Posted on 01/22/2023 1:00:10 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Mark Twain is often misattributed as saying, “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” The sentiment is definitely Twainesque, but he never said it. Nevertheless, it’s still true and demonstrable time and again in our post-truth society.
As more “normies” have started waking up to the reality that the Covid-19 “vaccines” are ineffective and dangerous, a lot are finding news way of defending their decisions to get jabbed rather than admitting it was a mistake. Conservative comic Scott Adams, who is most famous for creating the Dilbert comics, is not one of those people. He’s now admitting that “anti-vaxxers won” in regards to their decision.
In fact, he admitted it over and over again. Watch:
(Excerpt) Read more at youtu.be ...
I agree with posters who say that it's not about winning and losing, but about being right. The benefit of being right is good health and a sense of vindication. However, from beginning to end, people treat you like a criminal for simply exercising your judgment and not going with the herd. Perhaps the only group who values contrarians are people in the investment community. That is because their money is on the line.
Scott also errs in his terminology. I think most people who refused the mRNA vaccine were not “anti-vaxxers” generally. They simply opposed an experimental vaccine whose safety and efficacy profile were unknown. And maybe they resisted the hard-sell and the outright coercion.
There was a video on the Epoch times. The doctor said he changed his position, from pro-vax, because the evidence changed. He was semi-gracious in saying others got the right position sooner through intuition. Nice face-saving move, but I am unpersuaded. Dr. Gold, for one, had the right position early due to experience and research.
CDC what a joke. The Center for Damage Control.
Currently it’s THREE LONG YEARS !
The hospitals were reporting that patients hospitalized for all causes were being reported as being there for Covid to get the gubmint dough.
My friend took his wife to the hospital for outpatient treatement. They wheeled her to the Covid floor when her test positive (over 98% false positive because they set the PCR rata at 47), even though she didn’t have it. I heard reports that they were intubating people without breathing problems and giving them Remdisivir, which causes the lungs to retain fluids. The only drug Fauci allowed. Killed a lot of people. Had to keep those numbers up, plus they got extra money
He went up and took her home.
The more important fact is that the fake vaxes are not vaxes and they do not work.
All this other crap about hospitalization is just to take people off the main point that they do not work and are unsafe for too many people. We do not know yet the damage ahead from these jabs. The were untested and when tried on lab critters, the critters all died.
There is no way to justify continuing with a product that does not work If they did and they were proven safe, we would not be talking about this issue.
I originally said “ My Body My Choice “
and ain’t had the flu since
Thanks Giving 2019.
.
Knock on wood
“...the grifter McCullough...”
That’s a lot of decades of top-flight professionalism and utter, unparalleled success in his chosen (exclusive) field to put up on the scoreboard, only to be summarily kneecapped by someone who’s admittedly lost half his/her mojo.
Do your unvaccinated include the no longer “up to date”.
Weird the CDC doesn't track natural immunity, but tries to sell bivalent boosters instead.
If Unvaccinated natural immunity was worse than vaccinated immunity, seems that would be a huge selling point for the new clot shots.
We can infer it isn't.
You apparently done know where funding for the CDC comes from.
Hint: It’s not all government
Nice chart, but is the timing right? The chart ends in 2020. When were the shots rolled out?
Most ‘Vaccinated’ Japan Brought to its Knees by Covid: Most Hospitalizations and Deaths - RAIR
What is an acute-care hospital? HospitalView tracks over 7300 hospitals divided into 9 different types and the COVID-NET monitors 300 to determine their data? Please, just stop.
That wouldn't change the proportion of vaccinated/unvaccinated who were hospitalized.
The CDC has no credibility left. Trusting anything they have produced is foolish without a LOT of cross-checking using other sources.
There are many, many other studies from health systems all over the world showing the Covid vaccines are very effective in reducing hospitalizations and death.
Click the link I provided.
Different levels of vaccination provide different levels of advantage vs. the unvaccinated.
Wouldn't the unvaccinated natural immunity folks be included in the unvaccinated category?
If natural immunity was better than vaccination that would mean the other unvaccinated fared even worse vs. the vaccinated.
Most will never admit they were hoodwinked into taking a kill shot while smugly belittling anyone who refused as a conspiracy theorist.
I believe you that that’s what the CDC says.
I don’t trust the data collection system in this case, nor do I trust the CDC to honestly present the data.
You should distrust the CDC.
“...fared even worse.. “
Not long term.
“Fully vaccinated” individuals not vexxationated within the same health system as the hospital were coded as “unvaccinated”.
So there’s that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.