Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn.

I once read a book on the creation of Myers-Briggs. I forget the name and author. It is possible the book still exists with my stuff at my father’s house.

Anyway, the author argued that the test was invented by a housewife who found Jung fascinating and that it was all hokum. Her ideas were basically taken up by someone who saw marketing potential in pushing the test to companies as a way to screen employees and make a fast buck in pushing the idea that it would be a good basis for hiring and firing decisions.

There was a true story in the book that always stuck out to me. One of the big rental furniture/appliance centers fired a whole bunch of managers because they had the wrong personality. The company was bought out and new management insisted on testing all managers. Some were found not to be “sensitive” enough.

Instead of going off past performance data and how well the managers did based on retention of subordinates and how many subordinates they helped develop into managers themselves and rational stuff such as that, they decided only the results of Myers-Briggs mattered.

The company suffered a lot in terms of sales after the mass firing because the new people were incompetent and over sensitive to criticism.


2,021 posted on 03/12/2022 10:08:51 AM PST by CheshireTheCat ("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1995 | View Replies ]


To: CheshireTheCat
I have encountered this testing fetish in job searches recently. I have since concluded that if someone requires me to do a personality test during their interview process, it's not someone I wish to work for.

I also had a situation at my current workplace where they wanted us to test ourselves and then compare the results with each other on a chart. All "in fun," of course. And it was kind of interesting to see how the majority of the marketing people fell into one bucket while the creatives mostly fell into another, with a few outliers.

But now, two months later, I am seeing discussions of giving certain people projects because "their personality type is more suited to developing processes." Hmm. I think I see a pattern here. In the future, I will opt out of any personality testing just like I opted out of "vaccination."

2,028 posted on 03/12/2022 10:26:37 AM PST by ponygirl (An Appeal to Heaven )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2021 | View Replies ]

To: CheshireTheCat

Cheshire, ISTP?


2,039 posted on 03/12/2022 10:40:19 AM PST by Oratam ("It's not a war. It's a pageant.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2021 | View Replies ]

To: CheshireTheCat

It reminded me of being a fad that people or companies tried to use to categorize people in an attempt to understand or work with them. IMO it’s premise was that one’s personality was “written” in stone. In my experience people can change as they get older or gain more life experience. A young introvert may become an extrovert as they get older or vice versa. I remember in my travails companies, especially contract temp agencies or consulting companies, using this test when it was the new “thing” in the business world.

A better book on business personalities IMO is “Snakes in Suits: Understanding and Surviving the Psychopaths in Your Office” by Dr. Babiak and Dr. Hare. I’m jaded about the corporate world, but this book describes many bosses and upper management personnel I crossed paths with when I worked in the corporate environment.


2,046 posted on 03/12/2022 10:47:13 AM PST by Sobieski at Kahlenberg Mtn. (All along the watchtower fortune favors the bold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2021 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson