Skip to comments.
Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 10/31/21 Vol.378, Q Day 1465
qalerts.ne ^
| October 31, 2021
| FReeQs, FReepers, and vanity
Posted on 10/31/2021 9:04:04 PM PDT by ransomnote
HOLD THE LINE WHILE THE TIKI TORCH IDIOTS DANCE! Transcript of Riccardo Bosi's warning ["No consent. No consent. No consent"]
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation. Q describes this awakening as follows: "The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment). When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable. When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’. "Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma. When you are awake, you are able to clearly see. The choice is yours, and yours alone. Trust and put faith in yourself. You are not alone and you are not in the minority. Difficult truths will soon see the light of day. WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038) The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement. Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see. In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought. Where We Go 1, We Go All |
|
TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister; Conspiracy; Miscellaneous; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: 0lovefrkeywrdshills; 1trumpvaccine; 2thankyoutump; 3qplusvaccinated; alternatereality; bigfootisilluminati; givemeqorgivemedeath; ilovemyrabbithole; ilovethisplanwoohoo; imaginaryworld; imdonehangingon; itstheendtimeswoohoo; mentalillness; mysandboxnowgoaway; noqnoplanimfreenow; q; qbrainworm; qgotthevaxx; qhasspokenletuspray; qimtiredavengemenow; qisthebiglie; qlovesmehetoldmeso; qlownworld; qsromperroom; qtardfantasyland; qtownguyana; ransomnutgetsomehelp; scientologyday25185; thereisnoplan; thereneverwasaplanq; trustsessions; trusttheplanwoohoo; welcomelunaticfringe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,981-2,000, 2,001-2,020, 2,021-2,040, 2,041-2,058 last
To: bitt
I’m puzzled as to why this is news now, or what Project Veritas has to do with it. We saw those excerpts from the diaries on these threads a looooong time ago.
2,041
posted on
11/05/2021 12:38:40 PM PDT
by
17strings
(There are 2 means of refuge from the miseries of life, music & cats. - A. Schweitzer)
To: HoneysuckleTN
Nice to see the Arizona AG is asleep/slow-walking/intentionally dragging his feet on a lawsuit. And Brnovich thinks he’s going to be elected Governor. ha. ha. In fact, I think I need to send him an email....
2,042
posted on
11/05/2021 1:08:20 PM PDT
by
ponygirl
(An Appeal to Heaven )
To: bagster
Call me when you can ever arrive at the only 2 points of the complaint, dear.
P A C E (sluggish)
S E R I O U S C H A R G E S
2,043
posted on
11/05/2021 2:27:43 PM PDT
by
RitaOK
(Viva Christo Rey! Publik Skules/Academia -> The Farm team for more Marxists coming. Infinitum.)
To: Ymani Cricket
***AS it is turning out, PR Executive -1 seems to be Charles Halliday Dolan, Jr. Mr Dolan currently serves on the board of the
International Foundation for Electoral Systems***
Board of Directors:
Amb. J. Kenneth Blackwell, Chairman
Donald R. Sweitzer, Co-Chairman
June Langston DeHart, Vice Chairman
Thomas A. Devine, Vice Chairman
Amb. William C. Eacho, Treasurer
Randal Teague, Sr., Secretary
Wayne Allard
Kenneth Cutshaw
Hon. Irene Hadžiabdić
Hon. Steny Hoyer
William J. Hybl
Amb. Tom McDonald
M. Peter McPherson
Hon. Denise Nappier
Catlin O'Neill
H.E. Andrés Pastrana
Hon. Rob Portman
Daniel F. Runde
Amb. Theodore Sedgwick
2,044
posted on
11/05/2021 4:27:05 PM PDT
by
Bob Ireland
(The Democrap Party is the enemy of freedom.They use all the seductions and deceits of the Bolshevics)
To: rodguy911
2,045
posted on
11/05/2021 5:20:02 PM PDT
by
spokeshave
(We would be ahead by banning fossil fools, like Biden, Pelosi, Feinstein, Schumer, Leahy, etc.)
To: grey_whiskers
This kinda makes me sick.
2,046
posted on
11/05/2021 7:22:26 PM PDT
by
greeneyes
( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
To: RitaOK
Call me when you can ever arrive at the only 2 points of the complaint, dear. Ah, so this doom porn act of yours is just a ruse to get me to call you.
Get in line, sweetheart.
2,047
posted on
11/05/2021 8:14:52 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
2,048
posted on
11/05/2021 8:57:30 PM PDT
by
Unrepentant VN Vet
(Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? And I said, Here am I; send me.)
To: Steve Van Doorn
He is a profoundly evil man with an evil heritage.
2,049
posted on
11/05/2021 9:03:24 PM PDT
by
Kalamata
(BIBLE RESEARCH TOOLS: http://bibleresearchtools.com/)
To: little jeremiah
as opposed to 29 armed FBI agents knew where Roger Stone was and raided his house anyway.
2,050
posted on
11/05/2021 9:16:00 PM PDT
by
stylin19a
(I read where a dwarf was pickpocketed - how can anyone stoop so low)
To: little jeremiah
I wasn't quite right on this which is good for us. It puts the RATs feet to the fire which should scare those RATs up for re-election in the midterms.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/washington-secrets/gop-to-force-vax-mandate-vote-put-squeeze-on-moderate-dems"The OSHA rule came down yesterday, starting a near three-week period of review. During that time, Braun plans to take advantage of the process to call a vote, which will be decided by a simple majority."
Under congressional rules, a vote is guaranteed, and that is likely to pressure Democrats forced to choose a side on the federal mandate. “Moderate Democrats in the House and the Senate will have to put on record if they support this federal overreach putting people out of work in their states,” said a Senate aide. and this
2,051
posted on
11/06/2021 1:03:15 AM PDT
by
stylin19a
(I read where a dwarf was pickpocketed - how can anyone stoop so low)
To: little jeremiah
“ Not necessarily. If a red county delayed vote totals, waiting for Multnomah, it wouldn’t change anything unless the red counties had cheating methods at the ready.”
This “sort of” happened in Wisconsin with one of the Walker elections. One of the red counties reported their results officially, but the report they made to the media was missing a ton of votes. A big blue county then sent in their totals. Walker ended up winning and the left was pissed off that the red county gave the wrong totals to the media. The only reason that would matter is that they used the inaccurate totals as their guide on how many fraudulent ballots they needed, and the error left them short.
2,052
posted on
11/06/2021 6:26:05 AM PDT
by
BlueMondaySkipper
(Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)
To: BlueMondaySkipper
At this point, OR is so rotten, and so many other states like CA, that arrests are the only answer.
To: alligator
2,054
posted on
11/06/2021 8:29:12 AM PDT
by
BlueMondaySkipper
(Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)
To: RitaOK
Take a chill pill Eeyore.
Why is it that you do nothing but complain? People are (finally) getting arrested and here you are, still whining, Relax. Durham is methodically taking them down. This is exactly how these things work.
2,055
posted on
11/07/2021 9:49:35 AM PST
by
BlueMondaySkipper
(Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)
To: ransomnote
To: reed13k
Are you still in Aurora? Rita’s advice is good
2,057
posted on
11/11/2021 10:03:55 AM PST
by
DollyCali
(Don't tell God how big your storm is -- tell the storm how big your God is!)
ransomnote: Computer-generated transcript follows. These transcripts may contain phonetic errors and lack punctuation
this week in virology the podcast about
viruses the kind that make you
from microbetv this is twiv this week in
641 recorded on july 16th
2020 i'm vincent raqueniello
and you're listening to the podcast all
joining me today from austin texas rich
condit hi there vincent good to be here
and our very special guest today is the
director of the national institute of
allergy and infectious diseases dr
anthony fauci welcome back
thanks vincent nice to see you nice to
see you rich you were last on twitter
in 2013. boy have things have changed
yeah a little bit so we wanted to ask
a bunch of science questions about
kovid19 and we have we've put them in
little sections and this first section
is all about transmission and
and testing and i wonder if i could
start by asking what your thoughts are
on uh the relative contributions of
what we know are the three routes of
you know you know i don't think it's in
events that there's really
firm firm data there's the assumption
that it's mostly droplets you know just
recently there's been a buzz
about the degree of aerosol and what
um there's it's almost impossible to be
except when you have an event you might
recall very well the famous hotel in
sars where we had uh infections that
vertically and across the courtyard to
i mean that's a surefire aerosol if
there ever was one but when you have
both droplet and regular aerosol
uh you know it's tough to distinguish
as an intelligent guess that it is
a very large majority of it is the
aerosol wears if you stay i mean the
which is if you stay six feet or more
that the droplet will reach you but i
rule out the possibility that there is a
degree of aerosol the extent of which i
stay on surfaces hard enameled steel
plastic more than corrugated cotton
material and things like that
you know a study that was done by
vincent munster from the rocky mountain
showed about you know 48 to 72 hours on
surfaces but that's pcr-able we're not
replication competent so that's another
up in the air yeah so no firm
information on what we're talking about
any feeling for like the relative
droplet uh uh transmission
and surface mediated fomite mediated
you know i don't but if you look at the
of when crowds are together you would
you would imagine it's mostly droplet
and i'm sure if somebody coughs into the
hand and opens the door if somebody
and opens the same door that it you know
you're gonna get transmission but i
would think that it's again if you
surface to droplet i would go with
it seems to me this is important because
it speaks to the effectiveness of masks
all right there have been a number of
shed viral rna for weeks as determined
doesn't seem to be infectious virus and
the real question is are they a threat
for transmission and i'm wondering
if you think we could use a cut off of
viral loads determined by pcr to say
is no longer infectious can go home can
because right now the the physicians are
really having a hard time with that
right again a good question and what is
sort of uh evolving into a bit of a
that if you get a cycle threshold
of 35 or more that the chances of it
being replication competent are
so that if somebody and you know we do
we have patients and it's very
for the patients as well as for the
somebody comes in and they repeat
their pcr and it's like 37
cycle threshold but you never if you
threshold cycle so i think if somebody
38 even 36 you got to say you know
it's just it's just dead nucleotides
yeah because as you know we can't easily
culture infectious viruses you don't
have a bso3 lab everywhere
exactly exactly okay so is the the
uh is reporting that a pretty standard
practice and doing a diagnosis now
rather than just positive or negative
okay good yeah i mean if when you go in
when i get my test you know it's
negative when someone comes in and it's
they don't give them the threshold until
you go back and ask for it
okay but they they've got it they've got
what's your current uh perspective on
the fraction of transmission now
that's either asymptomatic or
pre-symptomatic versus symptomatic
you know richard i know you're gonna
you asked that yeah i like these
there's no right or wrong answer because
but we can guess so long as we don't
take our guesses too seriously
so you know i think it has to be
substantial uh if you combine
asymptomatic with pre-symptomatic i
think if you put them together
and you look at the circumstances in
it's spread you get individual
instances like what happened on the
nuclear aircraft carrier where you had
a few symptomatic sailors and a thousand
got infected i can't imagine
richard that one symptomatic person
coughed on a thousand people and
it would almost have to be a substantial
carriage and transmission okay
particularly relative to schools opening
stuff in the news that implies that some
think that children uh either acquire or
the virus somehow differently than
and i'm wondering if there's really any
yeah good question i think that's one of
i mean really i i don't think that there
conclusive evidence either way i mean
it's out there that or certainly
don't get sick nearly as much as right
as adults the question is do they get
and if so do they transmit right as you
important relevance to school opening
so the answer is we don't know
but what we're doing we have a study
that we started on may 1st
called the hero studies human
and i forgot what the other things stand
for but it's going to be 6
families looking at the rate of
the transmissibility to parents and
and whether or not they get sick and
what their antibody response is okay
good so we we should know the answer to
soon as opposed to just guessing because
my my uh impression is that in the
uh understanding that kids don't get
sort of misinterpreted or extrapolated
to the school system to say well
since they aren't getting sick then
putting them together back in school is
i don't that's not a logical conclusion
from the fact they don't get sick right
you're right you're right
you know on our podcast twiv we get lots
teachers who want to know what's the
safest way to open schools in the fall
so how can we do that in a safe way get
you know vince it's it's really i think
to address that that that question i i
generally take in multiple steps so
just give me 30 seconds i'll go quickly
is that i think a fundamental principle
should be that to the best of your
given the circumstances which i'll get
to in a second you should try and get
because what we're seeing is that the
you know the the downstream uh
deleterious consequences ripple effects
of kids not being in school for the kids
for the parents for society
can be substantial so if you make your
we're going to try and get the kids back
to school having said that
it varies greatly where you are
you know we we tend to sometimes think
and when when foreign countries and and
look at the united states they tend to
look at us as a uni-dimensional country
as you guys know it's a big country and
it's really different geographically
so there may be some counties where heck
send the kids back to school don't worry
about anything and then there are other
areas where there's enough infection
you gotta decide either it's not safe to
get the kids back to school or
if it is you've got to do things that
risk and that could be alternate day
classes morning afternoon wearing masks
protecting the vulnerables it's not one
to a question it depends on a number of
but the one thing that's critical is
that if you're that the first thing is
you have to be attentive to and
the safety and the welfare of the
children and the teachers
and the teachers the reason i say and
because you could have the situation
where you decide you want to bring the
and the teachers don't want to come back
i mean i think that's a reality that
so we're seeing uh in austin we're
demonstrations from teachers saying hey
we're here too yeah yeah so
it seems to me that testing should be a
uh getting back to school and yesterday
michael minna from the broad institute
is a champion of the idea of having a
one dollar daily saliva based
antigen test and he thinks it can be
done with our amazing manufacturing
you ever thought about that and uh is
that ever going to happen
well you know maybe not specifically
what he spoke about but something along
is really what is needed is something
that you could essentially do as many
want it's instantaneous you get the
answer bingo you're done i mean we
really do need that i mean it would
alleviate a lot of anxiety number one
it would be an important public health
tool i mean if you could do that
before you send a group together into a
class or a group together into a factory
i mean how great would that be knowing
that at that given moment
everybody was negative right
yeah this game in our conversation
yesterday this came down to
uh sensitivity questions okay uh
because he's talking about uh tests that
uh generally are less sensitive than pcr
but he says they don't have to be that
as we've already discussed in in in some
too sensitive so if you can catch most
of the really high virus load with uh
even a test that's not as sensitive that
that may be sufficient to really
significantly mitigate absolutely as an
example of don't let the perfect be the
enemy of the good really yes interesting
so we've seen uh reports from here and
notion that the virus may cause a
systemic infection certainly there are
okay but there have been reports
indicating that the virus itself may
cause at least a small viremia
or actually infect the vasculature
or the kidneys or even the brain and i'm
uh take on that situation whether it's
confined as a respiratory virus and
sequelae a secondary or whether the
you know my sense richard is that the
although we don't have you know
overwhelming proof that that's the case
downstream distal effects of things that
are essentially respiratory
but what we are going to i believe get
are autopsy studies so if you start
seeing virus in different organs
that answers your question right there i
mean if you do autopsies and you see
endothelium and kidneys that have virus
or liver or brain that's it it's it's an
okay and we're we're awaiting those
sorts of studies is that we are
we are okay all right uh and what's your
current best guess as to an infection
you know in the very very beginning of
this i wrote a perspective in the new
england journal of medicine
and i figured it was somewhere about one
it's totally dependent on the number of
you know it could be five times a
level if you're not counting all the
you know given just the ballpark back of
look at what goes on you know
it's got to be it's got to be you know
more than seasonal flu but it's it's not
sars which was 10 or like mares which is
it's got to be somewhere around 1 i
that fools people you know there are two
the ultimate impact of an outbreak a how
many people get infected and b
how many die so if you get a few people
you know with a with a very high death
die but if you get a lot of people
with a reasonably low death rate a lot
of people are going to die right
so you know it's tough to calculate
because of the asymptomatics
so uh and let's talk a little bit now
immunity and and vaccines what's your
best estimate for the cereal prevalence
uh in the u.s i know it's going to vary
depending on where we are but overall
where do you think we are well new
so right away you're you're leading the
uh because they really suffered terribly
i feel so badly about that you know i
think it's probably a few percent
three four percent something like that
that's what i think it probably is
so we're way way far from herd immunity
uh so uh that raises the question
can uh hurt immunity actually be
achieved without a vaccine this spanish
study came out and one of the reactions
wasn't even going to happen you know
i got my feeling is rich that if if
if we want to get hurt immunity
purely on the basis of infection
vaccine an awful lot of people are going
and boy do i not want to see that i
don't want to see herd immunity that we
because we had 70 percent of the people
got infected and a whole bunch of people
got really sick that's the reason why
you know getting that vaccine as quickly
so uh along the same line and this
hurt immunity and this is one that i'm
confused about is uh reports that
and i'm interested in your perspective
or your perspective on what fraction of
that immunity wanes how fast
and and whether or not reinfection
at a significant rate and what the
consequences of reinfection are is it
because you still have partial immunity
that's a lot of questions but i know but
they're very much related so usually i
when somebody gives me five questions
it's okay i'll remind you
no but i think i can now because they're
so you know when you look at the history
of coronaviruses the benign
go back in the old papers in the
the four common cold coronaviruses
the immunity did not last that long you
know it was lasting you know six months
and that's the reason why people think
you get reinfected with coronaviruses
so that's the answer to the first
question what percentage of people get
immunity i think a hundred percent get
i guess the question is what percentage
lasts a reasonable period of time
and the answer to that is we don't know
but the reason we don't know for this
is that we're only six months into the
so if you really want to get a good
landscape view of what it is you got to
get wait a year or two and see
what happens answer your second question
is is it possible then if your immunity
wanes that you get re-infected
of course the question is if you get
do you have a sub-optimal immunity
that then causes enhancement which is
i think buried in your question does it
make it better or does it make it worse
i don't think there was any any evidence
though i'm not sure people
looked in the common cold coronaviruses
if people get infected a second time
with the coronavirus do they get a worse
cold as it were so i don't know the
answer to that so that that's a big
i'm kind of hoping this is a i'm kind of
uh maintain some partial level of
immunity and actually get a milder
well i would hope so my goodness yeah
but no data no no like you say it's too
it's too early it's too early well you
the current i environment does everyone
wants an answer yesterday right
yeah you know everyone wants an answer
you say i don't know they say well give
yeah give them a guess they come back
they say you were wrong that's right
that's right so uh this notion of waning
that does that uh have any impact on
your perspective on how a vaccine might
not no not how it might work it's
whether you need to get boosted
okay yeah two or three i mean if you
we just not we but the group that did it
my team but i'm not personally involved
published two days ago in the new
england journal of medicine the phase
and you know it really does look good i
mean you don't want to put all your
50 45 patients this is the moderna
yeah the mrna so if you look at the the
the immune response in a moderate dose
100 micrograms which was the moderate
you get pretty robust neutralizing
wild-type virus to the tune of as
high as or even higher than convalescent
so at least for a finite period of time
i think we're going to get a good
how long it lasts we don't know
but you know i don't say this in a
flipping way i'll worry about that later
let me worry now about whether you can
over a season and if you can and the
immunity wanes then we'll worry about a
it seems to me that most not all but
are focused on the spike protein and we
twiv and we'd love to get your
perspective do you think that's a good
not pay attention to all the other viral
it's a loaded question vince um
the answer is if you look at um
you know theoretically and conceptually
the neutralizing antibody that blocks
that binding to the ace ii
i mean classically that's the way you
think that antibodies to other
uh components are unimportant
but i think that against the spike
is really i you know vince we had this
about hemoglobin versus nuclear protein
versus neuraminidase with flu you know
and that's still a bit of an unanswered
even though you'd like to get it at the
hemoglobin i think the spike protein
it works it correlates with animal
protection so it all really looks pretty
although i do notice that one of your
warp speed candidates does have a few
viral proteins in there which is good
do you know why immunity wanes
this speaks to the same question because
if if immunity wanes because the virus
tinkers with the immune system then
maybe that isn't an issue
for uh for a vaccine or or uh maybe it
maybe it is you know it gets back to
what you were saying about
viremia you know if this is truly
a respiratory borne infection i would
think that the immune response
would be weaker and would not last long
enough if you get somebody
you know what i would really like to see
you know as they evolve over the next
i want to take somebody who gets
gets up a respiratory infection a little
and then gets better versus somebody
that's in the hospital in an icu
with multi-system disease and find out
if the systemic descent dissemination of
really gives you immunity that that is
years worth as opposed to months worth
really interesting question okay so
uh immunity relative to the sort of the
pathogenesis of their individual disease
that's interesting okay i i think that's
you know the the viruses that give us
the best durable immunity are the ones
that are systemic like measles and polio
and i don't know maybe smallpox too
oh yeah i mean that's really durable
so uh tony what uh we have these uh
these things called warp speed and
active uh which are selecting vaccines
um upfront um payment and production
can you can you provide any insight as
being selected or like what are the
criteria why are you why are you picking
a public-private partnership of people
from different agencies of the
government as well as outside outside
who we bring together for the purpose of
doing just what you indicated of doing
prioritization of agents prioritization
making sure that the resources are are
adequately and appropriately divided
among the different priorities
the operation warp speed is more of an
operational group that is looking at
diagnostics therapeutics and vaccines
right now on on therapeutics and
to actually get involved in the the
conduct not that warp speed
conducts anything our group other groups
do it but to sort of outline
these are the protocols these are the
things that are going to match we've got
to harmonize the protocols
common database common dsmb
common immunological parameters common
primary and secondary endpoints
that all goes through warp speed more at
whereas active is more of a think type
think tank type prioritization okay and
obviously complementary functions then
and talking to each other
oh all the time yeah i mean they
intimated the boxes yeah they over the
then participating in these decisions
about what the lead candidates are
absolutely absolutely and what are the
you know the criteria are what it looks
maybe in animal studies uh what the need
for the disease like for example i i'll
a really good example so we have two
that seem to work well in improving
discharge or mortality dexamethasone for
people needing oxygen it's no good early
rem death severe better early on because
so what we really need right now are
that operate early on that prevent a
sick person from going to the hospital
those are the ones we want to do so we
hyperimmune globulin direct antivirals
monoclonal antibodies all those have
been prioritized and are all going into
clinical trials right now
that was on the basis which of all
deliberations about prioritizations
okay is it safe to say that in terms of
uh an an anti-viral approach a vaccine
therapeutic diagnostic there's never
oh for sure i mean this is you know i
don't like the word warp speed
because it makes it look like you're
to to do things in the way we've done it
is truly remarkable it's remarkable for
somebody like me who's been doing this
for 40 years and have been involved in
the development of a bunch of vaccines
you know get the the pathogen isolate it
grow it up then and doc inactivate it
here you know the the the sequence came
on january 10th i called a meeting in
room that we're in right now of our
let's go all hands on deck we got to
start developing vaccine the next day
we had a meeting by phone with moderna
put it into the mrna now we're on the
five days have gone by amazing 62 days
we were in a phase one trial and then
five months later we're gonna start a
at the end of july that's mind-boggling
that's that's orders of magnitude more
quickly than we were doing
a decade ago so uh a question we get a
uh vaccine production and deployment i
mean even if we get a successful vaccine
are we going to be able to deploy it to
enough people soon enough what's
what's the horizon there no the horizon
what what we have is that we're doing
not at risk to the patient not at risk
to the scientific integrity
but at risk to the money so what happens
is that the federal government has
hundreds of millions of dollars per
and sometimes over a billion dollars
per candidate to have the companies
proceed at risk in other words instead
determining if you're successful here
then determining if you're successful
here it's like you invest
right ahead you prepare the sites you do
you start making doses even before you
that the vaccine works which means that
you've saved many months if it doesn't
you've lost a lot of money so the
dictates that it's worth investing the
to save a lot of time so the companies
i can't promise you personally because
that's not what i do i can get you
the vaccine and i'll tell you if it
the companies will say that they will
enough vaccine by the first quarter of
to be able to start distributing tens if
not hundreds of millions of doses
incredible yeah i mean with the modern
i've been trying to get my head around
yeah and how to make it really i know
it's tough are we good let's go we're
they're telling me we got one more
question because i gotta run to the next
i have one more question then so we all
this in fact the last twit you were on
worry about at night and you said are we
ready for the next big one
and i would guess you're probably
thinking we weren't ready enough
but i'm wondering you know part of the
in academia which is where we are we
can't work on viruses that aren't
circulating and infecting people it's
hard to get support for that
so do you see after this pandemic
a change maybe in the direction of niad
we could have extramural funding for
basic science on emerging pathogens that
a little bit too risky uh for the normal
you know vince you probably are aware
that we've already done that
even before covert 19. you know we had a
of prototype pathogens platform
and pre-selected microbes we put a fair
so we've been doing that what i think is
we i think set the example to do that
now the congress realizes
that for the next one we've really got
so i am seeing i hope fingers crossed an
infusion of a lot of money
into this type of preparedness that
all right the last thing i want to say
is i want to thank you personally for
that you have done and i i probably
speak for rich condit and many
uh of us virologists out there we're
200 behind you and we look forward to
for many years to come thank you for
joining us today dr fauci
yeah absolutely thank you appreciate it
always good to be with you guys
thank you thank you thanks so much they
well that is a fabulous twiv
641 what do you think rich i just
i love that guy you know and i love
being able to talk to him like this as
the real tony fauci uh on this he's a
he's a scientist and he's a clinician he
he cares deeply about the science and he
cares deeply about the people
and about uh getting us done right and
i don't know he's not afraid to say it's
uh you know it's just a great person and
a great scientist and it's a privilege
share some time with yeah we we really
him taking the time to join us
i guess we are a bona fide thing and
wow of course he was on twit uh back in
2013 as you heard uh yeah that's uh
something you need to put in the show
notes or even up front in the show
but at least here that seven years ago
we spent a whole hour with him in his
uh definitely worth listening to i
re-listen to it it gives his whole
um which is uh actually quite
interesting yeah the history of his
aids epidemic uh and winds up with that
ringer question what keeps you up at
this the big one yeah i know i think
it's uh it's a it's an interview you
find anywhere else basically so yeah
who does our interviews right uh this is
641 you can find the show notes at dot
slash twitter that will include the
the old podcast send your questions and
microbe dot tv if you like what we do
consider supporting us microbe dot tv
our guest today of course from the
allergy and infectious diseases was dr
rich conditt rich conditt
is an emeritus professor university of
florida gainesville currently residing
in austin texas thank you rich you're
quite welcome i'll say it again it's a
i feel very grateful for being able to
bad for retirement right i'll tell you
just rocks i never i never thought i
would do this much science in retirement
and it's some of them that's some of the
best and most interesting science i've
ever done from my chair with a
headset on yeah we'll keep you busy
great stuff great stuff i'm vincent
dracanello you can find me at
virology.blog i'd like to thank the
virology and the american society for
microbiology for their support of twiv
for the music this episode was recorded
edited and posted by me vincent
you've been listening to this week in
virology thanks for joining us we'll be
END
Click to skip to the top of this long post.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,981-2,000, 2,001-2,020, 2,021-2,040, 2,041-2,058 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson