Posted on 01/14/2022 8:55:57 PM PST by ransomnote
A ground-breaking scientific study has found that countries recording the fewest COVID-19 deaths in 2020 before vaccinations, experienced “hundreds or thousands of percentage increases in total deaths” after COVID-19 vaccinations were introduced.
The study conducted by K. Beattie, of the University of Alberta, found that 89.84% of the 145 countries experienced a negative impact after COVID-19 vaccinations were made available.
This led to the conclusion that “The statistically significant and overwhelmingly positive causal impact after vaccine deployment [..] on the total deaths and total cases per million should be highly worrisome for policymakers (source).
Interestingly, it has been said that this study was made available before the U.S. Supreme Court hearing that blocked the OSHA vaccine or test mandate as the study found that in the United States, COVID-19 vaccinations account for an increased transmission rate of 38% and a 31% increase in death rate, it would have been criminal had the case not voted against the mandate rule.
The researcher of the study “Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A Big Data Analysis of 145 Countries,” said that “policymakers and mainstream news anchors have promised the public that the COVID19 vaccine rollout worldwide would reduce symptoms, and thereby cases and deaths associated with COVID-19”.
Due to the vaccine rollout still being in progress a large amount of public data was available enabling analysis to be undertaken to determine whether the public policy treatment produced the desired effect. In order to do so, the researcher implemented a Bayesian causal analysis, comparing both pre-and post-treatment periods.
According to Beattie, the results indicated that the treatment (vaccine administration) has a strong and statistically significant propensity to causally increase the values in either y1 [variable chosen for deaths per million] or y2 [variable chosen for cases per million] over and above what would have been expected with no treatment.
y1 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+115/-13), which means 89.84% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total deaths per million associated with COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation [vaccines].
y2 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+105/-16) which means 86.78% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total cases per million of COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation”(source).
The study also found that it was countries such as Thailand, Vietnam, Mongolia, Taiwan, etc that had experienced few COVID-19 deaths in the year 2020 were the ones who appeared to have fared the worst of all countries after vaccine administration.
“The causal impact results from vaccine administration seen in these countries [is] hundreds or thousands of percentage increases in total deaths and cases per million,” according to the researchers.
“We can be most statistically confident in due to the direct increase of COVID-19 associated deaths and cases after vaccine administration, where prior to vaccine administration there were few or none.”
The researcher observed that many countries that reported high cases and deaths associated with COVID-19 during 2020 and early 2021 and assumed that they had appeared to have largely achieved natural immunity by late spring of 2021 in the Northern Hemisphere, which is why many of their trend lines go flat for a time.
Unfortunately, once the vaccine administration started for the general population, or shortly thereafter, those trend lines began to increase again in many countries, and unnaturally so in the middle or towards the end of summer in the Northern hemisphere or in countries where previously there had been very few if any cases or deaths.
Normally, seasonal die-off from pneumonia, influenza, or COVID-19 is in the winter, so this spike that appears in many countries after vaccine administration at this time of the year or in countries with no previous outbreaks is highly suspect as not being a natural trend but rather vaccine-induced.
Although attributing the results to the waning effect of COVID-19 vaccine protection and the amount of “breakthrough” cases, the researcher argues that together with the “overwhelming” and “historically unprecedented” quantity of reports of vaccine adverse events in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), (over 16,000 reported deaths at the time of writing) suggests a “highly untested vaccine”
The researcher also made a particularly specific warning to those who create policy and impose mandates due to the fact that their study verifies the correlation between vaccinations and a “substantial increase in death.”
Vaccine mandates were predictably criticised, Beattie states that “If they ever were ethical, which this author disagrees with strongly based on scientific, medical, and research ethics that regard the patient rights to informed consent and non-prejudcial refusal of treatment or experimentation as iterated and agreed to under the Nuremberg Code (Code 1998) and the Human Rights Declaration on Bioethics, as inalienable, essential, and non-negotiable, vaccine mandates under these conditions and results are beyond unethical at this point.”
The author has generously shared all results, data, plots, and R code included in this study for the easy replication by others.:
To access all files please refer to this Google Drive link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/
1xOphw78-BhsMly09lpxCVPZ-WGieMSqO?usp=sharing
All Causal Impact figures as compiled into multiple PDF pages can be downloaded here: https://drive.
google.com/file/d/1lX3NVqY-sbxVLM81lgK5f6I5ny9c6zGL/view?usp=sharing
Was 9/11 an inside job? Do you think the kids at Sandy Hook were crisis actors?
I am trying to summon up my Philosophy Logic Courses from a very long ago. I seem to recall that a Tautological Proof began with the assumption of a negative, then steps were taken in order to methodically prove the ‘negative.’
If the negative could be unproved, then the Proof was determined to be a positive. It the ‘positive’ could not be proved in that fashion then the negative was then ‘proved.’ I know that I no longer have those text books but I may still have my notes.
Don’t listen to him but I don’t hate people who do. You have namecalling and nothing else.
I’m gonna die. I took the vax, like seven times.
YOU KILLED ME WITH YOUR VACCINE
YOU KILLED ME WITH YOUR VACCINE
YOU MURDERER
Ten times would have saved you.
Who tha fk asked you?
Why the faak do you care if others have been vaccinated? If you don't want to get the vaccine, DON'T. But, stop pestering others that did.
The source of the fallacy is the assumption that something is true unless proven otherwise. The person making a negative claim cannot logically prove nonexistence. And here's why: to know that a X does not exist would require a perfect knowledge of all things (omniscience).
Are you writing from the afterlife?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.