rondo
November 12, 2021 11:30 am
Elements of Refusal
“Psychiatrist Norman Doidge, MD, has recently published a long, four-part article entitled Needle Points, in which he examines vaccine skepticism in America. The author, who got vaccinated “early and voluntarily,” is solidly pro-vaccine, yet he displays what is in these divisive times an unusual willingness to see the issue from the perspective of those with whom he disagrees.
I don’t want to default to critique in responding to the article, which I appreciate for its peaceful intentions, diligent historical research, lucid style, and willingness to bridge a steep ideological divide. Instead I will meet in good will its implicit invitation into dialog around the core question enunciated in its tagline: “Why so many are hesitant to get the COVID vaccine, and what we can do about it.”
https://charleseisenstein.substack.com/p/elements-of-refusal
Snoopy Says
November 11, 2021 7:02 pm
I would like for you to take note about who owns the PCR test before reading the following. You guessed it, the CDC referenced above for you. You know, the same test its investor sad not to use when testing for COVID.
Social News – COVID-19
PCR Tests (molecular)
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test runs cycles that amplify tagged DNA or RNA sequences, and the smallest contaminants can ruin the test completely. The amplification of DNA in PCR has to be initiated using short strands that are complementary to the target DNA, called primers. Keith Jerome, the head of virology at the University of Washington, points out that “primer design is still somewhat of an art, and not fully predictable.”
It should be noted that the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in this case is being used in emergency circumstances and, according to its inventor, Kary Mullis, was not designed as a tool to detect infectious disease.
(Continue Reading Here)
https://awareontario.nfshost.com/AWARE-Ontario/Issues/Soc_Miscellaneous/C19_PCR_Testing.htm
Last edited 17 hours ago by Snoopy Says
Mark