Posted on 11/14/2021 4:17:07 AM PST by MtnClimber
Fully on board with the project to bully the populace into receiving the experimental “vaccines” whose long term potential downsides are completely unknowable.
Alphabet, Incorporated, owner of YouTube, Google, and other tech media, has taken on the role of final arbiter of medical science, even in fast-changing fields where data if far from complete. YouTube, which enjoys a commanding presence in online video, is exercising is market dominance to prevent information of critical importance from reaching most people on the risks of adverse reactions to the pseudo-vaccines developed in hope of containing the Covid epidemic.
Zachary Stieber reports for the Epoch Times:
YouTube has again suspended Sen. Ron Johnson’s (R-Wis.) channel over a roundtable that featured people who say they were injured by COVID-19 vaccines and experts discussing the shots.
“For the 5th time this year, YouTube is censoring me from telling you the truth. This time they don’t want you to hear 3.5 hours of stories from doctors, scientists, and the vaccine injured,” Johnson said in a statement. (snip)
The roundtable stretched for nearly four hours. It included multiple people who say they suffered severe side effects from COVID-19 vaccines, including Theresa Long, an Army lieutenant colonel, and several experts, including Dr. Peter Doshi, an associate professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I wonder if GOOGLESTAPO/youtube have any legal liability for withholding data that could have prevented an injury or death?
Many of the online commentators and actual news sources that I follow have moved to Rumble. I am avoiding the censored wasteland of Youtube as much as possible. A few samples below:
https://rumble.com/c/StevenCrowder
https://rumble.com/user/Tracybeanz
https://rumble.com/c/RebelNews
https://rumble.com/c/RubinReport
It amazes me that the Right still tries to butt heads with liberal social media sites. After all this time, years of being censored doesn’t it make sense to post information to Right friendly sites? Hey here’s a thought buy up a bunch of small newspapers around the country, start an old fashioned wave of print pubs an start printing the truth on a weekly basis.
MtnClimber wrote: “I wonder if GOOGLESTAPO/youtube have any legal liability for withholding data that could have prevented an injury or death?”
I wonder if anti-vaxxers have any legal liability for misleading people into avoiding the vaccines resulting in injury or death?
When medicine, or in this case a vaccine, has to be promoted by lies and censorship, this alone is a reason to avoid it. In the final analysis, it’s really all we know for certain about the vaccine and for me it’s enough.
When I was in high school and college chemistry and physics I would have gotten into trouble for throwing out data that didn’t match my theory. Now only accepting data which confirms you hypothesis and actively censoring all other data is Science.
OK, does your agenda allow for working prophylactic protocols, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine?
If not, why not? Are you anti-science?
More than 17,000 healthy Americans are now dead due to this treatment ( it is in no way, shape, or form a vaccine, it is an untested genetic modification).
There will come a day when these “scientists” will be brought to justice.
I don’t know any anti-vaxxers who oppose informed consent. I oppose censorship of data that does not fit the narrative and use of force to mandate compliance with something that does not seem to work very well.
Good reference links list. I would also add this one, which I feel is the best and the one that doesn’t hold back at all with truthful information about everything:
https://rumble.com/c/StewPeters
Not just scientists, I hope.
Owners and major stockholders of Google, Facebook, etc, are complicit in crimes against humanity.
In the original Nuremberg trial there was only one major media figure: Julius Streicher (hanged)
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Julius-Streicher
Nuremberg II should have more.
“I wonder if anti-vaxxers have any legal liability for misleading people into avoiding the vaccines resulting in injury or death?”
That door swings both ways, Baby.
Weekly is too slow.
I predict that the failure of the Biden vax mandates will eventually lead to huge legal liability for companies and academic institutions- illegal termination, vaccine damages, etc. This will also be a major financial windfall for independent lawyers.— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) November 13, 2021
Thank you for that. Added to my bookmarks. And here’s one more for you.
https://rumble.com/c/BillWhittle
I wonder if anti-vaxxers have any legal liability for misleading people....
I wonder if you would have made the same stupid remark if you had seen that video of the “vaccine” injured.
Ceebass wrote: “I wonder if you would have made the same stupid remark if you had seen that video of the “vaccine” injured.”
You might want to watch some videos of those suffering from the virus.
You might want to watch some videos of those suffering from the virus....
How can you avoid it? It’s stuck in your face everyday.
Also, I had the virus and would rather endure it again then inject a toxic elixir that doesn’t work, injures many, and has unknown long term side effects.
Ceebass wrote: “Also, I had the virus and would rather endure it again then inject a toxic elixir that doesn’t work, injures many, and has unknown long term side effects.”
Can you explain why a pharmaceutical company would produce a ‘toxix elixir’ that ‘doesn’t work’? Poisoning your customers doesn’t sound like a viable business model.
And, don’t tell me that the pharmaceutical companies can do this because they have no liability. That’s absurd, criminal liability hasn’t been waived. The pharmaceutical companies would have to know their product is a ‘toxic elixir’ and doesn’t work, making the manufacture and distribution of this ‘toxic’ product a criminal act. There is no way they could successfully defend against criminal charges in court.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.