Posted on 03/23/2023 3:58:52 AM PDT by EBH
Are we not simply seeing the Really Big ones gobbling up the slightly smaller banks, until only maybe ten remain, globally. And those ten CAN be bailed out with fiat paper? (Which quickly becomes digital and all THAT comes with...)
No?
Walmart posted many inflation signals.
Multiple listing services posted many signs of inflation.
Banks should try to align loan and deposit maturities.
Tipping point, anyone?
Prepare for barter, including voluntary servitude.
There is a massive difference between 2008 - where capital bases eroded due to credit losses on either CMBS or residential mortgage loans - and 2023 where a handful of banks failed to accurately duration-match their assets and liabilities.
In addition, in 2008 the largest banks in the US were FORCED to take "bailout money." The closest thing to that in 2023 is what appears to be a quasi-managed rescue of First Republic.
Any article on banking where the chief Authority is a sociologist from UC Berkeley pushing a book he wrote, is highly suspect. But in this current environment, Deplorables seem to lap up the MSM, academics, and cranks from the left coasts. We may as well be DU.
That is very misleading.
The value of an investment grade bond at maturity does not lose value.
The bond value declines ONLY if you try to sell it BEFORE it reaches maturity, and quite often, in recent years, the pre-maturity value of long dated bonds INCREASED when interest rates were low or going down.
I have not seen ANY public information on bond portfolio duration for the banks that failed. "Duration" is the median amount of time before the entire bond portfolio matures.
I have seen zero hard data that the failed banks have substantially longer duration bonds than healthy banks.
To my eye, Silicon Valley Bank, specifically, was the victim of an old fashioned, pure panic, run on the bank.
What a relieve, I thought Sniffer ruined the economy.
Ruin the banks, ruin the economy, Institute Central Bank Digital Currency as the “answer” and control how we spend.
Actually, no they are not sound in the normal business sense.
A few weeks ago you heard Yellen talking about and trying to convince people their accounts are “safe.” Heck they even strutted out Biden to ‘assure’ the masses. LOL.
Now they are just being ‘forced’ to take on the failing banks.
Nothing to see or understand here because it looks different from 2008 and even the 1930 mortgage crisis.
Uh??? SVB failed because they had to sell those bonds early at a loss of 0.75 on the dollar. Did you miss that part?
Let me get this straight. The Bidenomics policies flood the markets with cash in a supply-contrained economy with nascent inflation. Inflation takes off, with the logical response being increasing interest rates. Despite supply issues not being resolved, they flood even more money into the economy, worsening inflation yet again. The rising rates - indeed even a record-duration inverted yield curve - cause the value of long-term bonds to decline precipitously. This, of course, breaks the bank model of income spread - profiting from the normal spread between short term rates paid on deposits and long-term rates earned on those deposits. Of course they have liquidity problems as a result!
But according to this Time piece, this is all the fault of the banks. Sounds like rubbish to me. More likely a story planted by this incompetent administration to shift the blame.
From memory, the loss was roughly 1% of total deposits.
The bank reported a $1.5 billion profit in 2022 to the SEC, just six weeks before the collapse.
We have ZERO public information about ANY non-performing loans at SBV.
If the SVB loan portfolio is sound, then, the bank was destroyed by panicked depositors.
Complete BS. It was caused by the federal government requiring banks to make home loans to anybody who had a pulse, regardless of employment, credit history, or means to repay. Just like the same federal government caused the current crisis by printing $5 trillion “COVID Bucks” out of thin air which ignited inflation forcing the fed to raise interest rates making pre-maturity bonds worth a lot less.
Congress needs to admit previous mistakes and pass some regulation bills again.
Cui bono? Yeah, that's the one.
” the Fed projected that it wouldn’t stop heightening rates until they topped 4.5% “
Heightening?
Great writing skills. The word is “highifying”, you morons. Or “uppifying”.
Sheesh.
Of course, the FED, FDIC, TREASURY, and KPMG auditors saw nothing wrong with the books of SVB and other banks during the past year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.