Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CheshireTheCat

Yeah, I didn’t say it would be easy. What with the medico quacks blaming deaths on anything but the clotshots the insurance guys will have to re-figure the odds of a particular death in new ways. To get a policy they might make one certify he/she/it did not get a clot shot, for instance. The only way the problem will ever get to regulators is if a gummint agency actually acknowledges clotshots might be fatal.


425 posted on 04/01/2023 2:25:41 PM PDT by OldWarBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies ]


To: OldWarBaby

Since the odds of one being vax-injured increase by the number of vaxseems one took and so many people were given the choice of getting a vaxseem or getting fired, a compromise could be reached based on number of vasxeems taken.

A lot of employers who forced the mandate over the first round didn’t make their employees get boosters.

Perhaps insurance regulators could allow insurance companies to enact a huge premium hike for people who got anything more than the first round.

I think it would be easy for insurance companies to force government to come clean. I don’t think government can pay them off without someone noticing.

Insurance companies have the data to force the issue. “Acme Insurance” issues group policies for companies A and B. Both are in the same industry and similar size. Company A had a strict vaxseem mandate for employees. Company B had none.

Company A has had x% more employees die and go out on disability.


429 posted on 04/01/2023 2:53:25 PM PDT by CheshireTheCat ("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson