Posted on 12/22/2022 11:53:10 AM PST by Red Badger
Bttt.
5.56mm
That’s nice. Voter fraud is only an issue if the wrong person wins.
People need to know, the GOPe is very happy with the result.
In a honorable world, a judge would rule the election invalid and kick it over to the state legislature to remedy.
In the interim, the present state government would be left in place EXCEPT for those who have offices that involve elections. Those should be removed from office in the interim.
No matter who wins or doesn’t win this trial, it doesn’t matter. It won’t end until SCOTUS.
NO it has to be in remedy NOW..before the next state government is sworn.
If this judge rules like he should, then the swearing in of the next state government is held up..or should be.
Neither side is going to accept the ruling.
Kari has vowed to take it all the way to SCOTUS.
And if SCOTUS won't hear it, then Kari needs to start a RECALL HOBBS campaign. Force the bastards to do a re-do, and see if they still print out 19 inch ballots on 20 inch paper...
I have more confidence I’ll see better results with a scratch-and-win ticket than with an election these days.
You are aware that there is precedent for this right in this state? Or havent you researched it?
The very first governor lost to another in about 1916 and that person was removed from office.
Why do these big blockbuster stories usually just go away? Puts me in mind of a frequent poster on FR.
“No matter how this judge rules, it will go to the AZ Supreme Court.”
Right, and that court has to bring that case ASAP.
We may see the court legislate from the bench here.
I can see the headline now:
“JUDGE DISMISSES LAKE LAWSUIT WITHOUT COMMENT OR EXPLANATION”
Yep I know......I’m a Debbie downer
This corruption in AZ is a microcosm of elections in the entire nation.
Bookmark
Typical Communist Democrat, threats of jailing people who do not comply and obey their every order...Spit*
The verdict should be one of two - declare Lake the winner or have another election.
Problem is no matter how much damning evidence there is they have to PROVE it happened through intent as opposed to mere incompetence
That’s the reality of it at least in this court. The judge was clear about that. This is why the defense ends cross examination with the same question: Do you have evidence this was done intentionally or do you have evidence of a fraudulent ballot.
Not in a legitimate court of law. One or two mistakes/errors could be overlooked or deemed incompetence. A conga line of alleged errors or mistakes? No way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.