Posted on 11/27/2021 12:10:08 PM PST by SunkenCiv
"It has long been assumed that if there are a lot of deceased babies in a burial sample, then infant mortality must have been high," lead author Dr. Clare McFadden, from the ANU School of Archaeology and Anthropology, said.
"Many have assumed that infant mortality was very high in the past in the absence of modern healthcare.
"When we look at these burial samples, it actually tells us more about the number of babies that were born and tells us very little about the number of babies that were dying, which is counterintuitive to past perceptions."
The researchers examined United Nations (UN) data from the past decade for 97 countries that looked at infant mortality, fertility and the number of deaths that occurred during infancy. The analysis revealed that fertility had a much greater influence on the proportion of deceased infants than the infant mortality rate.
Because there is very little known about early human societies, the UN data helped the researchers make interpretations about humans from the past 10,000 years.
"Archaeology has often looked at the proportion of deceased infants to learn something about infant mortality. There was an assumption that nearly half, 40 percent, of all babies born in prehistoric populations died within the first year of their lives," Dr. McFadden said.
After analyzing the UN data, Dr. McFadden found no evidence to support this assumption.
(Excerpt) Read more at phys.org ...
“We” who?
Their idea of “prehistoric” is prior to the year 2000.
“We” who?”
The “experts” or maybe the scientist?
We’re reentering the prehistoric era
Until now I always assumed prehistoric moms hated their kids.
Well yeah....everyone on the planet has antecedents that protected their offspring....think Chinese "Tiger Moms" are tough...way back when they had cave bear moms.
Of of the DNA test companies says I have more Neanderthal DNA than 71% of the general population. You are posting about my ancestors!
But you knew it had to be done well or we wouldn’t be here.
Pebbles and Bam-Bam always seemed pretty healthy to me. Don’t these researchers ever watch TV?
Infants are so incredibly fragile that it seems impossible that they could survive and grow to adolescence unless they were cared for in an attentive and near continuous manner. This is so unlike primates and all other animals. Just more evidence in opposition to evolution.
UN data.. lol
Yeah but were they racist back then and were the gender woke?
I heard they cared more about moving up the corporate ladder than their children. They left them at day care centers with Neanderthals even...
Jeez I hate to think what day care centers were like back then.
Almost certainly spanked them when they acted up. Darwin took of those who tried other approaches.
Are they saying that prehistoric mom did not embrace gender fluidity, me-too movement, gay rights, animal rights, and the woke lifestyle?
Here’s the article’s money shot:
“The researchers would also like to see greater emphasis placed on the stories of women in past populations, which they say have long been neglected in favor of male stories.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
