Since the odds of one being vax-injured increase by the number of vaxseems one took and so many people were given the choice of getting a vaxseem or getting fired, a compromise could be reached based on number of vasxeems taken.
A lot of employers who forced the mandate over the first round didn’t make their employees get boosters.
Perhaps insurance regulators could allow insurance companies to enact a huge premium hike for people who got anything more than the first round.
I think it would be easy for insurance companies to force government to come clean. I don’t think government can pay them off without someone noticing.
Insurance companies have the data to force the issue. “Acme Insurance” issues group policies for companies A and B. Both are in the same industry and similar size. Company A had a strict vaxseem mandate for employees. Company B had none.
Company A has had x% more employees die and go out on disability.
As I noted earlier-—the insurance companies have helluva more mathematical capability than anyone anywhere in the gummint. They will shortly figger out the performance of Co’s A and B.
Way back in my school years I well remember it was the insurance guys who were trolling for math whizzes.
The mix of shots/boosters/mandates/placebos is what makes the math hard. That’s most of the reason I lean toward expecting the insurance guys to “rule” or “exclude” their way thru the problem. That’s likely to happen way before anyone in gummint admits a problem.
Liberty Forge
April 1, 2023 5:58 pm
6-minute YouTube video, which explores the reason for increased train derailments:
“We Discovered Why Trains Keep Derailing”