Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA's epic Artemis 1 moon mission on a Space Launch System megarocket is 1 month away
space.com ^ | Mike Wall

Posted on 07/30/2022 7:43:34 PM PDT by BenLurkin

Artemis 1 team must meet a variety of checkouts and other milestones to make it happen. Indeed, Aug. 29 is just one of three "placeholder" dates in an upcoming Artemis 1 launch window, along with Sept. 2 and Sept. 5...

Artemis 1 will be the first mission in NASA's Artemis program of lunar exploration, which aims to establish a permanent human presence on and around the moon by the late 2020s. It will be the first flight for the powerful but long-delayed SLS and the second for Orion, which aced a quick test flight to Earth orbit back in 2014.

NASA has been gearing up for Artemis 1 for months now. For example, the agency rolled the SLS-Orion stack out to Launch Complex 39B at Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida in mid-March, two weeks ahead of a "wet dress rehearsal," a crucial series of tests that included a simulated launch countdown and fueling of the SLS.

Technical issues scuttled that attempt, however, and the Artemis 1 stack was rolled off the pad and back to KSC's Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) in late April to make some repairs.

Those fixes took about a month. The SLS and Orion were rolled back out to the pad in early June for another crack at the wet dress, which began on June 18. Technicians noticed a hydrogen leak during fueling operations on June 20 but were able to work past it, and mission team members ultimately declared the rehearsal a success.

(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: artemis; nasa; spacelaunchsystem
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 07/30/2022 7:43:34 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Cool! As an old time NASA space junkie (and a vendor for some of their software operations), I’m stoked to hear the good news.

Let’s hope the woke folk don’t turn this into a “check off the minority box” deal!


2 posted on 07/30/2022 7:48:52 PM PDT by Ratman0823 (Always remember: "Figures don't lie, but liars figure")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Sure it is....


3 posted on 07/30/2022 7:53:37 PM PDT by wildcard_redneck (Germans are bat-crap crazy for cold showers, high energy bills, and boiled turnips.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ratman0823

The whole program seems to be a repeat of what we have already done just to prove diversity. Whatever happens, the brilliance and competence of the Apollo program(Mercury and Gemini(included) will never be matched. I will pray for them that there are still people there led by God. That whole program had God’s protection.

Probably the last thing our government did that was worthwhile, successful and somewhat bipartisan. I’m reading Rocket Men now and the Apollo 8 book-my favorite mission. I even listen to the whole mission on youtube just to take a break form the insane demonic world now in which we live. Simpler times.

Frank Borman and Jim Lovell are still alive -mid 90s. Great men. My Dad’s old boss at Eastern Air Lines was Frank Borman,not the greatest CEO but the right man at the right time for America. Dad met him a few times.


4 posted on 07/30/2022 8:22:43 PM PDT by ground_fog ( My God this was from today!S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
THIS is a megarocket:


5 posted on 07/30/2022 8:22:46 PM PDT by Jim Noble (I’ve stumbled on the side of twelve misty mountains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
How We Are Going to the Moon (and beyond, with Artemis opening the door, 5min 30sec YouTube vid)
6 posted on 07/30/2022 8:24:24 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

They’ve already loaded the mannequin astronaut for tests during the flight.

NASA’s ‘Moonikin’ mannequin boards Orion spacecraft for Artemis 1 moon mission

https://www.space.com/nasa-moonikin-artemis-1-mannequin-on-orion-capsule


7 posted on 07/30/2022 8:28:47 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (No!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

You can bet a whole committee made sure that it’s a gender-neutral moonikin.


8 posted on 07/30/2022 8:35:07 PM PDT by bigbob (z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ground_fog

I wholeheartedly agree.

Are you familiar with the Apollo in real time website?

It is the 11, 13 and 17 missions all archived mission control chatter pictures and video combined for the entire missions from launch to splashdown.

https://apolloinrealtime.org/


9 posted on 07/30/2022 8:48:41 PM PDT by TFG (RIP America 1776-2021)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Bookmark


10 posted on 07/30/2022 8:49:36 PM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (The more I learn about people, the more I like my dog. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ground_fog

Those were amazing times. My dad worked for McDonnell, but not on the space capsules, and we followed the missions. One of my early memories is of watching Mercury launches with a friend and drawing pictures of the rockets.


11 posted on 07/30/2022 8:58:30 PM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (The more I learn about people, the more I like my dog. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Only a government that prints money can afford this old-school approach which wastefully expends boosters and upper stages.

No government could have marched European civilization across the US continent in the time frame it was done. Only in the name of commerce (mostly) could it happen. No government designed or built the prairie schooners thankfully; imagine the overweight monstrosity a government agency would have come up with even in mid-19th century. It was done by entrepreneurs who had to be competitively sensible.

No government agency will produce self-sustaining off-world human civilizations. It will be done by entrepreneurs who don’t throw away their equipment after one use.


12 posted on 07/30/2022 9:44:16 PM PDT by JustaTech (A mind is a terrible thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Only one month before the first official delay!


13 posted on 07/30/2022 10:31:26 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TFG

Thanks for the link! I’ve bookmarked the page, will visit and relive the great days of NASA when I have some time.

I’ve read a number of books on NASA in the Golden Age, among then Kranz’ “Failure is not an Option”, Chaikin’s “A Man on The Moon” (basis for HBO Series “From the Earth to the Moon”) and Lovell’s “Lost Moon” (basis for movie “Apollo 13”). Now reading Cox and Murray’s “Apollo”, about how the whole program came about and was done back in the 60s.

This stuff really needs to be required reading for the next generation so they can learn how America used to roll up its sleeves and just do the job before and without “anti-social media”.


14 posted on 07/30/2022 10:50:52 PM PDT by Ratman0823 (Always remember: "Figures don't lie, but liars figure")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Wake up people...

It’s all about the money...
Stop wasting money on moon explorations that lead to nothing, zero, zilch...


15 posted on 07/31/2022 1:02:09 AM PDT by Pez149 (Time to stop saying a theory is fact....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustaTech

SpaceX landing booster rockets successfully.
16 posted on 07/31/2022 3:44:25 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

A colossal waste of taxpayers’ hard earned money (like almost everything the government does). There isn’t anything on the moon worth the cost of getting there and back. Scientific samples were taken decades ago by the Apollo program. And nothing about the moon has changed since then. So what’s the point of going? Are they going to have a crew black lesbian transgenders and lesbians to counter the white heterosexual males who went on Apollo?


17 posted on 07/31/2022 5:19:36 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy - EVs a solution for which there is no problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustaTech

18 posted on 07/31/2022 5:50:49 AM PDT by Pollard (If there's a question mark in the headline, the answer should always be No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The main visual similarity with Apollo is the shape of the unit the astronats occupy and return to earth in. That was apparently determined by the “rocketless” re-entry to the earth’s atmosphere and with that the need to have a “shield” surface facing down, to protect the astronauts from the heat generated by their more-or-less falling container.

I would have thoght by now we would have advanced to fully powered re-entry to earth’s atmosphere, where a powered vehicle would not descend rapidly but instead would make successively lower orbits until it could finally land.

Maybe when we jetison the heavy fuels we know use for very small nuclear power modules our home-bound astronauts will quit “dropping” back to earth like a stone.


19 posted on 07/31/2022 6:49:49 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Epic. Mega. Ultra. MAGA.

But no mention how this accomplishes NASA’s number one mission of making Muslims feel good about themselves.


20 posted on 07/31/2022 11:06:20 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson