DugwayDuke wrote: “Myocarditis is far more likely to be caused by COVID than by the vaccine.”
fireman15 wrote: “Except that there even with this massive increase in Myocarditis there is not even one study that show that in the unvaxxed there is any increase at all. And this increase in myocarditis has not been noted in countries with low vaccination rates.”
Oh, but there is such a study, a study that compares myocarditis in the vaccinated and in those who have had COVID.
- The detailed analysis of nearly 43 million people was published Monday in the American Heart Association journal Circulation.
- “We found that across this large dataset, the entire COVID-19-vaccinated population of England during an important 12-month period of the pandemic when the COVID-19 vaccines first became available, the risk of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination was quite small compared to the risk of myocarditis after COVID-19 infection,” the study’s lead author, Martina Patone, said in a news release. She is a statistician at the University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences in England.”
So I am impressed only by those studies that are meant to figure out what is actually true. The FIRST thing such a study would do is compare rates between three different times. Before covid 19. During covid 19 but before jabs. After covid 19 with jabs. The only reason to AVOID this easy amd blatantly obvious approach is if one does not want to determine what is true but instead is doing propaganda to rationalize a failed hypothesis that those funding the study want pushed.
It is difficult to even know where to start on this one. Suffice it to say that there are glaring issues with the way the article you linked to is written. First, there is no link to the actual study within the article. Second, quoting from the article, “The detailed analysis of nearly 43 million people was published Monday in the American Heart Association journal Circulation.” What “details are they speaking of.
3rd “during an important 12-month period of the pandemic when the COVID-19 vaccines first became available” Why not just name the 12 month period? Could it be that the data was collected so long ago that it is no longer statistically significant? And why is the American Heart Association relying on outdated foreign metadata?
This is an outdated worthless metadata supported piece of gobblygoo published to confuse people and the issues with no links to the actual study that supposedly shows something that actually does not.
American Heart Association is not a reliable source. They are in bed with Pharma and aligned with fedgov’s disastrous dietary recommendations.
The association of cv19 with myocarditis is minimal to zero. Pfizer’s own trial docs warn of the issue. And the most recent study of ~700,000 ppl said no association between natural infection and myocarditis. And that is without even accounting for the availability (since May 2020) of early treatment protocols.
We know what you represent, and that is Pharma, the “fact checkers”, Biden and the swamp.