phone during the event, talking about the other two buildings, who predicted
—that they would fall
—how they would fall
—in what order they would fall
—and the deleterious effect the fall(s) would have on surrounding structures
—that other buildings in the area, if not destroyed by falling fiery debris, would have to be demolished anyway
— all while they were both standing and smoking.
But of course such an engineer would be in the pay of the Paymasters, amirite?
She probably just flubbed the talk. Keep in mind 2 things:
1 - the British press was talking to smart people and predicted the collapse of the towers well in advance
2 - on scene reporters are mostly just saying what their producer (either in the ear piece while filming, or on the phone before) tell them to. TV likes to create the illusion that on scene reporters are talking about info they have because they’re there. But it’s not true.
So more than likely the same smart people that predicted the collapses of 1 and 2 told the producer 7 was doomed. They told her, and she either misheard or misspoke.
Cause really, if it was a conspiracy and they’d handed out the “script” to the international press don’t you think somebody by now would have written their tell all book? That script could make somebody very rich.