|
Posted on 04/19/2022 11:10:08 PM PDT by ransomnote
6:41 PM · Apr 19, 2022·Twitter Web App
Transcript of Riccardo Bosi's warning ["No consent. No consent. No consent"]
Ricardo Bosi explains what's really going on in the Ukraine (TRANSCRIPT and 3 minute video)
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
YAY!! Good to hear from you and that your spirits are good.
Did you read Patel Patriot’s new Devolution 20? It is hugely encouraging, the end part and link were posted I think yesterday, here they are again in case you missed:
Devolution - Part 20
Trump Justice
https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution-part-20s=r
Closing
Imagine the following hypothetical scenario. You wake up one morning, turn on the news (again, a hypothetical scenario) to hear that well over half of congress, the entire Biden administration, many local government officials from around the United States, many individuals from major corporations, MSM news outlets, etc. have all been indicted for a swath of various crimes.
In other words, what would happen if the entire political establishment, or at least a good chunk of it, were to end up being indicted by the ongoing Durham investigation? Remember what John Huber’s scope was. Basically, matters relating to the Clinton Foundation and the 2016 election.
You can tie pretty much everything to that vague yet broad scope because all of it is related - all of those scandals involve pretty much the same players.
What if one of those indictments is for criminal activity relating to the 2020 election?
There are mountains of evidence the 2020 election was stolen. I believe our military has some of that evidence. What if people were indicted for it, and the military comes forth and shows the evidence they have? What if they already gave it to John Durham as the memos Trump issued directed them to?
Remember the Time magazine article:
[Time article snip: The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election]
These are the people I’m talking about. What if all the RINO’s in every state legislature holding back the decertification process are indicted? What if all those lawyers and corrupt judges, those Non-profit groups, those ballot stuffing mules - what if they all get indicted?
Definitive proof comes forth through these indictments that there was election fraud. How will the MSM spin this when they are also indicted as part of it?
How do we move forward as a country?
This would be the constitutional crisis I have been talking about. I could be wrong here but as far as I could find, there was no method for indicted individuals in our government to be removed from office other than to be voted out by their peers or resigning themselves.
I don’t imagine anybody would resign. Why would they? They would be handing over the little power they have left. Remember, an indictment is not a conviction, it just shows that a Grand Jury found enough evidence to justify a criminal trial. There are instances where indicted individuals are found innocent. That is why there is no rule in place to remove indicted members. Innocent until proven guilty.
A scenario like this would lead us to some sort of special election - a constitutional reset of sorts. It’s the only way I could see us getting out of a mess of this magnitude.
Is something like this what Trump is waiting for? A wave of indictments would shock the nation. It doesn’t matter what your political beliefs are because the indictments would cover both sides of the aisle. A scenario like this would be the taping open of the eyelids for the willfully ignorant, or otherwise brainwashed normie who has been blindfolded the past 6 years. Nobody would be able to look away.
Trump assisted the Durham investigation of Spygate and “certain related matters” (which he has been investigating in some form or another since at least April of 2017) by allowing our intelligence agencies (INCLUDING THE DOD) to declassify relevant material.
Trump issued a memorandum just so he could specifically declare that such declassified material can be used in Grand Jury proceedings. Grand Jury proceedings lead to sealed indictments, and that is the key. Literally thousands of individuals could have been indicted via sealed indictments and nobody would know, even those indicted, until they become unsealed. This is how you shock the nation awake and expose the magnitude of the corruption that has been perpetrated by the cabal for decades, if not longer.
I’ve always considered the Durham investigation to be just another piece of the devolution puzzle.
Is it possible the Durham investigation is part of the endgame?
THE BEST IS YET TO COME
Excellent! 👍
E is bloodline. Czebotar and he were in the same circle/cell as children; her testimony meshes with the Shalom Girl testimony.
Some Durham bits for the ping list. There is a lot of very technical stuff out there that makes me dizzy. I may try to claw together some in a few days. First, the conclusion of Patel Patriot’s Devotion 20, posted here:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4056395/posts?page=1421#1421
From Gen.Flynn
https://t.me/s/RealGenFlynn/2484
I’ve been reviewing the Durham investigation and i do believe he has Halper in his sights.
For those that have not read this AUG 2020 article by Steven Schrage, the guy who ran a conference I attended at Cambridge while serving as the Director of DIA, everything for those following this epic crime becomes even more clear.
Steven Schrage-“Flynn’s Tag Team Take Down
Perhaps nothing better illustrates the Cambridge Four’s roles — or is more urgent given Flynn’s legal hearing August 11 — than the takedown of Trump’s national security advisor. Starting in 2016, Halper made odd requests for me to brief him and others on Trump’s team. He even had me research Trump, allegedly as part of my thesis work, even though my thesis was focused on past, not present, presidents.
In these discussions I stressed that Flynn was indispensable. He was perhaps the only campaign advisor who both had Trump’s personal trust and the deep intelligence experience necessary to expose hidden problems in the intelligence community. At one point, I even recall telling Halper that taking Flynn out would be like “beheading” Trump’s team. I had no idea I had been unintentionally aiding a spy preparing the guillotine and helping lead Flynn to exactly such a beheading.”
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/the-spies-who-hijacked-america?s=r
Substack
And this article:
Trump Speaks Out on Durham Probe: ‘Just The Beginning”
https://resistthemainstream.org/trump-reacts-to-durham-court-filings-makes-a-prediction/
Donald Trump is predicting that the recent court filings from Special Counsel John Durham are “just the beginning” of what’s to come.
Trump reacted to reports that Durham said in a court filing that lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a tech company to “infiltrate” servers belonging to Trump Tower and the Trump White House in an effort to establish a “narrative” linking Trump to Russia.
“It looks like this is just the beginning, because, if you read the filing and have any understanding of what took place, and I called this a long time ago, you’re going to see a lot of other things happening, having to do with what, really, just is a continuation of the crime of the century,” Trump told Fox News. “This is such a big event, nobody’s seen anything like this.”
“Who would think a thing like this is even possible?” Trump said. “Durham is also coming up with things far bigger than anybody thought possible—Nobody ever thought a thing like this would be even discussed, let alone an act like this committed.”
Rep. Jim Jordan ripped those who pushed the phony “Trump-Russia collusion” narrative following the latest filing last Friday by special counsel John Durham, which indicated key evidence used to support the conspiracy was not feasible.
According to the special counsel’s filing, he revealed his investigation thus far has found inauthentic “user-generated” data on devices, adding that the CIA said the data that purportedly showed links between the former president and Russian banks “was not technically plausible,” “did not withstand technical scrutiny,” “conflicted with [itself],” and was “user-created and not machine/tool generated.”
“The CIA knew as early as 2017 that the Trump/Russia collusion data was not ‘technically plausible’ and was ‘user-created.’ In other words, it was made up. But Democrats and the media told you otherwise!” said Jordan in a Twitter post.
The Daily Wire adds:
Allegations of collusion with Russia dogged former President Donald Trump during his campaign and throughout his presidency. Ex-special counsel Robert Mueller for three years investigated claims that the Trump campaign had illegally coordinated with Russian agents to influence the 2016 election. Mueller eventually concluded that no such evidence exists.
Attorney Michael Sussmann, who previously worked for the Seattle-based law firm Perkins Coie, approached the FBI, under what Durham alleges were false pretenses, with information on potential Trump/Russia collusion. Sussmann took what he said could be evidence of coordination between Trump Tower in New York and Alfa-Bank, one of the largest private banks in Russia.
The CIA, identified in the filing as “Agency-2,” knew in 2017 that at least part of the information that Sussmann had given to federal investigators was not “technically plausible” and was “user-created,” according to Durham’s Friday filing.
And one more:
Former DNI Expects More Indictments to Come From Classified Durham Docs
Former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) John Ratcliffe said that there are still many more classified documents that should be released in connection to special counsel John Durham’s investigation, which he said will appall the public if they’re declassified.
“I expect there to be a lot more indictments to be forthcoming from John Durham besides the ones that have trickled out so far. And that’s based upon documents, some of which—many of which—are not yet declassified,” Ratcliffe told the Charlie Kirk Show.
When Ratcliffe was still in office as the nation’s top intelligence official, he announced in October 2020 that he provided about 1,000 pages of materials to the Department of Justice to aid Durham.
Currently, Durham has two active prosecutions that are ongoing as part of his probe into the origins of the Trump–Russia collusion narrative. Last year, he charged former Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann with lying to the FBI, and weeks later, he charged Russia analyst Igor Danchenko with lying to the bureau. Both men have pleaded not guilty.
“The coordinated effort here that took place in 2016 was wide and broad. I think it involved folks in the Clinton campaign, in the Democratic national party, elected officials, media officials, folks that coordinated—intelligence community officials, and on down the line,” Ratcliffe added in the interview, published last week.
“I’m not saying that every single one of those folks have criminal liability or exposure,” said Ratcliffe, a former Texas congressman. “I’m just saying this was a very coordinated effort, and the more and more the public finds out about the things that I’ve seen that remain classified, they’ll be more and more appalled by those efforts in 2016.”
On April 20, Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign filed court papers to intervene in Durham’s case against Sussmann after federal prosecutors sought to compel the Democratic National Committee, Clinton’s campaign, and other associates to produce documents for Sussmann’s upcoming trial.
The campaign “asserts its attorney-client privilege and the attorney-work-product protection with respect to all documents and information under the control of Perkins Coie or any of its consultants, including Fusion GPS” and “is not waiving any of its privileges, and it opposes the government’s motion to compel,” John Podesta, a longtime Democratic operative and the former chairman of the Clinton campaign, told the court in one filing last week.
Robby Mook, who was Clinton’s campaign manager, said that Sussmann’s law firm, Perkins Coie, gave “legal services and legal advice” that entailed “fact-finding and research” against then-candidate Donald Trump.
If you read Patel Patriot’s new Devolution article, he talks about arrests. And from what I glean here and there (details not retained though) there is evidence on what was done and by whom, and Dinesh D’Souza’s documentary is coming out very soon, I assume a lot of evidence in it.
Umm, with all due respect, no.
Depp was quoted as asking when the last time an actor assassinated a president while Trump was in office.
I’m not buying what you’re selling.
“ Disclaimer:
Information on this website is for informational and educational and entertainment purposes. This website contains humor, parody, and satire. We have included this disclaimer for our protection, on the advice on legal counsel.”
Another way of looking at it is that they make the satire claim to protect themselves from lawsuits while publishing the truth. I surely don’t know, but with all that has gone on for the past several years, I’m very cautious about taking things at face value.
I generally don’t care what actors say about politics. If I did I’d have nothing to watch. There are exceptions to that rule.
-SB
#Slippin
The role of the medieval court jester, right?
“ I generally don’t care what actors say about politics. If I did I’d have nothing to watch. There are exceptions to that rule.”
I’ve almost completely abandoned Hollywood. I live my life outside their influence. Knowing what a perverted cesspool they (in general) are, why would I want to support them? I certainly don’t need TV. I have reality to watch instead.
Good one!
All I’m saying is if I have to pick between Amber Heard and Johnny Depp, it’s Depp all the way. Everyone says something stupid at least once in their life. And he does an awesome David Bowie impression.
-SB
Bookmark
What I have read about birth control pills (written from a naturopathic perspective) says that taking hormone pills interferes with a woman's natural selection regarding partners. Things like smell and pheromones, meaning she can actually choose someone whom she finds appealing while on the Pill, but once she comes off it, she realizes they are "incompatible." I've even heard about studies where women who are on the pill tend to choose "Beta" males, as opposed to women who are not on the pill being more prone to select "Alpha" male types. So if she is on the pill when she first gets married and suddenly stops in order to become pregnant... it makes sense that it could result in increased unhappiness with the partner she selected.
Thanks for the heads-up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
