Posted on 02/12/2022 9:11:52 AM PST by Enlightened1
In the presentation with Garland Favorito at VoterGA on Wednesday, February 9, 2022, a special guest was introduced by the name of Bryan Geels. Mr. Geels was hired by the Trump team in Georgia to review the results of the 2020 Election in that state. The Trump team sued the Georgia Secretary of State who certified the fraudulent results.
In the case of Trump vs. the Georgia Secretary of state, the Trump team used much of Geels’s work included in the documents in the court case. Mr. Geels shared with Favorito on Wednesday:
My name is Brian Geels and I was one of the main experts on the Trump v Raffensperger lawsuit, which was the Trump lawsuit that contested the certified results in the 2020 Election in Georgia…[Explains credentials] …I want to remind everyone that the standard of proof in Georgia in an election contest is doubt. We don’t have to prove fraud although there is plent of that kind of evidence. Data analytics itself cannot prove fraud on its own.
My opinion was that after looking at the data published by the Secretary of State on his website that we found enough irregularities and illegalities in the data that it would be impossible for one to truly know who won the election that was decided by less than 12,000 votes and there were 5 million votes counted in this election. So an error rate of 0.0024% would change the outcome.
One of the main tactics that the Secretary of State’s office took to defend itself against the points I raised in my report that was used in the President’s lawsuit is that, what I call the misdirection play. I watched this play out first hand as Secretary Raffensperger hid behind a friendly media disinterested in actually the claims made in the President’s lawsuit during the months that followed the election. I know this because the claims made in my affidavit were and still are public. And there were a bunch of media companies who wrote news articles about my expert testimonty [media listed]. None of these media companies writing investigative pieces called me to ask for context or comment and yet they still used my name in their articles and stated their opinions on the matter without consulting experts on both sides of the issue.
See more details of Geels results in the video below. Starting at the 52:30 mark below you can hear Geels presentation and results.
https://rumble.com/embed/vrs46d
The FBI needs to check Raffensperger's and Kemp's off-shore accounts, but of course, The FBI is probably more corrupt than they are.
Indeed. IMO, those two are nothing but outright criminals and they colluded with Democrats to throw the 2020 election results in Georgia over to Democrats. Both of them MUST be primaried in their respective primary elections this May.
The fibbies need to check the fibbies’ off-shore accounts...
‘Anyways’
They already did that. Results: "Yep, the money is all there."
Yet the politicians, judges, DOJ, homeland security, FBI, etc., sit quietly and do nothing. Destroy them all! Your country, your vote and your vision of this nation was stolen. Should be an executable offense, yet they remain in power and laugh at us.
“Yet the politicians, judges, DOJ, homeland security, FBI, etc., sit quietly and do nothing.”
- because they’re united as a team - against us and against Trump.
My hearing is bad and the audio quality is poor. Would someone post a tl;dl summary of Geels’s points?
In particular, I read that he was including, as fraudulent voters, people who had moved out of Georgia. The criticism is that Georgians who go out of state to attend college or serve in the military are still entitled to vote at home, so his inclusion of them as fraudulent voters is wrong. Did he address that?
Is RAFFYS WIFE a DEMOCRAT or is it just HIM?
Dude, the slides with Garland's commentary (and I agree the audio is unforgivably awful) are all you need. "False Introductory Comments" refers to Raffensberger's post-election cover-up, his 10-page letter to the Georgia Congressional members and the Georgia General Assembly, that is why that is the red headline on the PPT slides, while below in the body of the slides are the details of Favoritos' refutation of Raffensberger's lies and obfuscations:
p
The car of his daughter’s boyfriend spontaneously exploded. What happened to that story? Why isn’t that dog barking?
After that why would any money need to be exchanged.
Gee! Will my car blow up just for asking these questions?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.