|
Posted on 09/19/2022 10:29:03 AM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T HoneysuckleTN]
Have you seen President Trump's powerful 4 minute video message? Don't miss it!
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Many thankQs; I couldn’t figure out why the model pics were included with the story.
How many of his videos have you heard.?
:: As I believe Christ came to stop the Babylonian Religion (Not culture) ::
You are still indulging in Gospel reductionism.
I’ll allow you your belief but I must let you know that it is heresy.
It does not align with Scripture (NOTE: not doctrine).
Scripture is the balance of truth and your belief does not lay on that scale.
BZZZT.
Nothing infiltrationy about transubstantiation.
Try Thomas Aquinas. There’s a technical definition which derives from terms explained by Aristotle.
Let’s not get into a communion debate regarding the mechanism.
Trans-substantiation does not alter the Verba “Take...this IS my...”.
Nor what is received.
Lutherans use the term con-substantiation.
So what?
It is still body-bread, wine-blood as received by the penitent.
Now, iffen y’all want to argue that the term “Eucharist” intends the Sacrament of the Altar...I’m your huckleberry.
Who cares? We’ve been right the whole time. If they want to come, let them come. They have a lot of catching up to do.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 09/19/22 Vol.425, Q Day 1785, rodguy911 wrote: I dont know one way or the other, but a few people sure think Juan O Savin is really him.DNA might answer the question.
Juan O Savin is not JFK Jr. but he spent alot of time 'helping' mistake people for him. He has 'fans' who gush that it's him - but looking at those reports more closely, I think JOS wrote it to boost attention he receives, and then he indirectly supports this rumor without making actual claims.
For example, JFK Jr. had a habit of sitting on a couch or chair with his right leg further to the right on a coffee table, and his foot turned out. JOS knows about the rumors, and then photographed his own leg in this position (his face is not in the photo). He coyly 'conceals' his identity in interviews and then crows about attending a party in Hollywood, socializing with celebrities - so the world would know if JFK Jr. was out and about town...
Some finally got him to say he wasn't JFK Jr. and he portrays bewilderment as to why anyone would think so - then goes back to the 'man of mystery' thing. I saw an image of him and he doesn't look anything like JFK Jr.
The JFK Jr. rumors in general are based on a careless, slapped together post on 4Chan. I think it was posted and, later, frequently promoted to undermine the Q movement.
The Internet put forth the rumor that JFK Jr. and his wife were seen walking with Trump to the helicopter on the White House lawn, past a cadre of photographers. If that were JFK Jr., I do think some of those photographers would have sold a picture or two as proof. When viewing the video, all we see are the backs of a dark haired man and a blond woman, and others blew it up into a JFK Jr. sighting. Then trolls pretend Q said it or we all believe it or...well anything they make up that day. :D
I listened to a short part of one. I have a scam artist detector like a hound dog has a nose for smells.
I hung on every word at the beginning. But then it dawned on me he wasn't telling me anything new. I was entranced because he was saying things I already knew about or heard about. Like I said earlier, he's a good digger or has good diggers working for him. Either way, he's not telling Anons anything they don't already know or have the skills to to find out for themselves.
Even the gay guy gets it.
https://truthsocial.com/@numberonepal/posts/109049566234990123
This was inevitable.
‘She was 12, I was 30’: Biden leaves viewers stunned in teachers speech
NY Post ^ | September 23, 2022 3:16pm | Steven NelsonPosted on 9/23/2022, 2:29:11 PM by conservative98
President Biden shocked viewers of his Friday speech to teachers when he recognized an audience member and told the crowd, “She was 12, I was 30.”
Biden lit up social media with the confounding and seemingly inappropriate aside. He did not say what he did when he was 30 and the woman was a preteen.
“You gotta say hi to me,” Biden said mid-speech at the National Education Association headquarters in DC. “We go back a long way. She was 12, I was 30. But anyway, this woman helped me get an awful lot done.”
The audience of teachers and union members laughed and cheered at the bawdy remark.
The White House did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for clarification on what the president meant.
Note to the New York Post: A man taking sexual advantage of a child isn't 'bawdy' humor, but is malevolent perversity at best, and all too often, a Satanic practice.
It's not even clear WHAT Biden was talking about - and yet the NYP goes all in as if it's 'manly' bragging?!' Real men don't tell 'jokes' like that.
The sticking point is what the words “transubstantiation” “actually being” mean.
Materialistic Westerners who believe in SCIENCE!™ have the mistaken impression that the words mean “magically transformed, to be chemically identical to”.
But, speaking of science, just as science uses everyday words but gives them a specific meaning within the context of scientific disciple (e.g. the word “force” means a scalar quantity mass multiplied by a vector quantity, acceleration, instead of a verb meaning “to compel”), the words “transubstantiation” are applied within the context of Aristotelean “accidents” and “substances” (these also being words specially defined within a disciple to mean something other than the vernacular).
did something happen to truth social? I get access denied.
I have not been on there for a couple of weeks.
Joseph?
Yes, and there is still great resistance. Even in the face of evidence. Some folks are too invested in their smug denials. I suspect many will just disappear. Probably come back with new monikers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
