Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dfwgator

FTA
“Despite these admitted ties, Durham did not push for the judge’s recusal.”


6,791 posted on 05/31/2022 9:47:07 AM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6783 | View Replies ]


To: gubamyster

6,793 posted on 05/31/2022 9:50:58 AM PDT by exit82 (Either the Democrat Party will survive or America will survive. But not both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6791 | View Replies ]

To: gubamyster

Has it ever been said why Durham didn’t ask for judges recusal?

Did he figure that it wouldn’t make any difference being that it is DC.


6,813 posted on 05/31/2022 10:25:00 AM PDT by Lakeside Granny (Vote RED~R.emove E.very D.emocrat~D&S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6791 | View Replies ]

To: gubamyster

This is it for me. I got suckered again. I actually thought Durham was going to do something. If I hear one more person tell me that justice is coming, I may do them physical harm.

If anyone tries to put some positive spin on this, saying it’s the way it was supposed to happen, that the “white hats” have the goods and “nothing is going to stop what is coming”, or any more Q fantasies, I may get myself booted for what I’ll say.

Kash Patel gave me my final shot of hopium when he said the evidence was so overwhelming that it was irrelevant who the judge and jury were.

Nothing can stop what is coming, but I don’t think it’s what we think it is.


6,867 posted on 05/31/2022 3:18:42 PM PDT by JudyinCanada (Maranatha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6791 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson