“This is what I expect soon. Because the clotshot odds will be so hard to figger they will refuse to pay if cause of death is shot related. Or they might put in an exclusion as with seweecide: you will have to live six years after issuance for the clotshot exclusion to be waved.”
I don’t see how this could work. It might take too much work to make it work.
Insurance companies would have make the family of anyone young who died of a heart attack, PE, strange cancer for their age or fast growing cancer, or a number of other things I’m missing pay for an autopsy to prove it wasn’t the vaccine.
I’m not sure state regulators would go for this.
When you think about it, just about anything a 40-year old dies of, unless it’s something like falling off a ladder, could be argued to be vaxseem related by an insurance company attorney.
Even a person who developed kidney disease five years ago could have progression of it caused by the vaxseem.
When you think about it, just about anything a 40-year old dies of, unless it’s something like falling off a ladder, could be argued to be vaxseem related by an insurance company attorney.
_____________________________________________________
Well that will put governments and health authorities between a rock and a very hard place. You’ll have insurance companies desperately trying to disqualify policy payouts due to vaccine injury and vaccine pushers trying to convince everyone that they’re safe and not the COD. Two goliaths trying to prove the other is lying is a fight I’d very much enjoy watching.
If the health and government authorities decide there’s too much at stake to allow the insurance companies to prove their case in the courts, it wouldn’t be beyond the former to give a huge chunk of money to the insurance companies to cover their losses and make the question of fault simply go away.
Yeah, I didn’t say it would be easy. What with the medico quacks blaming deaths on anything but the clotshots the insurance guys will have to re-figure the odds of a particular death in new ways. To get a policy they might make one certify he/she/it did not get a clot shot, for instance. The only way the problem will ever get to regulators is if a gummint agency actually acknowledges clotshots might be fatal.
re insurance companies payout
```````
Fraud makes the gubmermint responsible?
Looks like a bailout in the making.