Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court declines appeal by Texas death row inmate who said jury was racist
Washington Examiner ^ | October 11, 2022 12:17 PM | by Kaelan Deese, Supreme Court Reporter |

Posted on 10/11/2022 9:54:26 AM PDT by Red Badger

The Supreme Court declined to take up an appeal from a Texas death row inmate who claimed his case was not fairly decided because some members of the all-white jury were opposed to interracial marriage.

In an unsigned order, the high court denied the appeal by Andre Thomas, a black inmate who was convicted and sentenced to death in 2005 by a jury in Sherman, Texas, over the murder of his wife, who was white, their biracial son, and her daughter from a different relationship.

Three members of the all-white jury that convicted Thomas had previously expressed opposition to interracial marriage, according to his newest slate of attorneys. However, Thomas's original attorneys had argued he was not guilty by reason of insanity. Texas held that the defendant's condition was "voluntary" due to a prior history of drug abuse.

His previous attorneys also did not seek to remove the apparently biased jurors at the time, as is permitted under court rules.

In a 12-page dissent, the court's three Democratic-appointed Justices Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, and Sonia Sotomayor contended that the "errors in this case render Thomas’ death sentence not only unreliable, but unconstitutional."

"As a result, Thomas was convicted and sentenced to death by a jury that included three jurors who expressed bias against him," the liberal minority bloc wrote.

The high court's denial leaves in place a lower appeals court judgment and maintains Thomas's death sentence. He presently does not have an execution date.


TOPICS: Local News; Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: rovenstinez

They can put it in the same needle.

Kill two birds with one shot.....................


21 posted on 10/11/2022 10:58:26 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

But ok to have DC courts packed with Dems who openly hate Rep on juries?


22 posted on 10/11/2022 10:59:18 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pas

Totally.......................


23 posted on 10/11/2022 11:00:00 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Dennis Miller had a good line about those claiming not guilty by reason of insanity.
He said “Insane? Ok, so we’ll fry you in a clown suit.”


24 posted on 10/11/2022 11:00:35 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_A._Walls


25 posted on 10/11/2022 11:02:01 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

This guy truly is insane. One of my co-workers at a former job lived next to him and his roommate. They had some kind of argument and the next day he found a rattlesnake in his mailbox.....................


26 posted on 10/11/2022 11:04:04 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Comedian Jeff Wayne had a good line about those claiming multiple personalities. He said something along the lines of, “So he has 130 personalities, then we will hang the MFer 130 times! Have him talk it over amongst himself; somebodies A$$ is going out today!”


27 posted on 10/11/2022 12:38:23 PM PDT by ExTxMarine (Diversity is necessary; diverse points of views will not be tolerated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
This guy truly is insane. One of my co-workers at a former job lived next to him and his roommate. They had some kind of argument and the next day he found a rattlesnake in his mailbox.....................

I'd consider it a favor. Rattlesnake is damned good eatin'.

28 posted on 10/11/2022 12:40:30 PM PDT by Lazamataz (The firearms I own today, are the firearms I will die with. How I die will be up to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
No they didn’t. They expressed bias against interracial marriage. So what. everyone has an opinion. And most of us have minority opinions.

They should have picked me. I have a strong bias against ALL marriage, interracial or not.

JUST SAY NO TO WEDDINGS!

29 posted on 10/11/2022 12:42:17 PM PDT by Lazamataz (The firearms I own today, are the firearms I will die with. How I die will be up to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

ya too bad we dont have more jurors like that in this era...


30 posted on 10/11/2022 12:42:56 PM PDT by sit-rep ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah

that is true for 95% of the cases blacks cry racism on!!


31 posted on 10/11/2022 12:44:28 PM PDT by sit-rep ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Hang um High!!


32 posted on 10/11/2022 12:46:09 PM PDT by Osage Orange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTxMarine

Thant’s a solid stance. :)


33 posted on 10/11/2022 12:46:10 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: EEGator
Women suck at running things and decision making skills.

Whoa dude...my wife would highly disagree........but she would just smile and go on her way.

34 posted on 10/11/2022 12:50:17 PM PDT by Osage Orange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

N=1 is meaningless.

The 19th Amendment is the second worst mistake America ever made. (Slavery #1)


35 posted on 10/11/2022 12:52:38 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Wrong as always, its clear you hate women.. lol ..every thread you post the 19th Amendment drivel.. . its the 17th Amendment that has to go!


36 posted on 10/11/2022 2:25:31 PM PDT by Article10 (Roger That)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Article10

I don’t hate women, they just shouldn’t be able to vote.
And LOLing at your own posts is truly stupid.


37 posted on 10/11/2022 2:26:35 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Even racists have civic duties, which include serving jury duty. If the verdict turns against you and you think racism was behind it, you should go for incompetent counsel because it was the job of your shyster to get the (allegedly) racist juror disqualified “for cause.” I know of no blanket legal premise that prevents racists from serving on a jury.


38 posted on 10/11/2022 3:08:09 PM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Lol.. you truly are an angry sot. Cheers


39 posted on 10/11/2022 4:01:01 PM PDT by Article10 (Roger That)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson