Posted on 01/01/2022 1:44:52 AM PST by weston
Something may be putting pressure on your bladder when you are laying down.
Unfortunately, he and his dear wife are libs and we don’t dare go there.
It would cause a rift in the family I’m afraid.
They both are very inteligent and sooner or later the truth will sink in.
Thanks for the prayers.
On your FIL? Will that work on everyone?
“DOJ & FBI are creations of Congress. Congress has the power to dissolve them.”
They created monsters.
Lol I think I know what it is.
Try sleeping on your side?
I don’t sleep on my side as much as I could, so I will try that.
Prince Andrew Loses Bid To Dismiss Pedo Lawsuit
US District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan sided with Giuffre’s lawyers, who had argued that a 2009 settlement Giuffre signed with Epstein for $500,000 - in which she agreed not to sue anyone linked to the convicted pedophile who could be a “potential defendant.” Kaplan ruled that the agreement was only signed for Epstein’s benefit, and not that of a “third party” like Andrew.
Andrew’s motion to dismiss on these grounds was “denied in all respects” by Kaplan, as the court “cannot rewrite the 2009 Agreement to give the defendant rights where the agreement does not clearly manifest an attempt to create them.”
This bad news for Andrew was compounded last week, after the Queen of England reportedly refused to foot his legal bills, forcing him to liquidate a Swiss chalet in a fire sale.
More from Jonathan Turley, who’s not so sure this ruling will stick:
We discussed the novel arguments put forward by Prince Andrew, including a sweeping waiver of future claims by Giuffre in a settlement with Epstein. As we discussed earlier, the long-secret 2009 settlement contains a provision that would seem to favor Prince Andrew in seeking dismissal. In exchange for $500,000, Giuffre agreed not only to release Epstein from any liability but any “other defendants” associated with him. Giuffre agreed to “remise, release, acquit, satisfy, and forever discharge the said Second Parties and any other person or entity who could have been included as a potential defendant (‘Other Potential Defendants’) from all, and all manner of, action and actions” that she may bring, whether “state or federal.”
That is pretty sweeping and this ruling could create major appellate issues. Prince Andrew argued that he is clearly a “potential defendant” as defined by the agreement. Indeed, given his close relationship to Epstein, he was likely one of the figures in mind when Epstein sought the broad language.
Kaplan worked mightily to avoid that conclusion. She insisted that it is not clear that the 2009 settlement benefits Prince Andrew. She asked “what is a ‘potential defendant’ as distinguished from a ‘defendant’?”
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/prince-andrew-loses-bid-dismiss-pedo-lawsuit
Prayers!! Not an easy road, and I pray for the very best, in everything....decisions, procedures, recovery, and, peace of mind for you and your family.
This is not so dandy for randy Andy. A long dirt nap may come in handy.
I understand. Mentioning it now would make it worse.
Yes, it is in teh FLCCC protocols, which is why it caught my attention. IIRC, Jane has been doing this, as have I.
“Iodine nasal spray/drops: Use 1 % povidone-iodine commercial product
as per instructions 2–3 x daily. If 1 %-product not available, must first dilute the more widely available 10 %- solution6 and apply 4–5 drops to each nostril every 4 hours. (No more than 5 days in pregnancy.)”
Just got through spending the morning with a fam member, at doc’s appointment, labs, etc. .... and, I did my iodine nasal spray before and when I got back home.
Glad to see they’re using this method, at his facility, as well.
Yea, I don’t do it every day, but whenever DH is exposed to someone sick at work, or when I’m out and about
I just do a qtip swab in each nostril, I don’t do a spray
“The stock market keeps going up,”
I don’t understand that. But then I never did understand much about the market. But I would think with all these people not working, companies not being able to get supplies, that they couldn’t be making a whole lot of money. I must be wrong.
ROME—The messages started popping up on Telegram a few days after Italy announced a new vaccine mandate requiring everyone over age 50 to be vaccinated against COVID-19 or risk hefty fines and even termination from their jobs.
Here in the first epicenter of the pandemic outside of China, Italy has paid a hefty price with lockdowns that have crippled the economy and the deaths of more than 140,000 people. Vaccine mandates have become the primary strategy in moving forward, yet a small number of people continue to resist.
The only alternative to getting vaccinated is having recovered from the infection, which must be registered on a person’s national health card. “I am urgently looking for a positive and I am willing to pay,” one desperate anti-vaxxer wrote, according to Italian police who are cracking down on the clandestine COVID meetups and other scams ahead of the Feb. 1 deadline for the over-50 vaccine mandate.
Soon after the announcement of the new law, enterprising opportunists started offering COVID parties where people who tested positive for the disease mix and mingle with those who want to catch it—one racket in Tuscany even includes a truffle dinner with Barolo wine, along with a positive-testing infection for around $150.
Other scams have also emerged. Two people were arrested in Rome after one man who was COVID positive used the health card of someone who wanted to skirt the vaccines to get tested at a pharmacy. When the COVID-positive man opted to pay with his own credit card—which obviously did not match the health card of the man who wanted a positive COVID diagnosis attached to his—the pharmacy conducting the test reported them both.
Infectious-disease specialist Pier Luigi Lopalco said on Italian television that the COVID parties and other scams are against the law and people involved should be hunted down and arrested. “This uses the same logic as playing Russian roulette. For a person who has never had COVID, who has not been vaccinated, encountering this virus can mean a mild form of the disease, but it can also mean ending up in intensive care,” he said on Italian television. “The discriminating factor between these two occurrences, probably, lies in genetics. And there is nothing that can be done to know in advance.”
Then sleep through the day.🤣🤣🤣
🙏🙏🙏
Oh the poor thing, what ever will he do without his Swiss Chalet?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.