Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

That was quick.
1 posted on 07/20/2022 9:26:50 AM PDT by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: C210N

It was a one in a million shot.


2 posted on 07/20/2022 9:29:00 AM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

Shouldn’t have made it a Micrometeoroid Magnet ,so how much did cost per hour until this happened


3 posted on 07/20/2022 9:29:01 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

Hopefully they bought travel insurance.


4 posted on 07/20/2022 9:30:44 AM PDT by ConservaTexan (February 6, 1911/June 14, 1944)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

More:

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/3566782-webb-telescope-suffered-uncorrectable-damage-in-micrometeoroid-hit-nasa-report-says/


5 posted on 07/20/2022 9:30:49 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

That is why starships have shields, to deflect objects like this.


6 posted on 07/20/2022 9:31:04 AM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

It was a strike more powerful than they had prepared for, but the telescope is still operating better than they had hoped for even with this new defect.


9 posted on 07/20/2022 9:32:57 AM PDT by Pox (Eff You China. Buy American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

Maybe Musk will pick it up cheap and repair it


10 posted on 07/20/2022 9:33:22 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

Murphys Law


11 posted on 07/20/2022 9:34:16 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

I wondered how long it would take and it didn’t take long.

How many years? How many billions of dollars?

They never learn. They don’t have to. They spend play money and they don’t earn it.

What should we expect from a society that will pay $100 million for Taylor Swift’s cat to endorse products?

Not much.

Such a society should not last long but it does somehow.

Amazing isn’t it?


13 posted on 07/20/2022 9:34:54 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Politicians are only marginally good at one thing, being politicians. Otherwise they are fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

can we get a refund?


14 posted on 07/20/2022 9:35:35 AM PDT by SteveH (.all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

Obviously we saw something we were not supposed to see


16 posted on 07/20/2022 9:40:40 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

I hope they sprang for the extended warranty coverage.


17 posted on 07/20/2022 9:43:59 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte (11/3-11/4/2020 - The USA became a banana republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

Should have bought the extended warranty


18 posted on 07/20/2022 9:44:55 AM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom Hi Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

Shoulda bought the warranty...


19 posted on 07/20/2022 9:45:07 AM PDT by decal (They won't stop, so they'll have to be stopped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

The problem of a man made object being in a one million mile diameter orbit is that it would be impossible with presently known propellants to go out to it, stop, fix the problem, and return to earth .Let’s hope the telescope has self healing abilities.


21 posted on 07/20/2022 9:46:53 AM PDT by ga1948
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N
The impact however does not seem to have damaged the telescope's ability to perform any of its tasks. Rather, the telescope is exceeding expectations "almost all across the board".

This is going to anger some folks....

23 posted on 07/20/2022 9:48:46 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

Biden even screwed up this telescope. C’mon Man !! Get with it.


24 posted on 07/20/2022 9:50:26 AM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

Takes a licking, but keeps on ticking.

They state that even shot up, it’s performing above their expectations. I guess it was intentionally over engineered.


26 posted on 07/20/2022 9:51:35 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N
From linked article;

The impact however does not seem to have damaged the telescope's ability to perform any of its tasks. Rather, the telescope is exceeding expectations "almost all across the board".

So...non-story? Nothing burger?

27 posted on 07/20/2022 9:51:51 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Great minds drink alike...me and my baby havin' a hell of a night. - - BB King)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C210N

The physical damage may be unrepairable and there will be some loss of image quality, but I would think comparing post-impact images with calibration images would mean much of the degradation could be eliminated with software.


30 posted on 07/20/2022 9:55:43 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson