So I am impressed only by those studies that are meant to figure out what is actually true. The FIRST thing such a study would do is compare rates between three different times. Before covid 19. During covid 19 but before jabs. After covid 19 with jabs. The only reason to AVOID this easy amd blatantly obvious approach is if one does not want to determine what is true but instead is doing propaganda to rationalize a failed hypothesis that those funding the study want pushed.
AndyTheBear wrote: “So I am impressed only by those studies that are meant to figure out what is actually true. The FIRST thing such a study would do is compare rates between three different times. Before covid 19. During covid 19 but before jabs. After covid 19 with jabs. The only reason to AVOID this easy amd blatantly obvious approach is if one does not want to determine what is true but instead is doing propaganda to rationalize a failed hypothesis that those funding the study want pushed.”
If the question is whether COVID causes more instances than the vaccine, there is no reason to compile data before COVID and before the vaccines. And, that is exactly what this study does when it compares those cases of vaccinated and unvaccinated.