BRING THEM BACK!
Posted on 05/31/2022 8:47:15 PM PDT by weston
BRING THEM BACK!
Another angle on the uninviting of the BP.
Bye-done was afraid they wouldn’t show up anyway.
Maybe they had said they didn’t want to even be there.
No matter what happened this is another FAIL for the Regime.
This is the state of the establishment leftist media today.
Pundits at MSNBC think standing up for your 2nd Amendment rights is a bad thing. https://t.co/RDJFYwy3sl— Media Research Center (@theMRC) June 1, 2022
BREAKING, The FBI Maintains a Workspace, Including Computer Portal, Inside the Law Firm of Perkins Coie – The Ramifications are Significant
May 31, 2022 | Sundance
There is very little that surprises me, but this is completely stunning. An FBI whistleblower came forth to inform Rep Jim Jordan and Rep Matt Gaetz that the FBI maintains a workspace inside the law firm of Perkins Coie. {Direct Rumble Link}
In response to a letter sent by Rep. Matt Gaetz and Jim Jordan, Perkins Coie, the legal arm of the DNC and Hillary Clinton, admitted they have been operating an FBI workspace in their Washington D.C. office since 2012. Pay attention to that date, it matters.
This is a huge development. Essentially, what is being admitted in this claim is that a portal existed into FBI databases within the law firm that represents democrats. This means access to FBI database searches exists inside the office of the DNC and Clinton legal group. Think about the ramifications here.
CTH has long claimed there was some kind of direct portal link between the Clinton campaign team and the FBI databases. There were too many trails of extracted non-minimized research evidence in the hands of the Clinton team that CTH could not trace to a transferring FBI official. If Perkins Coie operated a portal in their office that allowed them to conduct search queries of American citizens, then everything would make sense. That access portal is exactly what is being claimed and admitted in this report.
The start date of 2012 is important for several reasons, not the least of which is FISA presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer criticizing the scale and scope of unlawful FBI database access going back to exactly 2012. Keep in mind a FISA-702 search, is simply an unlawful FBI warrantless electronic search of an American (“702” represents the American citizen) into the central database -maintained by the NSA- that contains all electronic data and communication.
I have been in the deep hole of the FISA-702 database search query violations for so long I don’t even need a flashlight.
The report from Matt Gaetz about Perkins Coie access to FBI databases, is in direct alignment with Rosemary Collyer’s prior report on FBI abuses of the database, 702 violations. Notice the dates and scope Judge Collyer references [Source Link].
Read more......
Democrat President Joe Biden’s Department of Justice asked a federal judge this week to overturn a court order earlier this spring that declared the administration’s mask mandate on public transportation to be unlawful.
Thanks for posting.
Beautiful picture and words.
Thank you to everyone who saw #TopGun: Maverick and helped make it a historic opening weekend.— Tom Cruise (@TomCruise) May 31, 2022
#TopGunMaverick officialy broke the Memorial Day Weekend Record With $156 Million on Monday! Outstanding! #TomCruise #TopGun pic.twitter.com/43YB7yrBxp— Tom Cruise News (@TCNews62) May 30, 2022
Good point. As badly as he treat BP, I’m surprised any would want to see him, unless it is to show their disgust.
Thanks for posting.
👍👍
Yes, since this was just a photo op for Bye-done he couldn’t have pictures of the BP turning their backs on him.
And I think they may have done just that.
Why isn’t the LSM asking why Bye-done didn’t tour the border since he was so close?
sundance was on this, from the beginning. He knew, since the days of the FISA Judge, chastising the FIBbers database.
What will become of this? Probably, like everything else....nothing.
Especially when you have “top” RINOs Grahamnesty and Cornball working WITH DEMS, on gun grabbing legislation/red flag laws.
🤬
The family friend, that I’d posted about, last week...and, who was a retired BP, in Uvalde, would likely have joined in.
Maybe not, since he was old school and respected the office. But, this clown puts that premise to a whole new test, and standards.
I’m afraid you are right that nothing will come of this latest illegal act of the left as far as prosecutions anyway.
However, it does expose them and how far they are will go to hang on to power.
We can hope that this portal will be shut down even if no one is prosecuted.
Reminds me of when Hitlery was caught with all the FBI raw data files she had in the WH.
Whether in her hubba bubba’s WH, her home bathroom, or her attorney’s office....Hitlery always manages to have those files handy....doesn’t she?
Embattled Uvalde Schools Police Chief Insists He’s Cooperating With Massacre Probe
By Greg Wilson
•
Jun 1, 2022 DailyWire.com
The Uvalde, Texas, schools police chief who reportedly held back officers even as a maniac slaughtered 19 children and two teachers inside an elementary school last week denied reports he is not cooperating with the Texas Rangers’ ongoing probe of the incident.
Pete Arredondo, chief of police for the Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District, told CNN he regularly speaks with the Texas Department of Safety, which is investigating the school police response to the horrific tragedy at Robb Elementary School.
“I am in touch with DPS everyday,” Arredondo told the news outlet.
The woman belongs in jail.
The Watergate prosecutor had Hitlery pegged way back when, fired her.
Is the GOP trying to lose the ‘22 elections?
There Is No Bipartisan Gun ‘Compromise’ In The Works, Just GOP Capitulation
BY: JOHN DANIEL DAVIDSON
JUNE 01, 2022
Democrats and the corporate media like to call it a “compromise” when they get exactly what they want and Republicans get nothing. Just witness the bipartisan talks underway in the wake of the school shooting in Uvalde, Texas on new gun control legislation.
These talks, which reportedly involve four GOP senators led by Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, are focusing on two new gun control proposals: universal background checks and red flag laws. Whatever one’s opinion about the merits of these policies, it’s a fact that Democrats have long wanted to make it harder for law-abiding Americans to purchase guns and easier for the government to take them away.
Both of these proposals would do just that, while arguably doing almost nothing to prevent the sort of mass shooting we saw last week in Uvalde. One of the policy ideas, so-called “universal background checks,” isn’t a policy so much as a slogan meant to convey an inchoate desire that bad guys not be allowed to buy guns.
As nearly every gun owner in America knows, almost every gun sold in this country already comes with a background check, which is already required under federal law. As my colleague David Harsanyi noted yesterday, lying on your background check or evading it with a straw purchase are already illegal under federal law.
The other idea, a national red-flag law, would empower judges and police to confiscate guns from Americans who have not been charged with, nor committed, any crime at all. What’s more, a person judged guilty of pre-crime under a red-flag law cannot appeal the decision until after his or her guns have been confiscated.
Nineteen states already have some version of red-flag law already on the books, some worse than others, and all relatively new. New York has one, but it didn’t stop the Buffalo shooter from obtaining the guns he used to kill 10 people at grocery store last month. (He also passed a federal background check.)
So much for the policies themselves. The point here is not that they are good or bad ideas but that they are the sort of things Democrats have wanted to do for a long time and haven’t been able to because Republicans have blocked them.
Why have Republicans blocked them? Because too many Republican voters understand that the purpose of such laws is to erode the Second Amendment and eventually take guns from law-abiding Americans who pose no risk of danger to anyone.
But now we have these bipartisan talks underway. Reporting on the talks, The New York Times repeatedly framed them as efforts to strike a “deal” or a “compromise,” noting, for example, how projected GOP gains in the midterms “could inform how willing Republicans will be in the coming days to compromise on gun rights, an issue that has become central to their party.”
But there is in fact no compromise on the table. A compromise is when both parties give up something to get something else. That’s not happening here.
Democrats aren’t talking about how they’re willing to, say, get rid of gun-free zones in schools and colleges that receive federal funding in exchange for Republican support for a national red-flag law. That would be a compromise or a deal, and it would no doubt enrage the base of either party, especially the Democrats’ radical left wing, which is why it’s very unlikely to happen.
Read more.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.