Has anyone gotten more specific info about the content of the posters?
Asking for a friend. LOL.
If you go to the article and click on the “forced to remove her Facebook post” link at the beginning, the link takes you to a 55 page document. The document starts with the Facebook post (including an image of the fairly innocent hallway poster) and continues through all the subsequent emails, etc. as discussed.
I went to the website and followed the link to the documents being used in the suit.
There is a photo of a poster. The poster features drawings of various colored “flags” representing various sexual aberrations. I didn’t even know they had their own flags.
Among those represented: gender fluid, lesbian, pansexual, polysexual. There are 12 more!
The poster is very poorly done, sloppy and looks as if a 6-year-old had done it. There are imperative sentences such as “Don’t be ashamed of who you are” and “Be you.” One sentence has the word “different” misspelled.
There is nothing graphically referring to the sex act, but this poster is presenting concepts to prepubescent children that should not be entering their minds at this stage in life. But, of course, we know the perverts want to introduce children to such concepts early so that they can groom them.
This mother is very reasoned and kind in the criticism that she levels against the poster. Basically, she is saying that it’s okay for people to engage in their perversions but that these children are too young to be exposed to these ideas.
Looks to me like they wanted to shut her down because she is on to their game and was alerting other parents. I am very disappointed that other parents did not descend upon that school en masse.