[adorno]

We have plenty of evidence from past vaccines

Irrelevant.

We had an emergency needing a quick solution, and the data for the solution was also irrelevant when the solution is what mattered most.

[bagster]

We had an emergency needing a quick solution, and the data for the solution was also irrelevant when the solution is what mattered most.

And the people dead from the vax appreciate it very much.

[Robert DeLong]

We had an emergency needing

We absolutely did not have an emergency need, for HCQ was what it was purported to be, when combined with zinc and azithromycin, and that would be a far more an effective medicine to use against the virus, and it was far cheaper as well. So your irrelevant comment is totally bogus. The vaccines have caused more deaths than the virus, because the virus was over-hyped with bogus fear-mongering to begin with. Especially since those who died were all chalked up as having died of Covid, when the vast majority did not even have Covid at all. Keep believing the lie if you want the world to continue down the path to a one world communist government run world

Wake up man, the world has been lied to. Time to accept that reality. Was it dangerous to people with comorbidities, obesity, and diabetes? Absolutely, but the recovery rate was between 98 & 99.9%. Which is actually better than the flu.

[grey_whiskers]

You’re lying through your teeth.
There was no emergency.

78% of the deaths are in those over age 65; most of those had 2 or more comorbidities, and the average age of death of COVID “deaths” is greater than the average lifespan.

So no threat.

And HCQ/Zinc and/or Ivermectin (given EARLY — none of this “go home till you turn blue and come in and let us put you on a ventilator to blow out your lungs and give you remdesivir which takes out your kidneys” crap) have up to an 87% success rate.

So alternative treatments anyway.

Troll.