|
Posted on 05/31/2022 8:14:04 PM PDT by ransomnote
Transcript of Riccardo Bosi's warning ["No consent. No consent. No consent"]
Ricardo Bosi explains what's really going on in the Ukraine (TRANSCRIPT and 3 minute video)
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Interesting how another mass shooting occurs when the story of the Perkins Coie SCIF at the FBI is coming out.
mark
here’s today’s X22 reports:
Ep. 2789b - Durham Has It All Is Not Just Saying, The Hammer Is About To Fall
Ep. 2789a - Right On Schedule, [JB] Blames The Fed For Inflation, Trap Set
https://rumble.com/v170php-ep.-2789a-right-on-schedule-jb-blames-the-fed-for-inflation-trap-set.html
News9.com says shooter died by suicide. Now if only some numbskull hadn’t referred to Diaper Joe as “President Biden” (which we all know he’s NOT). Link below:
Agree re weird timing vis-a-vis this shooting, following hot on the hells of the Perkins Coie/FBI SCIF info.
“Hells” should, of course, be “Heels”. Then again, “Hells” fits also . . .
Thank you Ransomnote for keeping this outstanding forum. I don’t post much, but do lurk and read every post.
On a different note, welcome to the retired club Melian. I’ve been a member for exactly one month today. Others have given good advice. What I’ve taken aboard as a neophyte is to have goals and don’t make big commitments before you’ve settled in. All the best for your retirement.
VR/Pat
Durham must have already known about this cozy relationship between the FBI and Perkins Coie before he took Sussman to court. Durham is turning over rocks and exposing some nefarious growth long in the dark.
🦅
That SCIF at P-C office is a bizarre abuse of power
Are there SCIFs at other law firms? Did the SCIF have linkages/comms into the FBI data system? Who would authorize the use of the SCIF each time it was used? Are there records of who was in it and when? Was the Trump administration aware of this SCIF?
‘Take Turns’: New York City Public Health Poster Says Doing Drugs Is Fine If Done Safely
https://dailycaller.com/2022/05/27/new-york-city-heroin-fentanyl-crisis-public-health-encouragement/
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4067959/posts?page=1
EXCLUSIVE: The Majority of the 51 Intel Experts Who Claimed the Hunter Biden Laptop Was Russian Disinformation Have Connections to George Bush Sr.
GATEWAY PUNDIT ^ | 6/1/2022 | joe hoft
I’ll send you some danker memes and help you get banned. Lol!
Next step: mandatory “soma” for everyone.
Tip o the iceberg; we’ll see what Greg Phillips’ info coming up will be.
19,000 Late, Invalid Ballots Were Counted in Arizona 2020 Election: Report
Arizona 2020 Election Results May Have Been Different, Election Integrity Group Says
With the 2022 midterm elections around the corner, scrutiny of the 2020 election continues to raise questions about election integrity, including a newly identified anomaly in Maricopa County, Arizona.
Arizona Law requires that, to be considered valid, ballots must be received by the county no later than 7 p.m. on Election Day.
But newly uncovered records documenting the Maricopa County 2020 general election show that while more than 20,000 ballots were transported from the U.S. Postal Service after Election Day, Maricopa County only rejected 934 late ballots in its “Early Voting Rejections Summary” document.
This means more than 19,000 late, invalid ballots should have been rejected. That is significant because it is enough to potentially sway the results of Arizona’s presidential election, which rested with a final tally of Joe Biden winning the state with 10,457 more votes than Donald Trump.
It is impossible to know if the results would be different if the late ballots had not been counted in Maricopa County.
The Early Voting Rejections Summary is just one of the documents telling the story. County documents were obtained by Verity Vote, a group of citizen volunteers with data research and investigation backgrounds who have been investigating the 2020 election results throughout the country.
Verity Vote recently released a report detailing this investigation.
How Ballots Move
To understand the anomaly, it is important to know how ballots are moved in Maricopa County, which uses dropboxes and early mail-in voting.
A truck driven by a Maricopa County Elections Department employee picks up ballots at least once a day.
The collection truck starts at the Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center. The truck has some space for more ballots but is already loaded with some early in-person ballots and ballots that were placed in a dropbox.
The driver goes to the post office and picks up more ballots, then takes the truck to Runbeck Election Services where all ballots are given an incoming scan.
It is here, at the scan, that the “Inbound Receipt of Delivery” document is generated. This receipt of delivery shows the date, time, and names of the employees delivering and receiving the ballots, and it itemizes the number of ballots that came from the post office, dropboxes, and early in-person voting.
In response to some document requests, Maricopa County made the Receipt of Delivery documents available for public inspection for dates spanning Oct. 13 to Nov. 6, 2020.
From that collection of documents, Verity Vote noticed that documents from Nov. 4, 2020—the day after the election—were missing. Verity Vote requested Maricopa County provide the Receipt of Delivery for that day, first with a few phone calls, then with written requests. It should have been a simple request because all the other dates were already public. But this request went to a county attorney.
“After numerous delays, multiple follow up emails, and phone calls, county employees informed Verity Vote that the records were with legal counsel pending review,” the report says. “It took nearly seven months to get the documents.”
The Nov. 4 Receipt of Delivery shows 18,000 ballots were picked up from the Post Office the day after the Nov. 3 election.
The form has three colors of ink. A Runbeck Election Services employee printed his first name only, Brandon, in blue. The ballots arrived at “9:30” on “11-4-20” and the paper is signed in the same blue ink by the receiver, but the signature is illegible.
A row listed as “lates” should show how many ballots are late. The four columns in the late row have numbers in blue ink but are scribbled over and cannot be read.
Another signature, scrawled in red ink, is also illegible. It denotes the person who delivered the ballots.
Even though the document is dated Nov. 4, one day after the election, at the top of the page, above the margin, someone has written “Election Day” in black ink in what looks like different handwriting from the rest of the page.
The county also documents receiving 1,000 ballots on Nov. 5 and 1,500 ballots on Nov. 6. Combined with the 18,000 ballots found on Nov. 4, the total documented late ballots were 20,500.
A letter from County Recorder Stephen Richer, responding to Verity Vote’s document request, indicated that the Nov. 4 receipt the county provided is not the only receipt for ballots the county received that day.
“This document does not represent the complete universe of Maricopa County inbound receipt delivery forms from Nov. 4, 2020. We cannot be certain, but we believe that the remainder of these forms were transferred to the treasurer’s office to be stored and sealed with ballots,” Richer wrote. If so, it indicates there are more mailed ballots that were not counted in the Early Voting Rejections Summary, and presumably would have been counted in the results.”
Another anomaly is the number of ballots collected Nov. 4, compared to other surrounding days.
Voters were instructed to mail ballots by Oct. 27 to be sure their ballots arrived on time. By Oct. 30, the number of ballots coming by mail dropped sharply, but then spiked the day after the election.
On Oct. 28, the county received 58,500 ballots from the post office, then:
Oct. 29: 14,500
Oct. 30: 10,500
Oct. 31: 6,000
Nov. 1: 1,500
Nov. 2: 1,000
Nov. 3: 2,500—Election Day. In order to be counted and valid, the ballot must be received by the county no later than 7 p.m.
Nov. 4: 18,000 late, invalid ballots
Nov. 5: 1,000 late, invalid ballots
Nov. 6: 1,500 late, invalid ballots
Yet Maricopa County rejected just 934 ballots for lateness.
Maricopa County responded to The Epoch Times’ request for comment with an email promising the communications director in its Elections Department would “reach out.” The Epoch Times will report when they do.
Arizona has 11 electoral votes. In the final tally, Biden had 74 more electoral votes than Trump, according to the official record at the National Archives.
Store where Texas school shooter got rifle was linked to cartel case
nypost ^ | 5/30/2022 | maryann martinez
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4067961/posts?page=1
And another one about the AZ election.
Election Integrity Group Unveils Findings on Ballot Trafficking in Arizona
The election integrity group True the Vote presented Arizona lawmakers with cell phone tracking data showing alleged ballot traffickers visited drop boxes in two of the state’s largest counties no less than 5,700 times during the 2020 election.
“When we started the project, we didn’t know [what we would find],” said Catherine Engelbrecht, the Texas group’s founder and president.
“We began to think through what is a realistic expectation or threshold for when going to a dropbox is too many times. We wanted to focus on a clear, narrow data set [to demonstrate] “extreme outlier behavior.”
The group’s investigators settled on 10 visits as an actual number—but “here, in Arizona, they went an average of 21 times,” Engelbrecht told the panel of state legislators on May 31.
Lawmakers—all Republican—vowed to move forward with HB-2289 to make ballot drop boxes illegal in Arizona.
“The only thing I would like to see come out of this meeting is people going to jail,” said State Rep. Quang Nguyen (R). “I would just like to see people cuffed.”
The presentation was delayed 45 minutes while Arizona Democratic legislators wrangled over proposed gun control.
“This is political grandstanding, which I find is shameful,” said Arizona state Rep. Mark Finchem (R).
“They’re trying to suspend the rules, which is always a bad idea—to bring forward a bill that hasn’t gone to committee, and that has not had any vetting whatsoever. It’s not going to happen.”
During the 90-minute presentation, Engelbrecht and True the Vote data investigator Gregg Phillips, former head of Mississippi’s Department of Human Services, described the group’s investigation into so-called “mules,” illegal ballot runners, and the role NGOs may have played to commit 2020 election fraud.
The investigation focused on two of the state’s largest counties—Maricopa County and Yuma County—and on unique visits to ballot boxes utilizing cell phone tracking technology to develop “patterns of life” for each alleged ballot trafficker.
“We resolved to try to find a path that we could measure that would be useful to law enforcement,” Engelbrecht said.
The study used Oct. 7 and Nov. 3, 2020 as a timeframe, identifying 202 target devices that made 4,242 unique dropbox visits in Maricopa County.
In Yuma County, the study found 1,435 unique dropbox visits by 41 target devices based on cell phone signals, or “pings.”
Engelbrecht said a geofence is around every dropbox to provide a “digital coordinate set” and measure how many times a device passed through the geofence. Measurements are precise to within a meter of contact with a ballot box.
The federal government uses the same tracking technology. Its accuracy is “nearly perfect [like] wearing an ankle bracelet,” Engelbrecht said.
“Friends, it’s happening on all of our phones, which are attached to us at almost all times. Suffice for this purpose and for this time to say the outlier set was so extreme that it warrants serious consideration, one that we hope this body before us will consider,” she said.
Phillips said the web of cell phone signals is “so significant. Your phone is sending regular pings [this] is how all that comes together.”
He added, “It can’t be overstated not to do what the [New York Times] did” in a series of articles on geofencing—”to say we got 50 billion pings and make all these [erroneous] assumptions.”
Phillips said the group’s study sifted through billions of signals, “teasing out” devices based to exclude “false positive” signals.
Dinesh D’Souza illustrated these findings in the new movie “2,000 Mules,” which seeks to expose organized ballot trafficking in the 2020 election.
“We decided to go in on a methodology that uses ad data [embedded] in all of your phones. This is how digital DNA is captured,” Engelbrecht said.
“If there were a subversion of [electoral] process, it would show up in the drop boxes. We believed that to prove it [geospatial data] would be something to focus on. We resolved to look at the ways to prove this.”
True the Vote is investigating alleged 2020 ballot harvesting in Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania electoral jurisdictions as well, and will share its findings with law enforcement officials that could lead to criminal investigations.
Engelbrecht said inaccurate voter rolls provide a “gateway to all your problems” with mass mailing of ballots. She said that issues are more likely to occur at ballot drop boxes because they are not well regulated.
True the Vote recommends Arizona lawmakers commit to clean voter rolls using real-time technology, and eliminate mass mailing of ballots and drop boxes. Or at the very least, drop boxes should be secure with video surveillance technology.
Finally, lawmakers should make the penalty for ballot running something “cheaters will fear,” said Engelbrecht, who views 2020 election fraud as a “vertical grift layers and layers deep.”
“The exploitation targets the most vulnerable communities. This is voter abuse. This is not about Republicans or Democrats. This is about securing the vote,” Engelbrecht said.
Arizona state Rep. Leo Biasiucci (R) said, “Obviously, something is going on. We’ve got to figure out what went wrong, how to fix it, and if you were involved, you should be prosecuted.”
State Sen. Nancy Barto (R) said it is “very scary” for voters not to have confidence in the ballot.
“We are going to get a handle on this,” she said.
State Sen. Walter “Walt” Blackman (R) summed up the solution for Arizona in “HB-2289.”
“After seeing this, we need to move forward with [HB-]2289,” he said to loud applause.
I don’t really want to get banned because I have fun putting out good stuff that gets retweeted. But if I’m going to get at all active on TS I’ll have to stop doing twtter.
Lemme have them dank memes.
Proud to be a club member with you.
Week 1 of retirement: we bought a used camper.
Week 2 will be: figure out how to operate it.
Under 0b0la, a she-congresvermin (Maxipad Waters?) said that there was a huge surveillance system on everyone that was bigger than anyone could imagine. Like she was taunting “I know and you don’t, na na na na naaa na”.
Total paraphrasing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
