Posted on 09/19/2021 8:01:40 AM PDT by Enlightened1
New VAERS numbers are out.
701,559 Adverse Events
60,741 Hospitalizations
80,393 Urgent Care
6,637 Heart Attacks
5,765 Myocarditis
1,862 Miscarriages
19,210 Disabled
14,925 Deaths
100% Safe and Effective
https://openvaers.com/covid-data
https://twitter.com/CatHaven04/status/1439414638177923072
The COVID death rates are inflated. VAERS numbers are deflated.
Our kids were trying to persuade us to get the jab...
😱
Glad you passed.
firebrand wrote: |
Many on this site are publicizing VAERS to everyone who would like to prove the vaccines are unsafe. Most people don’t realize that there are penalties for false reports, and even if they do realize it, there are ways around being caught. Remember that Free Republic is seen by at least 100,000 people a day, and probably much higher, and the vax issue is highly politicized. We should all remember that when viewing VAERS numbers, which could very easily be vastly inflated. |
VAERS numbers are vastly under reported. The following is an excerpt from Steve Kirsch's (and his team) report, followed by the thread it's taken from on Free Republic.
For the current COVID vaccines, our team is extremely confident that we can meet all the Bradford-Hill criteria for causality using VAERS analysis alone. Will our statisticians and VAERS experts be permitted to meet with any ACIP members to discuss the data?
For example, it is well established that a clear dose dependency relationship can be used to satisfy one of the Bradford-Hill criteria. Because two of the vaccines are multi-dose vaccines, a Dose 1/Dose 2 ratio analysis shows a very clear signal. Sadly, this type of analysis is currently being completely ignored by the CDC.
ransomnote: More at the link. The entire 34 pages of text are posted in the thread, and the thread is linked to a convenient free PDF download. Kirsch and 20 experts simply slay the lies with which we've been bombarded. Truly an oustanding article - share it will everyone you know!
Comment to ACIP meeting of August 30, 2021 submitted by Steve Kirsch (with 20 experts including Dr Malone, Dr. Vanden Bossche, Dr. McCullough, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Fareed
skirsch.com ^ | August 30, 2021 | Steve Kirsch
PS: Kirsch and his group have offered 1 million dollars to anyone who can refute their analysis which indicates that in reality, the post Covid 'vaccine' death toll is realistically 150,000 people.
You’ve got to love this part:
One day under 66 years of age, the booster is too dangerous for you and you can’t have it. One day later you turn 66 and now you must get this booster, it’s the only thing that can save you!
Your logic is flawed if some of the adverse reactions appear later in the game.
First, 45% of Americans 6 and over get a flu shot every year:
That would easily eclipse COVID vaccination totals in 2 years.
THAT IS JUST THE FLU SHOT!
Your ‘poetic’ description of people using the reporting system says more about your desire to demagogue the issue than have a real discussion.
I’m not for censorship at all.
But I don’t rely on VAERS for data anymore.
I my world view, nothing should be censored, except by the general public.
I mean if I had a Blog about bread crumbs on the counter from the toaster………I would be censored by the public by way of not coming to my Blog, not sharing it, not recommending it.
I secretly read some of the reports, there are some very humorous reports made. LOL
In the past, vaccines were taken off the market if there were 25 deaths.
THere is no longer 25 deaths, so there is no precedent for taking any vaccine off for 14,925 deaths. Therefore, carry on...
Sounds to me you are speculating by saying "could", and you do not even know yourself. So why say something is false without even verifying it first? I am not interested in fake news. This post is from a tweet on Twitter (social media) discussing the latest CDC VAERS report. Social media is where millions of people can see it, talk about it, etc... Found it interesting and thought it was worth the discussion since it is in the public domain. We do have 1st Amendment, and have a Right to have an opinion.
These are numbers from the CDC per the link. If you are saying the VAERS numbers on the link (https://openvaers.com/covid-data) are false, then can you can you please link us the correct VAERS report with all the valid numbers? I'll be happy to ask the administrator/moderator to take down this thread. I am not interested in fake reports.
My understanding is the VEARS is the public facing report. The CDC gets the information from doctors and nurses around the country that are treating their patients. It is 1 of several reports the CDC uses. From what I read these numbers only represent between 1 to 10%, and it's not an inflated number. Did the CDC say these numbers are inflated and not real? Where did you get 75%?
The VAERS report has been around for decades, and has never been an issue. Almost everyone I know that have questions about this mRNA gene therapy believe in vaccines and have had vaccines. Questioning a gene therapy does not automatically makes someone automatically anti-vaccine as you are implying.
Remember this virus has 99.9% recovery for the unvaccinated. People are wondering why they are being bum rushed like a used car salesman trying to pitch you a lemon. If you watch the news it's like a 24 hour infomercial, and we never hear an open discussion about it. Most likely because many of their commercials are from Big Pharma and they do not want to upset their advertisers.
Glad we passed too, you can’t get un-vaccinated.
“ All you vaccinated people under 65 who can’t get a booster, your vaccine “protection” has either worn off (otherwise why a booster?) or will soon wear off.
What are you going to do then?”
——————————————————————————————
Great point, it shows how important it is to have a free choice in getting vaccinated and or any medical care.
Well, I don’t need a booster. So I will not get a booster or be concerned about one.
That’s what I’m going to to do.
I had presumed Covid early on, before there were test available in my area. That’s why it is “presumed”.
I did get the Pfizer vaccines so I think I’m good and don’t need more.
But you see, I can make that choice. I can decide for myself just like you and everyone should be able to decide.
Forcing vaccines is a dangerous slippery slope as it’s against Constitutional Rights and can lead to other forced medical procedures.
So I’m making a choice, you are making your choice. God Bless you and all of America.
Have a great day.
“We should all remember that when viewing VAERS numbers, which could very easily be vastly inflated.”
total bullshit. past studies of VAERS data pretty much show they’re likely to be at lease ten times lower than actual events ... reporting is difficult and many don’t bother reporting ... i personally know two cases of serious myocarditis, one of which was hospitalized, and neither was reported ...
Thanks for the insight. Times certainly have changed whe 3 deaths halted Swine flu.
SWINE FLU PROGRAM IS HALTED IN 9 STATES AS 3 DIE AFTER SHOTS
By Harold M. Schmeck Jr. Special to The New York Times
Oct. 13, 1976
Yes, I know. My post was made in jest.
And so was mine :-)
I believe you are a bit slow.
People make up heart attacks?
Airline pilots give up $200,000 salaries at a job that they love so they would do it for free?
People have learned how to fake Bell’s palsy?
Heavens, they even fake death!
This is from the FDA meeting last week. Listen to what these Doctors are saying. This is why people have concerns.
Start at about 4:20. I have linked it for you to save you time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFph7-6t34M&t=15684s
“I did get the Pfizer vaccines so I think I’m good and don’t need more.”
Thanks for the response.
Where did you get that idea? I thought the “protection” wears off after 5 months. If the protection lasts, why was the booster ever produced, it’s not needed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.