The following insight also makes sense for the US SC. It seems to follows the same line of thought leading toward a secondary action by another agency, or voters themselves to issue more serious consequences.
~~~~~~
~~~~~~
” I’m seeing a number of Patriots miss the memo on the
Brunson case. The Brunsons are phenomenal people,
W/out question.
But the case doesn’t have the clout many Patriots hope.
> It cannot reward Trump a victory
> It CAN find Congress in contempt of US Law for violating the Legal Process in the appointment of a
new gov’t, and give grounds for their removal; but cannot provide other corrections now ~needed~ by
our Country.
The SC cannot intervene in US elections after legal
deadlines have passed. “
👉 RealSGAnon
Notes on the Twitter Files, cont’d | Power Line (powerlineblog.com)
That line of logic fails to consider the fact that the SC has already stated in prior cases that fraud vitiates everything...therefore while they cannot install Trump they can rescind the results of the election and uninstall the P/VP until the appropriate investigations have been completed then using the constitutional list of replacements as the next in line...which goes to the speaker of the house.