Posted on 02/16/2022 6:01:38 AM PST by Scarlett156
On the heels of a federal indictment alleging that Hillary Clinton’s campaign spied on Donald Trump, even while he was president, former Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard is not only shocked, she is one of the few Democrats to speak out about what must happen next.
Last week, special counsel John Durham unveiled an indictment alleging that Hillary Clinton’s campaign hired a tech company to “infiltrate” Donald Trump’s computer servers and to spy on Trump not only while he was a candidate, but even after he won the White House — all in an effort to push the false claim that Trump was working hand-in-hand with the Russians.
According to Durham, billing records show that Hillary paid campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann to tap into Trump’s campaign servers and spy on him. If this is true, Gabbard says, Hillary must be held accountable.
(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalistpapers.org ...
Pls see my #48.
That may help you understand her motivations.
All style no substance. When TG officially abandons the D party, then she can talk to me about such issues as corruption. When she has seen the light on such things as universal basic income, and the convenience killing of babies, and when she regrets having endorsed Biden for the presidency...
Not gonna happen. With a history like that, she’s only good for the D party.
And being a Hindu, she’s unlikely to experience the sort of spiritual event that would transform her.
In other words it would take a miracle.
She has just as liberal a voting record as Bill Clinton did. Liberals just virtue signal when they’re talking, they don’t really mean it, as established by their voting records. Actions speak louder than words.
Tulsi sees the Democratic Party on the verge of extinction as its leadership has moved hard left if not toward Marxism. She also knows that this leftward lurch of the party has left many traditional Democrats who do not agree with these leftist views either having to align themselves with the Republicans or have no party. I think her strategy may be to be the vanguard of a reformed Democratic Party more in keeping to the party of JFK.
Tulsi is the real embodiment of everything feminist women claim they want women to be but when they actually see it, the Dem feminists reject it.
She’s leftist but follows after her mother’s Buddhist beliefs. So prepare to stay baffled. Democrat feminists certainly are. She’s the real deal, feminism wise, that they claim they are striving for but but when they see it, they don’t like it!
Some “Buddhist” master might have some wise saying about Gabbard’s effect on other Dem feminist women! What say you...”grasshoppah”? LOL!
Put Manchin in that category too!
I could see a Manchin-Gabbard ticket riding to the Rat rescue in 2024 if things get bad enough for the Rats.
She is more Hindu apparently...so the joke is on me!
She’s right.
I could have sworn I saw Patch listed as Schwabian Tool by someone here, but it was Kinzinger? Huh.
Clinton damaged her chances in the last elections causing a lot of Hillary supporters not to back Gabbard. Tulsi had dared pull on the wig of Hillary by accusing her of mischief. Clinton accused Tulsi of being in league with Trump and Russia at a critical moment in the campaigns.
Tulsi has been waiting for revenge and now she can pile on!
Tulsi is one of the best the Dem’s have and while very liberal she is not anti military and not anti American and will compromise. We haven’t seen the last of her. Some have hoped she would come over to “our” side but she would be a Liz Cheney or a Murkowski at best.
From a Vox article in part from October 2019...
“Hillary Clinton emerged from relative political obscurity last week to claim that Tulsi Gabbard, a Democratic presidential candidate and member of Congress from Hawaii, was “the favorite of the Russians” prepping for a third-party spoiler run during a podcast interview. She went so far as to imply that the representative was “a Russian asset.”
Gabbard fired back by calling Clinton “the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party.” In Gabbard’s telling, her party’s 2016 nominee was behind “a concerted campaign to destroy my reputation ... through your proxies and powerful allies in the corporate media and war machine.”
“It’s now clear that this primary is between you and me,” Gabbard, who is at 1.2 percent in the RealClearPolitics primary polling average, concluded. “Don’t cowardly hide behind your proxies. Join the race directly.”
This is a bizarrely intense fight given that these two are members of the same party. Clinton suggesting Gabbard is the Kremlin’s chosen agent for destroying the Democrats in 2020? Gabbard accusing Clinton of being the puppet master behind a massive conspiracy against her? Are these people serious?”
This what caused Gabbard to fall from grace. Tulsi is the real embodiment of everything feminist women claim they want women to be but when they actually see it, the Dem feminists reject it.
Maria Bartiromo seems oddly out of place with that group of leftist globalist pukes.
Flimsey Grahamnesty has an R after his name and he is a duplicitous snake.
Just as you failed to answer mine when I listed a number of Gabbards recent positions and asked which ones you disagreed with...so don't presume to lecture me about a failure of your own making.
She’s a long time player on Team Dem. Even serving as Vice chair of the DNC from 2013 to 2016 and later resigned to ENDORSE Senator Bernie Sanders for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination.
Lol...anyone who was paying attention in 2016 knows that "Team Dem" was Hillary Clinton, NOT Bernie Sanders...and that Gabbard ran her own independent grassroots campaign for President in 2020. She's an outsider, as in outside the establishment.
-btw The entire left/right paradigm is a construct designed by the elites to keep Americans divided. If Gabbard is good for anything, its for exposing posers like you to the light of day. I'll wager you've got a poster of Liz Cheney hanging in your closet.
She often pontificates on geopolitical and military issues but look up her active duty history and tell me where her “expertise’ comes from. She served honorably, but in mundane jobs.
Ok...maybe its a poster of H. R. McMaster.
Since you won’t answer my question I’ll answer yours.
Start by telling me which of her positions I listed earlier you disagree with...and why.
That was my original question and one that you've been avoiding.
So is Eyepatch McCain (Dan Crenshaw)
Eyepatch McCain had his picture and profile scrubbed.
He is one of them, but realized it would not play well in Texas.
In case you missed it the first time...here’s a partial list of things Tulsi Gabbard has spoken out about recently...tell me what you disagree with here.
Supports the Rittenhouse verdict
Blames Biden for disunity in USA
Applauds McCauliffe losing in Virginia
Tells Mayor of Chicago to resign
Attacks Gavin Newsome
Attacks Adam Schiff
Calls CIA domestic terrorists
Attacks removing gendered language in Congress
Sponsored a bill to ban biological men from women’s sport
Cosponsored bill to repeal the Patriot Act
Sponsored the Born Alive amendment
Supports breaking up Big Tech
Supports the Truckers movement
Thanks for posting, and doing the research.👍
Dem party on the edge of extinction?? Hardly. The Left is advancing.
Didn’t clinton accuse Tulsi of being a Russian asset recently?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.