Covid Injection Aftermath: Study finds 94% of “Vaccine” Recipients have Pre-Blood Clot Formations and Foreign Particles

expose-news.com ^ | August 24, 2022 | Rhoda Wilson

[ransomnote]

[H/T Fractal Trader]

An Italian study published two weeks ago in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (“IJVTPR”) revealed almost everyone who had been injected had abnormalities after “Covid vaccination.” In 94% of vaccinees’ blood, there was an aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes.

The study began in March 2021. Using dark-field microscopy, the researchers analysed blood samples from 1,006 referred to the Giovannini Biodiagnostic Centre for various disorders after being injected with Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA “vaccines.”

The study authors noted that the “vaccines” are purported to contain at least the spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, but are known also to contain foreign particles that the many promoters of the experimental injections claimed were not in them at all. “Among those foreign components are metallic objects as demonstrated previously in this journal by Lee et al. (2022) which are confirmed in our results.”

Of the 1,006 cases analysed, only 58 – equal to 5.77% of the total – presented a completely normal haematological picture upon microscopic analysis after the last mRNA injection with either the Moderna or Pfizer concoction.  The blood of 948 – 94% of the study’s participants – showed aggregation of red blood cells and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA injection.

In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal haematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves.

We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

---

Below we include some highlights, although the paper contains so many important points it is difficult to select which are the highlights. The paper is written in such a way that those without formal science training can easily understand and it is well worth taking the time to read it in its entirety. For those who wish to delve a little deeper, the reference section at the end of their paper provides further resources.

The study authors included photographs of the 4 clinical cases which “reveal strange phenomena in their blood and illustrate the range and types of the anomalies found in the microscopic examination of the blood of 94.23% of the 1,006 cases … [these 4 cases are] representative of all 948 cases with peripheral blood alterations.” 

We have included some of these photographs below, the accompanying descriptions are self-explanatory.

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, 12 August 2022

In their discussion and conclusion section, the authors wrote:

Aggregation of erythrocytes were highlighted and exogenous point-like and self-luminescent particles in the dark-field were detected. The luminescence of those particles was markedly higher than that of oxygenated red blood cell walls.

The 948 cases, showed tubular/fibrous formations and frequently also crystalline and lamellar formations with extremely complex but consistently similar morphologies across all of the patients with abnormal blood samples.

Our results are so similar to those of  Lee et al. (2022) that it could be claimed that, except for our innovative application of dark-field microscopy to mark the foreign metal-like objects in the blood of mRNA injections from Pfizer or Moderna, we have replicated the blood work of the Korean doctors with a much larger sample.

What seems plain enough is that metallic particles resembling graphene oxide and possibly other metallic compounds, like those discovered by Gatti and Montanari (Montanari & Gatti, 2016; Gatti & Montanari, 2012, 2017, 2018), have been included in the cocktail of  whatever the manufacturers have seen fit to put in the so-called mRNA “vaccines.”

In our experience as clinicians, these mRNA injections are very unlike traditional “vaccines” and their manufacturers need, in our opinions, to come clean about what is in the injections and why it is there.

In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying haemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented.

In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow, especially at the level of the capillaries.Benzi Cipelli, R., Giovannini, F., & Pisano, G. (2022). Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, 2(2), 385–444. https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v2i2.47

Further resources:

• Chief Investigator confirms AstraZeneca Vaccine IS to blame for rare blood clots, 21 March 2021
• Scientific Study finds the spike protein used in Covid Vaccines causes Strokes, Heart attacks, and Blood Clots, 19 May 2021
• The real pandemic – Covid-19 or Graphene Oxide? Poisonous Nano-Material found in Covid Vaccines and Face Masks, 10 July 2021
• The Long-Term Outlook Due to Blood Clotting from Covid Injections is Very Grim Because with Each Successive Shot, it Will Add More Damage to Capillaries, 21 August 2021
• Covid Injection Secret Ingredients | UK Scientists confirm Graphene and New Zealand Scientists confirm Nanotechnology; What’s The Aim? 12 February 2022
• Medicine Regulators knew in October 2020 that the Covid-19 Vaccines would cause blood clots, heart damage, harm to children, and death, 22 August 2021
• German Doctors and Lawyers Assess Blood Smears from People Who Have Had Covid Injections: “For me this is euthanasia. For me this is mass murder, a crime on a grand scale”, 31 August 2021
• Canadian Researchers Find Carbon Nanotech and Thulium in Moderna and Pfizer Covid Injections, 27 May 2022
• German Researchers Examine Covid “Vaccines” and Vaccinated People’s Blood and Say Stop Vaccinations Immediately, 13 August 2022
  
  

---

[Metrobank]

Life insurance companies disagree with your assertions. Maybe you can point to a factor other than the “vaccines” that have caused a huge spike in deaths outside of actuarial norms? In all age groups I might add.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Could somebody please tell me why they couldn’t have better QC in Operation Warp Speed?

Or, God forbid, all this gobbledygook in some (most?) of the shots was intentional for some reason.

I may be screwed. I took the two Pfraudzer shots, but fortunately, have not had any boosters.

The end.

Coronavirus PING!

[gas_dr]

I’m not seeking the removal of anyone. Did I call for that? Please show me where I did. I pointed out that the free and capital market is speaking. Is it not factual that there is increasing struggle of meeting financials goals in terms of fundraising. A lot of members have pointed it out

How do you explain the data which are it is taking more time to meet goal and less donations are being made? Happy to listen to the alternative theory. You try to twist words and then advance a false narrative.

Where have I ever said the topics should be banned? I have called for your banning based on your flagrant violation of the rules that are printed for all to see. I have called for robust debate. But please, stop lying and twisting words.

When presented opportunities for improvement for violating forum rules, I have chosen to do what was asked. You do not do the same. In fact you boldly continue to break the rules. Some of your more egregious posts were removed, some because I reported the abuse. That is correct. Your response? Further mockery and bullying. So you choose not to learn. Your behavior continues to be what it is and people tell you they are leaving because of you. You view this as success. I just hope you choose to make up the finances You certainly can recruit the other Q theorists to help. But the data currently to not bear out that you are making up the difference. We shall see how the fund raising progresses. If it continues to fail to meet expectations the questions is why.

[Jane Long]

I see two power-tripping members of this forum threatening to *sue* people for libel. That’s beyond appalling. Threatening to sue people just to be vindictive against those who disagree with them and stand up to their insulting bullying.

---

Fortunately, these delusional swarmers are the very small minority, here, and, thankfully....now that folks are (FINALLY) waking up, around the world.

Remember....leftists have no issues/policies they can stand on/for....so, they have to do their best Alinsky and attempt to attack/distract.

If these folks were truly who/what they say they support, they would find threads ‘touting the wonders’ of these horrid $hots to post/post all of their “facts” and info on, rather than swarming to $hot warning threads....and hurling threats.

I’ve notice their new tactic is to ATTEMPT to tie $hot warning thread OPs, posters....and, Q (they seem obsessed with Q, for some reason 🤔) to FR traffic. Again....a pitiful attempt to Alinsky FRee speech.

Also fortunately, is that the majority, here, see this.

Lame and laughable, at the very least. Arrogance on full display 😉

[Vermont Lt]

They had the same QC as any other trials.

What they skipped were long term trials.

And, they pretty much hand carried the applications through the process.

MRNA vaccines have been in the works for a long time. They are almost “plug and play.”

Keep in mind there has never been an effective traditional vaccine against the coronavirus family. There still isn’t one.

[gas_dr]

It is Q theory. It is an accurate description of what is advanced by those who identify as Q members. It is also neither inflammatory nor derogatory. See…it is possible to make argument and remain in the rules of the forum.

And theory is exposed to testing and analysis. It appears to me that the theory advanced has some serious flaws in its construct.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Yep. Any traditional vaccine, when used, predisposed the patient to AED when the actual coronavirus attacked, IIRC.

[Metrobank]

What they don't supply is the makeup of their shots including how many milliliters of all ingredients. Why are people finding weird organisms in their blood after these shots? This is according to morticians. Frankly, I am not inclined to believe Moderna or Pfizer is telling the truth about what is in these shots or what they failed to mention that is included. Remember, Purdue Pharma lied their asses off about their opiod products. Bought and paid for in “donations” to various doctors. Big Pharma lies. That is a fact.

[gas_dr]

Sure. Looking at the last article posted on this subject it appears that the rise in deaths predated the vaccine. This makes sense in terms of alpha and delta strains. Full vaccination didn’t occur until after the spike had stated. There is a lot of data around the issues. The timing that some point to demonstrate and immediate spike on approval of the vaccine. This is false. There was a steady increase in deaths long before. The essential element not being taken into the analysis is the data you reference is not discerning the actual time line.

[Allegra]

Your narrative is incorrect.

No it’s not. I have very good comprehension skills, thank you very much.

And I’ll be honest. I’m not going to read the rest of your long post. I did read the book you wrote to bagster, replete with veiled threats. It disgusted me.

If somebody doxxed you, that’s very wrong and I sympathize with you for that. I don’t blame you for taking action in such a case.

But to threaten other FReepers with legal action just because they stand up to you and disagree with what you say? I’m not stupid; I saw what your book-like post’s intent was. Kudos to bagster for assigning it the ridicule it deserves.

And shame on you.

I’m including bagster on here since I named him.

[gas_dr]

You are aware that it is now regulated that big pharma is forbidden from financial incentives to physicians. Clearly 30 years ago some of my brethren were total kids and in exchange for no show jobs and lots of perks, they prescribed or promoted whatever the company wanted.

However now this is so tightly regulated it is nearly impossible for pharma to buy physicians off. That’s why it is laughable when members of the Q theorists insist we are being paid.

[Jane Long]

MRNA vaccines have been in the works for a long time. They are almost “plug and play.”

~~~~

I’d be curious about the long term effects of these previous (2010 - 2017) studies....and, how the test subjects are faring.

---

Keep in mind there has never been an effective traditional vaccine against the coronavirus family. There still isn’t one.

~~~~

What about good old, NATURAL immunity? That seems to offer the best effectiveness, so far.

[gas_dr]

I have made no veiled threat against him. I have merely pointed out what the implications are.
Thank you for your comment on me being doxxed os wrong. Are you willing to also condemn those how call us Murderers or nazis?

[CatHerd]

Your stated objection was that the vaccine manufacturers hid behind “proprietary ingredients”. Now it’s that the CDC does say “how many milliliters of all ingredients”. Well, I did not see “proprietary ingredients” on the list, so maybe answered on question at least.

You are asking me to address claims you have not presented. Do you have links to share about these “weird organisms in their blood”? What “weird organisms” and what “morticians”? What exactly are these people claiming and who are they?

Did Perdue lie about the ingredients in their opioids? I know they did a lot of dirty rotten stuff, but I’ve never heard or read they lied about that.

You did the same in your post about life insurance companies and deaths. What exactly are these claims being made by these life insurance companies, and which life insurance companies are they? Again, no links.

[Allegra]

Are you willing to also condemn those how call us Murderers or nazis?

I haven’t seen anybody doing that, or have I ever done so, so do *not* attempt to drag me in to any of that.

I do, however, remember you calling those of us who questioned the shot “flat-earthers,” among other things. I saw that on several occasions.

I am not a follower of Q, but some of my friends are. Why do so many of the vax-enthusiasts have such a burr in their hides about the Q group?

[gas_dr]

Don’t you find it interesting that when asked to condemn the criminal accusations leveled by some here and to explain changes in support patterns, it is radio silent.

The once that really cracks me up is when we get to vile attacks from members who represent themselves as Christian. It is cringeworthy.

Kudos on pointing out that when you respond on point with evidence that the question changes. Appreciate your insights. Even when being accused of being the other uppity freeper on this thread. Perhaps you should learn your place in the self created hierarchy.

[Allegra]

Don’t you find it interesting that when asked to condemn the criminal accusations leveled by some here and to explain changes in support patterns, it is radio silent.

Oh, just stop. You failed to get the response you wanted from me, so you go gossiping to one of your own, like some old dowager busybody.

I’m not going to “condemn” something I did not participate in or witness, and no amount of manipulative tactics will make me do so.

The methods you and your buddy, the other little threat-issuer use here are reprehensible.

[bagster]

I’m not seeking the removal of anyone. Did I call for that? Please show me where I did.

Your conspiracy theory about decreased donations is intended to have that effect. You know that.

I pointed out that the free and capital market is speaking.

You pointed out your conspiracy theory. What if my conspiracy theory states that the reason is the five year long harassment of 'Qtards' and now 'anti-vaxxers' is the free and capital market speaking?

How do you explain the data which are it is taking more time to meet goal and less donations are being made? Happy to listen to the alternative theory.

See above alternate conspiracy theory.

Where have I ever said the topics should be banned?

Only with every smarmy, condescending, ridiculing, arrogant, know-it-all word that oozes out of your festering gob.

I have called for your banning based on your flagrant violation of the rules that are printed for all to see.

Okay, Lenny. Censor away. I now call for your banning for pushing a harmful government program responsible for the present and future death and maiming of a large number of human beings. And being a general pain in the ass while doing it.

I AM NOT A VAXTARD OR AN ANTI-VAXXER. I AM A HUMAN BEING!!!

Some of your more egregious posts were removed, some because I reported the abuse.

Hmmm, just the other day you claimed to not be a snitch. Is there no end to your lies?

Your response? Further mockery and bullying.

...people tell you they are leaving because of you.

Have you ever considered that people are leaving because of you? You are quite repulsive and people can hear your shtick on CNN if they wanna.

You view this as success.

I view this as your attempt to manipulate the owners of this site and the group and to threaten and extort them with threats of monetary damage to achieve your goals. And a large amount of butthurt and revenge.

#LennyBruce

[gas_dr]

Fair question. Yes I responded calling some flat earthers which was wrong. I got thunked for it. Regardless that is was in response to being called a stream of vile names.

I never said add those accusations, I merely asked do you condemn them. It is quite common especially on Q threads

I have been called among other things; Mengele, murderer (complete with intentionally killing patients), and been told I commit crimes against humanity for which I should hang from a yard arm.

The division that Q theorists create is that it is clear they attack those who do not agree with them, not in terms of debate, but over the top statements. Look back in recent threads - they even create lists of members to be harassed. That is a little chilling.

The overall volume of hyperbole is one thing, the absolute commitment to destruction of those who disagree is why we have a burr on our saddle

I appreciate your questions and discussion. We can disagree humanely. It seems that Q threads depart from kindness and humanity.

[gas_dr]

Fair question. Yes I responded calling some flat earthers which was wrong. I got thunked for it. Regardless that is was in response to being called a stream of vile names.

I never said add those accusations, I merely asked do you condemn them. It is quite common especially on Q threads

I have been called among other things; Mengele, murderer (complete with intentionally killing patients), and been told I commit crimes against humanity for which I should hang from a yard arm.

The division that Q theorists create is that it is clear they attack those who do not agree with them, not in terms of debate, but over the top statements. Look back in recent threads - they even create lists of members to be harassed. That is a little chilling.

The overall volume of hyperbole is one thing, the absolute commitment to destruction of those who disagree is why we have a burr on our saddle

I appreciate your questions and discussion. We can disagree humanely. It seems that Q threads depart from kindness and humanity.