The Q-clock is a total fabrication by Anons.
It was never endorsed as comms by Q or Trump.
Still doesn’t mean it isn’t significant as an archival instrument.
Its ability to predict \the future to prove the past\ can only be evaluated in the present.
YMMV
Drop 307
Q answers anon question “What happened on 12/7?”
“Clock started - 10 days.”
This is why on the Q Clock the 12/7 dot is in the [00]/12 position. Maybe that’s when operations began. 🤷♂️ This is also why the dots before 12/7/2017 are brown to denote drops rather than blue.
Drop 506
“Future proves past.
Wind the CLOCK.
The CLOCK and the GRAPHIC are ESSENTIAL.”
I do believe Q was referring to the graphic of the clock posted by Anon some days earlier. And if you read that backwards it’s essentially saying what Cletus is saying. Bonus, this was the drop where Q also affirmed Anons should be looking at deltas between drops and Trump tweets.
There is also something significant about Nov 2, 2017 drop 61. This is the day Q began signing the posts with “Q”. It may be where the map starts working backward through time. In this post Q refers to itself in the first person.
“Please refer back and collect my crumbs.”
“If this doesn’t signal what I’ve been saying I don’t know what will.”
Further “we” is also used in this post. Is this where the posts stopped coming from one person and were handled as a team?
Don’t know if it’s a total fabrication; though I never saw any justification for it.
There was a post here on the Q threads in the last few days by the 17th something or other regiment, purporting to be from Q or similar, explaining the use of game theory and the game centipede played out in polar coordinates.
That might be analogous to the Q-clock; but I do not find it persuasive, merely food for thought.
Otherwise, concur.