Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Covid Injection Aftermath: Study finds 94% of “Vaccine” Recipients have Pre-Blood Clot Formations and Foreign Particles
expose-news.com ^ | August 24, 2022 | Rhoda Wilson

Posted on 08/26/2022 12:58:27 PM PDT by ransomnote

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 561-569 next last
To: gas_dr; bagster; ransomnote
Don’t engage in Q theory and practice…

Wow…

So I’m now a follower of Q?

Maybe it’s time I got my secret decoder ring from Bagster and Ransomnote.

Bags, can you help with that?

401 posted on 08/28/2022 6:13:31 PM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: CatHerd; ransomnote; bagster; Jane Long
I am tired of being explaining why I object to whacky, false and easily disproved claims. You well know it is because I am firmly anti-mandate and such nonsense undermines that cause. Secondly, all these claims about preposterous things like nano octopuses, wiggly little parasites, itty bitty razor blades, nabobots that enable mind control via 5G, etc., make us look like bunch of kooks if no one disputes them from our side.

You're lying again.

You falsely present ALL opposition to the jabs as though it is inspired by the most radical, unsubstantiated claims. Like this post.

And perform massive ad hominem attacks both against doctors going against the jabs, like this post:

All this crazy fake garbage obscures the valid reasons and hurts the anti-mandate cause. I am interested in facts and the truth. These vax doomer blogs are very, very short on both and very, very long on scaremongering, bad math, bad science and grifting.

and this post:

And while they call us "$hot$hill" and "paid Pfizer troll" for disagreeing with their bogus claims about tiny razor blades in the vaccines, etc., the vax doomer grifters rake in millions. And they (and apparently at one time perhaps the Russians) recruit paid vax doomer "influencers": https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-57928647

and this post:

It’s their goal to drive all who question their bogus claims off FR and turn this place into one giant Special Q Thread. They openly brag about that, even on the main board, and crow over running off good longtime Freepers. They apparently can’t stand any criticism of these bogus claims, but rather than keeping them on their Special Q Thread where they would be protected from critical analysis of these claims, they post them on the main board, including on threads totally unrelated to Covid. Then get all nasty if anyone challenges them. They aren’t content with what they have been given and want the whole enchillada.

Stuff it.

402 posted on 08/28/2022 6:19:37 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr
You are one of the first to ask my opinion

Like that's ever stopped you from bloviating your uninformed opinion. Trying to get you to stop would be like standing on the tracks of the stupid train as it bears down on you.


403 posted on 08/28/2022 6:20:36 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I’ve never posted about “Q theory” but it is true that the more um ... interesting ... claims about weird objects in the vaccines, etc., were posted here by Q followers, along with conspiracy theories about Covid not being a real virus, the illness was really caused by vaccines “they” snuck into other vaccines before the “plandemic” so people received the vaccines unawares and then got sick from them, not the supposedly nonexistent virus, and on and on. And then took great offense and viciously attacked anyone who disagreed with these theories. It is what it is.


404 posted on 08/28/2022 6:20:43 PM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies]

To: CatHerd

It’s a strawman. Fortunately I have a bic lighter handy, so to speak.

Get rekt, lying troll.


405 posted on 08/28/2022 6:22:14 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr
It’s the difference between repeating and understanding info.

And every time you follow either the herd, or your paymasters, or whatever it is, in attempting to talk about Q and link it to "disinformation" on the clot shots, you demonstrate your complete inability to do so on that topic.

406 posted on 08/28/2022 6:24:11 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron; bagster
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Covid Injection Aftermath: Study finds 94% of “Vaccine” Recipients have Pre-Blood Clot Formations and Foreign Particles, Magnatron wrote:
Don’t engage in Q theory and practice…

Wow…

So I’m now a follower of Q?

Maybe it’s time I got my secret decoder ring from Bagster and Ransomnote.

Bags, can you help with that?

You want it in silver or gold? Bags has the 'platinum' edition.

Basically, vax pushers lost the barfight to suppress the truth about Covid "vaccine" harm awhile ago, and now they are just throwing ash trays and calling names. Even Drudge is giving up; currently the banner headline is 'NEW COVID BOOSTERS NOT EVEN TESTED' even though the linked article is all vax-pushy.


407 posted on 08/28/2022 6:25:33 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote; bagster
Bags has the 'platinum' edition.

Ummm…

I think the platinum edition apparently gets you thrown off Free Republic from time to time.

I’ll take whatever’s below that.

408 posted on 08/28/2022 6:28:11 PM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

Take the graphene oxide version!


409 posted on 08/28/2022 6:29:35 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron
Maybe it’s time I got my secret decoder ring from Bagster and Ransomnote. Bags, can you help with that?

Of course I can. I'll move you to the top of the list.

Would you be interested in the latest tinfoil hat model? We call it the 'stingy brim'.


410 posted on 08/28/2022 6:31:33 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron
I think the platinum edition apparently gets you thrown off Free Republic from time to time.

You bet your John Brown mind it does.

Might even get you sued by hyperactive mental patients.


411 posted on 08/28/2022 6:37:49 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

When an overwhelming minority of a profession of learned scholars and advanced degree holders who are trained in scientific method are what you hang your hard on it’s laughable.

But there are fringes in every profession. The problem with you pining ransom note and Jane is that there is only one conclusion in their and your view. None of you are particularly open to any other explanations It is this that is contradictory to scientific method.

But please stop pinging them when you respond to me out of respect to our mutual requests of each other to not engage directly

Thank you for your consideration and adherence to the rules of the forum.


412 posted on 08/28/2022 6:37:52 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr
But please stop pinging them when you respond to me out of respect to our mutual requests of each other to not engage directly

That is INDIRECT engagement between you and them; I ping those people so they can find what I wrote.

413 posted on 08/28/2022 6:39:32 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr
...what you hang your hard on it’s laughable.

Probly time to take a porn break, gassie. You're getting overexcited again.


414 posted on 08/28/2022 6:41:25 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

A distinction without difference.
You are bringing the engagement. I politely request you follow the rules. They weee not mentioned in the post. They are more than capable of searching your posts.

I assume you in good faith wish to abide the rules. If not, so be it


415 posted on 08/28/2022 6:46:50 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

I’m glad it’s died down and your job is safe! The mandates were outrageous and really got my hackles up. Yay for you and standing your ground.

I almost never watch TV, and when I do it’s something like a Jane Austen movie or a nature documentary on Amazon Prime (blush), so I haven’t seen the Pfizer commercials. It’s weird, isn’t it? Still hoping to squeeze out a few more $?

Or maybe they hope the scaremongering about a surge in the fall will increase demand? I have my doubts it will be by much, though. As I wrote in my #400 above:

“Everybody is sick and tired of hearing about Covid, of lockdowns, and only a pitiful few are really worried about the new kinder, gentler Omicron variants. Besides, we’ve nearly all already had the Omicron.”

We’ll see. I certainly hope they don’t succeed with the scaremongering this time around!


416 posted on 08/28/2022 6:53:51 PM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "All's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 388 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr; grey_whiskers; Jane Long; ransomnote
None of you are particularly open to any other explanations.

Haha, look who's talking.

But please stop pinging them when you respond to me out of respect to our mutual requests of each other to not engage directly

Nothing gets poor gassie to spaz out spasmodically more than pinging Ransomnote and (especially) Jane Long. (pinging them out of FR etiquette rule #69 subsection Q).

Like as if they aren't reading each post on this thread already.

Wee gassie still has nightmares from the numerous whoopin's them two laid upon him his tender bottom. His therapist recommended he not even look at their typed names. It triggers him somethin' fierce.

His lawyers have also been in consultation.

#MentalHealthTakesAVillage


417 posted on 08/28/2022 6:54:07 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

They will anyways.

No amount of real doctor data makes any difference to those with an agenda.

If they can’t refute the facts, they’ll just commit character assassination.

ANYTHING but admit they were wrong.


418 posted on 08/28/2022 6:55:09 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Excellent meme.


419 posted on 08/28/2022 6:56:25 PM PDT by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr
When an overwhelming minority of a profession of learned scholars and advanced degree holders who are trained in scientific method are what you hang your hard on it’s laughable.

"Hang your hard on" ? Stop typing with one hand, troll.

Science is never determined by consensus. You gave away game, set, and match right there.

Counterexample: Lister.

Counterexample: "More doctors smoke Camel than any other cigarette"

Counterexample: Heliobacter and ulcers.

Counterexample: Ivermectin and the FDA posts public service ads "Stop it. You are not a horse."

$hot $hill$. If an OTC was found good enough, the whole tens of billions of dollars for EUA goes out the window: and the chance of establishing a miraculous bridgehead to use mRNA based shots for everything under the sun going forward.

Get rekt. The authorities were lying about everything under the sun in every possible way from the beginning of this.

And by defying established protocols, e.g. 10-year periods to look at jabs for side effects, ignoring or losing or reclassifying side effects reported to VAERS and allowing more deaths reported to VAERS in less than a year, than reported for all real vaccines combined over 30 years, re-defining the very meaning of the word vaccine, totally unnecessary lockdowns and masking, overlooking protocols which saved patients on ventilators (which I posted to you personally) and to which you replied (literal exact cut-and-paste):

"An OTC for sickle cell? Ok. I am game to hear what saved 85% of patients. On ventilators. I am really really sure there was no such critter Strike Three"

Source

Sticking your nose in the air and saying "I am always right, because DOCTOR!" (either on your own behalf, or the medical establishment, or Pfauci/Pfizer/Moderna) is not gonna work.

Even aside from the well known reproducibility problem in medicine.

We KNOW the establishment is lying beyond any of our darkest nightmares of 5 years ago.

We KNOW that Big Pharma has its hand up the FDA's rear like a puppet.

We KNOW that some of the non profit groups countering "Vax disinformation" (a Marxist neologism, like "TERF"), are also doing "climate change disinformation". We KNOW the Climate Change pushers, tried to professionally ruin the careers of those upsetting the apple cart.

So trying to say "see, they're not real scientists, or they're not recognized, or not peer review" or even "lied about working at Baylor" isn't gonna cut it. If you were honest, you'd have posted his side of that story too.

The jab pushers, and those defending them credibility left, not even a shred of it.

And those who "praise with faint damns" the jab pushers, while using strawmen on those pushing against the jabs, no matter what sanctimonious excuses they hide behind, have chosen their side: if they were honest they would be LOUDLY pushing the most rigorous of the evidence against the jabs, instead of alternating between hiding that evidence, shooting the messenger, and pompously and fatuously pushing mere credentialism.

Get stuffed.

420 posted on 08/28/2022 6:57:35 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 561-569 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson