Where are you getting this 'worship' thing from, you goofy man. You straight trippin' this morning, gassie.
Ivermectin is not a prophylaxis. It is at best a weak early treatment. Monoclonal sorry virtually stop the disease in its tracks. The literature on ivermectin is at best equivocal if one reads it instead of worships it.
Monoclonal are also an excellent post exposure prophylaxis. This plus a targeted therapeutic are exactly what the vaccine doubters want. The question is will you be intellectually consistent?
re: “It is at best a weak early treatment.”
IT boggles the mind; WHAT do you think already having it ‘in the system’ does?
Again, you’re just a ‘mind boggler’, defying both logic AND reason.
Where are you getting this 'worship' thing from, you goofy man. You straight trippin' this morning, gassie.
“ Ivermectin is not a prophylaxis. It is at best a weak early treatment. Monoclonal sorry virtually stop the disease in its tracks. The literature on ivermectin is at best equivocal if one reads it instead of worships it.
Monoclonal are also an excellent post exposure prophylaxis. This plus a targeted therapeutic are exactly what the vaccine doubters want. The question is will you be intellectually consistent?”
Ahh, GasBag is back with freshly relocated goalposts. I remember when all you did was shill the fake vaccines (actually gene therapy). Now, you attack Ivermectin in favor of monoclonal antibodies.
News flash oh dishonest one, those of us who are on to the vax fraud don’t have an issue with monoclonal antibody treatments. We also don’t have an issue with the niatonin protocols. We have issues with rushed and dangerous gene therapies that have not been tested, and were never successful in the past, doing dangerous things and harming people who are forced to take them. You know, like all of the animals they killed during earlier mRNA attempts.
It must suck to be so stupid that you end up supporting us while believing you are proving us wrong.
How many people did you kill this week? Last? Since covid started? Let’s see the numbers. Perhaps you can overtake Kevorkian