Posted on 05/01/2022 12:07:42 AM PDT by weston
The question is, how much did Soros pay Durham?
Don’t blame Durham.
He had a biased judge and a biased jury.
Durham Trials Track Trails Through Washington Swamps
https://www.newsmax.com/larrybell/dossier-obama-sullivan/2022/05/25/id/1071483/
The next trial is not in DC.
Maybe he could have done something about who was on the jury, don’cha think?
$oro$ and our tax dollars.
The grift is YUGE.
Who do you think repays $or@$?
The next trial is not in DC.
That’s good news.
What Durham proved
by Byron York, Chief Political Correspondent
May 31, 2022 11:08 AM
WHAT DURHAM PROVED. The trial of Michael Sussmann is before a jury in Washington, D.C. Sussmann is the Democratic lawyer who, according to special counsel John Durham, lied to the FBI in 2016 when, working on behalf of the Hillary Clinton campaign, he tried to plant a derogatory story about Donald Trump. The hope was that the FBI would start an investigation and then the campaign conversation would be: TRUMP IS UNDER FBI INVESTIGATION!
There is no doubt Sussmann lied to the FBI. There is no doubt he is guilty. But the trial is taking place in Washington, perhaps the deepest-blue jury pool in the United States. Durham’s prosecutors are “facing a jury that has three Clinton donors, an AOC donor, and a woman whose daughter is on the same sports team as Sussmann’s daughter,” George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley said recently on Fox News. “With the exception of randomly selecting people out of DNC headquarters, you could not come up with a worse jury.”
So the jury might reject Durham’s evidence — juries are free to do that. Or it might convict. Whatever it does, though, Durham has already made some important points about the actions of the Clinton campaign in the 2016 election.
Subscribe today to the Washington Examiner magazine that will keep you up to date with what’s going on in Washington. SUBSCRIBE NOW: Just $1.00 an issue!
The biggest point Durham has made is that an arm of the Clinton campaign developed a strategy to weaponize the FBI to investigate Clinton’s political opponent. Starting around the time of the 2016 Democratic convention, with the Russian hack of Democratic National Committee emails, the Clinton campaign made a concerted effort to accuse Trump falsely of acting in collusion with Russia. At the Sussmann trial, Robby Mook, Clinton’s campaign manager, testified that effort was focused on feeding information to reporters — the old-fashioned way to spread dirt.
But lawyers working for the campaign went beyond the old-fashioned way. They tried to enlist the FBI in the operation, to spur the investigation. That would turbocharge the story, allowing reporters to say the allegations were so serious that federal law enforcement was investigating.
That’s why, when a team of pro-Clinton researchers came up with a theory that there were suspicious computer connections between a Russian bank, Alfa-Bank, and the Trump campaign, Sussmann took it to the FBI. He did it on behalf of the Clinton campaign. He billed the campaign for the work. Yet he specifically told the FBI that he was not acting on behalf of the campaign, that he was just doing it as a concerned citizen. In September 2016, when Sussmann requested a meeting with then-FBI General Counsel James Baker, Sussmann texted, “Jim — it’s Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and sensitive) I need to discuss. Do you have availability for a short meeting tomorrow? I’m coming on my own — not on behalf of a client or company — want to help the Bureau. Thanks.”
But Sussmann was doing it on behalf of a client — the Clinton campaign.
Besides showing that an arm of the Clinton campaign sought to weaponize the FBI, the Sussmann trial has shown that the FBI was eager to be weaponized. We learned that a senior FBI agent involved in the Trump-Russia investigation, Joe Pientka, sent a note to another agent about the Alfa-Bank tip: “People on the 7th floor to include Director are fired up about this server. Reachout and put tools on...it’s not an option — we must do it.” The FBI building’s seventh floor is where top management, including then-Director James Comey, had offices.
So those are two major revelations from the Sussmann trial: Elements in and around the Clinton campaign sought to weaponize the FBI, and the FBI welcomed the effort — all in the name of defeating the Republican nominee for president.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/what-durham-proved
Ain’t gonna be no next trial, Garland will see to it.
Don’cha think he tried but the cesspool known as DC runs deep.
Trump only got 6% of the vote in DC.
Could be why the left did and continues to do whatever it wants.
They know they will NEVER be held accountable.
Saw this, but can’t post from phone …. Lol ….
👀 pic.twitter.com/F4B6ms5JiD— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 30, 2022
Just wait.....we’ll get them next time. For sure. 100% guarantee. Tik Toc.
FTA
“Despite these admitted ties, Durham did not push for the judge’s recusal.”
Considrting that the demented idiot is saying it, do we even know for dure that Beau is dead?/S
Worse than useless. GOP so-called leaders collude with Dems.
Cernovich
@Cernovich
·
16m
Sussmann verdict is what you expect when the judge stacks the jury with DNC activists. Today is one of the most disgraceful days for the federal judiciary in modern history.
Yes, I’m aware. It still goes down in the book as “acquitted”.
Are they going to appeal?
Mollie
@MZHemingway
·
38m
Corporate media downplayed Sussman trial while its testimony confirmed their own corruption, and that of Clinton and FBI. Now that he’s (as expected) been acquitted, tweets aplenty! they were and are active co-conspirators in one of greatest political scandals in our history.
Definitely unexpected and LOL maybe staged.
This makes me sick to my stomach, why in the hell are WE following any damn laws?? Just LOOK at the poor people from Jan. 6, OMG I am so beyond ANGRY this country is GONE sad to say it but WE ALL know it is the truth!! There is NO LONGER a justice system in this nation, elections are being STOLEN right out in the open with NO CONSEQUENCES proof being shown just like in this trial and NO CONSEQUENCES!! I am so damn glad I am nearing the end of my life my heart is beyond broken!! OH and we ALL KNOW the FBI and CIA are setting up these massive shootings to remove our firearms from us!! Our military WILL NEVER protect us from a tyrannical government NEVER just as the Venezuela military did not protect them they jumped sides just as our military will also do!! We NO LONGER have a constitution it is now just a piece of paper with meaningless writing on it!!
Josh Gerstein
@joshgerstein
·
34m
Durham on Sussmann acquittal: While we are disappointed in the outcome, we respect jury’s decision & thank them for their service. I also want to recognize & thank the investigators & the prosecution team for their dedicated efforts in seeking truth and justice in this case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.