|
Posted on 06/20/2022 3:43:39 AM PDT by ransomnote
DAILY REMINDER!!!Transcript of Riccardo Bosi's warning ["No consent. No consent. No consent"]
Ricardo Bosi explains what's really going on in the Ukraine (TRANSCRIPT and 3 minute video)
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
I agree, she’s strayed one time too many. I am done with her and my vote will show it.
Her district was Democrat-held for more than 150 years.
She is strong for border control. Her husband is BP.
She is pro-God, pro-family, pro-freedom.
The conservative women, especially the mothers, are making a great impact in this war to save America.
I did more than just vote for her last time, I went out and buttonholed people, spread the message, pleaded her case and pushed people over onto the right side of the fence.
Next time around, she gets NOTHING... the same thing she is now giving us on our Constitutional rights.
She, Mitch, Cornyn and the rest of the spineless side of the satrapy deserve one another.
Ernst went full loon after blabbing about a sexual assault, promptly grew old and grey and long faced.
WTH?
She was never the same since “sharing”. No more sparkle, energy, or perculating assertiveness.
Now the easy marker for “McConnell-think”, never far from his annointing right hand, seen cooperating with his abhorrent agenda of UniParty, for dove tailing with Dems. “Agenda 2030”.
And no one questioned Pence’s bonafides until he went to DC...
DC is where one’s true nature is revealed.
To make it especially clear, this is not a lawsuit on election integrity.
It’s a suit which challenged the ability of the State to intervene on election cases,which makes sense because it’s the State that will have implemented the Election Standards to begin with, so of course they can intervene to uphold them.
The speaker of the North Carolina State House of Representatives and the president pro tempore of the North Carolina State Senate are entitled to intervene in this litigation challenging North Carolina’s voter-ID law.
In effect, it means if the State catches people not following the law, liberal judges can’t file a string of injunctions to let people ignore the law. Now it’s a settled matter of the court, so the STATE LAW must be upheld, or people get charged with voter fraud.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Supreme Court Says North Carolina Republicans Can Defend Photo ID Law In Court
https://conservativebrief.com/supreme-10-64037/
The US. Supreme Court has ruled 8-1 that leaders of North Carolina’s Republican legislature can step in to advocate for a voter ID law in court that they believe the state’s Democratic attorney general isn’t fighting hard enough to defend.
Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor was the only one to dissent in the case, which has been closely watched given November’s crucial midterm elections are just months away.
“At the heart of this lawsuit lies a challenge to the constitutionality of a North Carolina election law. But the merits of that dispute are not before us, only an antecedent question of civil procedure: Are two leaders of North Carolina’s state legislature entitled to participate in the case under the terms of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure,” Gorsuch wrote in the opinion.
“Within wide constitutional bounds, States are free to structure themselves as they wish. Often, they choose to
conduct their affairs through a variety of branches, agencies, and elected and appointed officials. These constituent pieces sometimes work together to achieve shared goals; other times they reach very different judgments about important policy questions and act accordingly. This diffusion of governmental powers within and across institutions may be an everyday feature of American life. But it can also pose its difficulties when a State’s laws or policies are challenged in federal court,” he added.
Here’s the opinion from Neil Gorsuch in Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP: https://t.co/3KvasUOpDV. Sonia Sotomayor dissents.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) June 23, 2022
The case involved whether Republican lawmakers in North Carolina can intervene to defend the state’s voter ID law from lawsuits.
Republican lawmakers say the state’s Democratic Attorney General John Stein is not properly defending the law from legal challenges brought by the NAACP and other groups who claim it violates the Constitution and the Voting Rights Act.
Back in September, a North Carolina three-judge panel blocked the state’s photo voter ID law, ruling that it “was motivated at least in part by an unconstitutional intent to target African American voters.”
The law, S.B. 824, requires voters to present a photo ID in order to vote.
In a 2-1 ruling, two Wake County Superior Court judges held that the law violates the state’s constitution “because it was adopted with a discriminatory purpose.”
“North Carolina’s Voter ID law was enacted with the unconstitutional intent to discriminate against African American voters,” the majority wrote.
The two judges cited a 2015 study by Sen. Van Duyn that found at least 5.9% of registered voters lacked identification and that 9.6% of black voters “lacked acceptable ID” compared to just 4.5% of registered white voters under a previous election bill.
The majority also said the law was discriminatory because “since a greater percentage of Black voters live in poverty, Black voters face greater hurdles to acquiring photo ID.”
S.B. 824 required voters in North Carolina to present photo ID, including driver’s licenses, military IDs, and other forms of identification.
Judge Nathaniel Poovey dissented, claiming “not one scintilla of evidence was introduced during this trial that any legislator acted with racially discriminatory intent.”
Poovey said plaintiffs relied on the “past history of other lawmakers and used an extremely broad brush to paint the 2018 General Assembly with the same toxic paint. The majority opinion, in this case, attempts to weave together the speculations and conjectures that Plaintiffs put forward as circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind Session Law 2018-144.”
Poovey noted that plaintiffs “failed to meet their initial burden” to prove the legislature “acted with a racially discriminatory intent.”
Patel Patriot played a clip from a recent Pence speech on last night’s Devolution Power Hour.
https://rumble.com/v19fm33-devolution-power-hour-episode-66.html
You should watch that, and the discussion.
Which brings me to my subject:
WHO ARE THEY WHO THINK THEY ARE PUREST ENOUGH TO THINK THEY CAN RUIN A PERSON'S REPUTATION?
I have taken a ‘vacation’ from ALL news, here, TV, radio, newspapers, laptop, cell phone for a few months...
So the last week I have been listening, same S-—, different day, it hasn't changed one bit and it won't until WE get rid of the ‘think they are the big and powerful fake news outlets’ and we can, turn it off, don't click on it, done accept it...
I look at Former President Trump and what people are trying to do to him, another act of Clarence Thomas, same thing, the RATS and RINOS (RAT ROMNEY, MIKE PENCE) think they are all so mighty that they can ruin someone, well I think it's time to turn the tables...
All this ‘voting fraud’ we have to contend to, we don't have to, each State has their own voting rules, there are more Republican States than Democrat (you notice I said DEMOCRAT, NOT DEMOCRATIC...THERE IS NO DEMOCRATIC ANYTHING) so we can get our States to run an honor voting count...we can volunteer, we can listen, watch...
So after this time off, I have learned something that each of you, I am sure, learned: Nothing Changes...
Rid the Dems, Rinos and dishonest people WE send to D.C.
Dear Lord, bless and protect Clarence Thomas and his family.
Track Politician’s Stock Trades
https://www.capitoltrades.com/trades?page=1&pageSize=20&politician=P000197
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
