You do realize pure blood is what hitter wrote to describe the master race in Mein Kamph? While I doubt you see a nazi, the origins of that phrase is quite telling.
FAIL!
Do you realize that Hitler also had a ministry of propaganda?
...you’re a senior pastor of lies in the contemporary version
You do realize there are many reasons people may want their own blood, right. A friend of mine got hepatitis during heart surgery in the 90s...and then there’s aids/related diseases. I will use whatever words I want. And I was referring to the elites and what they might do...so just get off your little horsey...sheesh
...pure blood ...
____________________________________
You may be a bit myopic.
Hitlerian locution of “pure blood” referred to a genetic trait. No one could choose to be so. No one was coerced into not being so. It was standard Racial Theory based on bloodlines. They also measured the head, proportions of features, body proportions, etc. They did not even posses genetic science at that time. The determination was made on surnames and lineage only. It was however, possible even after surnames were common for those who only had a Jewish mother to sometimes, via moving or just outright lying, to pass themselves off as not Jewish.
Fun fact: German surnames became hereditary in the 19th century. Jews, however, originally were assigned one of only 4 surnames: Gross, Klein, Schwarz, Weiss. (Big, Little, Black, White). Discrimination was endemic in German society prior to Hitler.
“In the distant past, individuals were only given a first name. Most people lived in small villages with small populations, so if you called for someone named Heinrich, chances were the right Heinrich would turn around. However, as populations increased, the multitude of people who shared the same first name became confusing.
Around the 12th century, people began to differentiate between individuals who shared the same name using the Latin word dictus (“called”), or later, with the German genant (“called”), giheizen/heisset (“is called”), den man sprichet (“of whom you speak”), den man nennt (“the one who you call”), and so on.
It looked like this: Cunradus dictus Faber, Heinricus dictus Kreier, bruder Egebreht dem man sprichet der Wolhuser (“brother Egebreht who is called the Wolhuser”), Hans Rot genannt Rotlieb, Heinrich bi dem Bach. These additions eventually evolved into the surnames we know today: Heinrich dictus Schneider became Heinrich Schneider.
These surnames were not always family names, in the sense that they were not necessarily passed down in the family. A son and a father might have different surnames. It was only in the 19th century that surnames became hereditary. By the time periods covered by MyHeritage’s birth and marriage indexes from Hesse, for example, surnames were used for the entire family.”
https://blog.myheritage.com/2020/06/german-surnames-where-they-come-from-and-what-they-mean/
Today, Pureblood refers to those who managed to resist coercion to remain uninjected. Anyone who is so fortunate may at any time be subject to a changed status by being injected, either by choice, thru coercion or forcibly, as was done on camera in Australia to the cognitively disabled.
The impetus for the appellation “Mudblood” is that, so far, those so injected do not seem to _ever_ totally clear the spike protein coded by the mRNA. Originally infected cells pass the code to daughter cells when they replicate. It is indisputably the spike protein that causes clots of varying size and degree. So, the blood is *mud* and so far appears likely to remain so.
This is of concern to the uninjected because of blood transfusions (not available in NAZI Germany) and the phenomena of spike protein transmission from the injected to those who are not.
Sometimes, history only rhymes.
Godwin’s Law
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
“ There are many corollaries to Godwin’s law, some considered more canonical (by being adopted by Godwin himself)[3] than others.[1] For example, there is a tradition in many newsgroups and other Internet discussion forums that, when a Hitler comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever made the comparison loses whatever debate is in progress.[10] This principle is itself frequently referred to as Godwin’s law.[11]”