Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sacajaweau; RummyChick

Just a theory (based on knowing a lot of cops & state troopers): Perhaps... perhaps... the police are being very careful NOT to use the names of high-profile individuals over monitored radio channels (even if encrypted).

I remember a big deal being made in the PA State Police about troopers using Nextel “push-to-talk” phones to communicate with fellow troopers rather than using monitored police radio nets. That was squashed quickly when it came to light.

I am not a police officer. Just making a generalization based on scuttlebutt in unconnected incidents.


80 posted on 11/04/2022 10:40:49 AM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Tallguy

I could see that being the case


81 posted on 11/04/2022 10:44:49 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy
I think the 9-11 operator is lying her/his *** off. That number would have provoked a high alert....

Remember...the operator said she/he turned up the volume so he/she could hear what's going on....Maybe...but sounds like there was some double tasking going on...first to the dudes who weren't watching the monitor...than to some higher up...then to the police...

88 posted on 11/04/2022 10:57:31 AM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson