How can people accept that someone who can’t even understand their natural gender would be able to understand how to legislate for America? That person has no business with power over others.
I will say this, up front.
This person should be called an ugly faggot to “its” face at every opportunity.
Now...I have always understood any -ism to necessarily be accompanied by some act that proves the label.
Otherwise, it is just bigotry and fully protected by the 1st Amendment.
To wit, a hiring manager tells an applicant, “We don’t hire Christians here” is clearly a prejudicial act as the Christian is being denied equal opportunity.
For a hiring manager to confide in a bar-buddy, “I don’t like hiring Christians for my employer.” is simply bigoted as no one is denied opportunity.
Racist?
Same thing.
I know that I am bigoted since I harbor pre-conceived opinions of others.
Would I deny anyone an opportunity that I might be able to provide for them?
Don’t know...I’m not tasked with handing out opportunities.
I do hold a bigoted position with the obviously, mentally challenged.
Like the politician mentioned.
Meanwhile, I have no opportunities to provide for this deluded freak.
Bigotry is STILL protected by the US Constitution.
See muh tagline.