Posted on 09/27/2021 9:10:04 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The Biden-Harris regime and mainstream media have been gaslighting Americans for months. They’ve classified everyone who is against the Covid-19 injections as “Anti-Vaxxers.” This is obviously not true, at least it should be obvious to anyone who isn’t indoctrinated by Pandemic Panic Theater.
Dr. Robert Malone, a developer of the mRNA technology used in the Pfizer and Moderna injections, has been one of the loudest voices of opposition to the current set of vaccines as well as draconian vaccine mandates. For this, he has been blacklisted by the press, censored on Big Tech, and ostracized by the mainstream medical community. He has been classified, like many of us, as falling into the “Anti-Vaxxer” category.
This is ludicrous prima facie, and he pointed out why on Twitter:
once again – I am not an "antivaxxer" (a term that I loathe). I am pro- bioethical, safe, effective and appropriately targeted vaccine development and deployment. SARS-CoV-2 vax for high risk persons. Not universal vax.
— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) September 27, 2021
“Just to be clear, so there is no confusion; I am involved in both second gen SARS-CoV-2 vaccine development as well as repurposed drug development for COVID-19. Four clinical trials starting shortly. Three large treatment trials (high dose famotidine + celecoxib) and one vax Ph1.
“Once again – I am not an “anti-vaxxer” (a term that I loathe). I am pro-bioethical, safe, effective and appropriately targeted vaccine development and deployment. SARS-CoV-2 vax for high risk persons. Not universal vax.”
This is what many of us deal with on a daily basis. If they had come out with properly tested vaccines that demonstrated high levels of effectiveness in developing immunity to Covid-19 and those vaccines had limited side-effects similar to previous FDA-approved vaccines, many vaccine-skeptics would have no problem getting jabbed. What has been delivered are drugs that are still in the middle of their testing, have been less effective than any vaccines we’ve seen in history, and pose exponentially more risks of adverse reactions than all previously approved vaccines combined.
The push for universal vaccinations has reached cult-like adherence by vaccine-nannies across the globe. That fact alone should concern people since the Covid-19 vaccines have been mediocre at best in regards to defending our bodies against the disease. If they worked, Covid-19 would never have seen a spike in populations that are over 80% vaxxed. They can torture the numbers but they have no answers for the lack of positive results being delivered.
Just because someone opposes medical tyranny and is skeptical of experimental drugs that do not deliver the immunity that was promised and that pose unambiguous risks of adverse reactions, that doesn’t make them an “Anti-Vaxxer.”
***Same here. These experimental MessengerRNA gene therapy sequences are NOT vaccines, they are at best TREATMENTS -- they do not halt the spread of the virus and would never have been approved as treatments.
This is one of the big lies. “It just a vaccine like for polio or smallpox”
No, this is a brand new type of vaccine rushed thorough the development process and not subjected to basic medical, and legal, safeguards
Ration people have every right to be dubious. They have the historic record on their side. Here are some example of high pressure vaccinations programs like this failing.
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?
storyId=121480816
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2009/04/swine-flu-cases-recall-1976-episode
This is a real challenge—opposing these new experimental vaccines and not being anti-vax. I’ve had the same conversations with many folks and even here on FR find it necessary to repeatedly draw the distinction. I and my family have all of our normal, traditional vaccinations. We are not anti-vax. But the experimental Covid vaccinations are an entirely different matter. People like to lump everyone together—anti-vax want us so they don’t sound like a bunch of kooks that they are and everyone else wants to lump us with the anti-vax to discredit us as kooks.
Powerful article! Thank you.
Same as me, I’ve taken many vaccinations over the last 7 decades.
But I’m not taking the current ones.
That's fine but he's not a bioethicist, a public health professional nor an epidemiologist so he's way out of his expertise lane.
I think it should be added that it was announced at the Covid Summit last weekend in Rome that Dr. Malone is part of a group that is producing its own COVID vaccine called RelCovaxTM. He also was vaccinated with the current mRNA vaccine so he could continue his overseas traveling and consulting work. If you watch the video he did with Bret Weinstein, he discusses his own vaccination and problems he has with the current ones on the market.
Video is available here:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/censored-dark-horse-podcast-bret-weinstein-robert-malone-inventor-mrna-vaccine-technology/
That’s fine but he’s not a bioethicist, a public health professional nor an epidemiologist so he’s way out of his expertise lane.
—
Perhaps you missed the part that Dr Malone developed the mRNA delivery system. And who uses a term like staying in you “lane”... except those on the Left who insist only person X can talk about X; one is not allowed to have knowledge or a learned opinion outside your particular credentialed degree.
Being a lab scientist doesn't necessarily qualify you to make public health recommendations.
Dr. Malone took the Moderna jab. I was surprised to hear him say that during an interview. The reason he took it was that he wanted to travel.
That’s fine but he’s not a bioethicist, a public health professional nor an epidemiologist so he’s way out of his expertise lane.....
You’re a moron. You would reject Einsteins theory of relativity because it was written by a patent clerk.
This is a real challenge—opposing these new experimental vaccines and not being anti-vax......
Don’t worry about it. The term “anti-vax” refers to nothing more than snarky name calling by vaxed suckers who have nothing left but a failed temporary prophylaxis.
The dude’s been making millions for decades as a professional enabler of DoD, etc., gain-of-function bioweapon research.
Is a limited hangout better than nothing? Sometimes, I guess, yes—but often no.
I don’t believe what the dude says. He’s as Deep State bioweapony as they come.
Weinstein and wife are midwit limited hangouts.
Madam Theophilus wrote:
“I think it should be added that it was announced at the Covid Summit last weekend in Rome that Dr. Malone is part of a group that is producing its own COVID vaccine called RelCovaxTM. He also was vaccinated with the current mRNA vaccine so he could continue his overseas traveling and consulting work. If you watch the video he did with Bret Weinstein, he discusses his own vaccination and problems he has with the current ones on the market.
Video is available here:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/censored-dark-horse-podcast-bret-weinstein-robert-malone-inventor-mrna-vaccine-technology/
“
On what is RelCovaxTM bases; is it a traditional type shot, or is it mRNA-based but addressing the whole virus?
First link is bad; here’s the working one:
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=121480816
Not necessarily, but I'd want something more than his opinion as a patent clerk. Maybe some equations and experimental results?
That's how you demonstrate expertise.
Some here think Malone is an expert in all things Covid because he understands mRNA and vaccinology.
I don't think that's necessarily so.
Maybe some equations and experimental results?
Ever hear of E=mc^2?
But go ahead and get your “vaccine” info from public health types like fauci. I prefer to get mine from the scientist who originated them.
You know nothing of expertise you condescending twerp.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.