MtnClimber wrote: “I wonder if GOOGLESTAPO/youtube have any legal liability for withholding data that could have prevented an injury or death?”
I wonder if anti-vaxxers have any legal liability for misleading people into avoiding the vaccines resulting in injury or death?
OK, does your agenda allow for working prophylactic protocols, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine?
If not, why not? Are you anti-science?
More than 17,000 healthy Americans are now dead due to this treatment ( it is in no way, shape, or form a vaccine, it is an untested genetic modification).
There will come a day when these “scientists” will be brought to justice.
I don’t know any anti-vaxxers who oppose informed consent. I oppose censorship of data that does not fit the narrative and use of force to mandate compliance with something that does not seem to work very well.
“I wonder if anti-vaxxers have any legal liability for misleading people into avoiding the vaccines resulting in injury or death?”
That door swings both ways, Baby.
I predict that the failure of the Biden vax mandates will eventually lead to huge legal liability for companies and academic institutions- illegal termination, vaccine damages, etc. This will also be a major financial windfall for independent lawyers.— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) November 13, 2021
I wonder if anti-vaxxers have any legal liability for misleading people....
I wonder if you would have made the same stupid remark if you had seen that video of the “vaccine” injured.