| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 11/20/2022 Vol.435, Q Day 1849, RitaOK wrote: |
You know, I really have no anwer. Indications are that MIL seem to be showing up in Brazil. I believe the MIL of Brazil saw Days and Days of dense multitudes, of what looked like a million Brazilians, keep gathering around that whatever-building and MIL were convinced they could keep the support of the people by acting. How it turns out, we will have to see. I’m propagandized enough by now that I this is all Info War.
No guns. Maybe missiles or a nuke, but MIL is basically used more to audit or re-audit elections, to reveal secrets, but to let everyone be hit hard enough, long enough, that even the the stupid people of the Left will join us in our townsquares. MIL will act when they see us Engage. We are not hit hard enough that they yet see a people worth risking THEIR ALL for. Not yet. |
"We’re fat, fed and warm, sacrificing nothing for their cause, mostly preening about our brilliance, the substacks we prefer, and what we think we “know”. 🧐
(Self included.)"
Now that Thanks Giving is over, I guess it's time (again) for you to ridicule Q thread participants, many of whom have been volunteering in the pivotal information war for up to 5 years, for doing 'nothing'. They've sacrificed time with family or pursuits more pleasant than investigating unthinkable horror.
If there were no information war, or if it existed but wasn't important, then why has Q and Q+ kept us focused on it for years? TO reduce the chances of Civil War, maybe? To impede Deep Staters used to a sleeping public?
Why are you here, Rita? Shouldn't you stay off the Q threads in order to help the Brazilians?
You don't know how the rest of spend our time. It's likely most are here to contribute to the information war and reduce the damage done when the military steps in, because the military is the only way.
I understand that you don't believe there's a relevant information war, having read your post today and some of your prior posts. Otherwise how could you post that our military won't consider us, or their country, worth fighting for unless we go into the 'town square'?
The Deep State utilized the 'town square' protests to overthrow the Ukraine. They put protesters in the town square and had black hats fire upon them from buildings lining the town square. They blamed the shooting on protesters and took control of the public ever after. Some believe Richmond, Virginia protests were being set up the same way, with a 'kill pen' and operatives waiting to act.
Trump kept us out of the town square so that the instigators, MSM ghouls and their handlers could not trigger gun grabs, arrests, UN 'peacekeepers' etc. Probably many remember the fake protesters near the White House, courtesy of the FBI; the ones 'in costume' to blend in with MAGA, except MAGA didn't show up and they were exposed instead.
You are in a position to know that the storm is almost upon us, Trump is signaling on Truth Social he is Q+ and that he intends to fight to the death for freedom. Q recently signaled that we are to focus, FOCUS. So these signs indicated to you that 'we' should ridiculed into abandoning our posts in the information war and focus on Brazil instead?
You say, "mil will act when they see us engaged" but most on the Q thread are already engaged and have been for years. The rest are here to learn/share more and a few are here to demoralize.
Are we sacrificing something more than apart from freedom to remain in the proverbial sense of “fat, fed and warm” while typing at will?
I certainly included myself in my own critique, lording myself over No One,and always “speaking for myself”.
Blowing past my point seems your forte; 1) that Americans are suffering little to nothing (compared to EU, for only one example); and 2) that “YET” means that when you DO become affected, things will Change, and Americans will react as a united people (off our netherregion and in the town squares); and 3) that the MIL will see a people gathered behind them, enough to risk themselves.
Is there some problem with expressing a “belief”, that you and your other thought monitor should take only what I say, so personally?
If less is more, and info-warfare is Cost Free, but very “educational and informational”, then perhaps we could do even Less— for the war effort. Think how much smarter we will be.
"Why are you here, Rita?"
---------------------------------
I'm guessing that she took these statements seriously, as did I.
👇
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
I think WE ARE HERE. When did certain members of this group become so authoritarian and determined to control the narrative?
👇
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
I read this to mean that we don't all have to think alike (group think), as long as we are all invested in the end goal. Apparently, Rita and I misread it because we want to think for ourselves. That is not compatible with the mindset going around that flames or criticizes HOW we think and WHAT we think if it doesn't parrot the "group think" of certain "cliches" in here.
I have every intention of supporting Q and President Trump, but I will do it MY way. And no, nobody is taking away my bee. ROTFL
I will never harass, flame, or tell anybody they are wrong for not believing the same way I do. I'm not so egotistical that I think I'm always right.
I will make up my own mind. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong, but I will exercise my right to be wrong.
The only demoralization I see lately is from certain people/groups demoralizing people that don't think in lockstep the same way they do.
IMO, the main thing that matters, that keeps us plugging for the same goal, is that it's OK to think as individuals, right or wrong. Where did the above mission statement go so wrong to the point that we aren't encouraged to think for ourselves without fear of being flamed?
Well, flame on!
👍 to you Rita! I, for one, appreciate your thoughts on all of it.