Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/18/2022 5:12:23 PM PDT by Ennis85
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ennis85

“Marriage was always an issue that was left to the states,” he said.

True. It’s just not in the Constitution. Nothing in there at all about marriage, abortion, contraception. Wanting it to be in there just doesn’t make it so.


2 posted on 07/18/2022 5:17:37 PM PDT by cdcdawg (Hoes mad! LOL! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Didn’t even California vote against gay “marriage” ?? I don’t know if it was ever that popular of an idea.


3 posted on 07/18/2022 5:18:22 PM PDT by escapefromboston (Free Chauvin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ennis85

I saw one of their headlines say “Cruz decision is wrong.”


7 posted on 07/18/2022 6:11:30 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ennis85
Don't get me wrong. I totally oppose same-sex 'marriage' but the Constitution does give the courts a problem:

Article IV

Section 1

Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State.

This means, I believe that same-sex marriages allowed by one state MUST be recognized by the other states. This gives us a sticky problem. Does Senator Cruz deal with this?

8 posted on 07/18/2022 6:21:59 PM PDT by newberger (Put not your trust in princes, in sons of men in whom there is no salvation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson