Replies

Let me go into a little more detail on the state decertification issue. The Constitution has no procedure for it. A president can be removed by death, resignation, or impeachment by a majority of the House combined with conviction and removal by two thirds of the Senate. The argument that fraud vitiates everything doesn’t overrule procedures that are hard-coded in the Constitution. This is why I don’t think the Supreme Court would get involved; it would look like legislating from the bench.

The first stumbling block is the fact that only a few state legislatures sit full time. Most sit once a year, and a few once a biennium. For a part time legislature to address decertification of a prior presidential election outside its normal legislative session would require the governor of the state to call a special session. A governor who is a Democrat or RINO will not do so. If a special session is called, the Mainstream Media, arguing correctly that decertification would have no legal effect, would execute a full court press to stop it. For those states with initiative, referendum and recall, the Left, aided and abetted by the Mainstream Media, would launch recall petitions to intimidate legislators thinking of decertification. Antifa and BLM would move in to disrupt the legislature by violence. A governor not sympathetic to the cause would take no action, arguing that the protests were “mostly peaceful.”

But let’s say that the scandal of voter fraud is so monstrous that the first state decertifies. A prerequisite would be at least one cable network and one broadcast network willing to break ranks to give honest coverage. As decertification comes up in other states, the forces to stop it would intensify. We would approach a condition of civil war. Which side would police and paramilitary forces take?

The scandal might force Biden and the current Congress to push Harris out, move Trump into the vice presidency and then push Biden out.

But in the presence of intransigence from Congress and the administration, we move to the American people taking matters into their own hands, something like a general strike. Senators and congressmen would find their security personnel overwhelmed as those officeholders faced the dilemma of resigning or being lynched. Would police and paramilitary forces fire into the crowds? At some point, we could see the military coming out of the barracks as a more likely option than a Supreme Court intervention.

This brings up the fact that Wendy Rogers in Arizona said they had been doing this to the voters for a long time. In a post from some months ago, I laid out the case for fraudulent elections, tampered with by both parties, going back 20 years. In addition to an illegitimate president and vice president, we may well have an illegitimate Congress, illegitimate state, county and local officeholders, and even illegitimate school boards. What is needed is a special election of all officeholders nationwide, something not possible within the framework of the Constitution. This is what a military takeover could achieve, along with general voting reform.

But an outright military takeover is itself outside the Constitution, and the optics would be terrible for patriots, history books and the Constitution itself. It would set a dangerous precedent. That’s why I think it won’t actually look like a military takeover. After all, the devolution we are experiencing doesn’t look like devolution. It looks like our current occupation government is firmly in charge – until one day it won’t be. I go back to England’s Glorious Revolution of 1688 for how it might play out.

Just some thoughts of my own.