Please post a physical / biochemical mechanism by which nucleocapsid proteins are thought to cause harm.
The idea that they have been added to later versions of the jab (or that mRNA instructing human cells to make them) might be an on-the-sly belated admission that using the spike protein alone was not conferring sufficient immunity for long enough.
grey_whiskers wrote:
“Please post a physical / biochemical mechanism by which nucleocapsid proteins are thought to cause harm.
The idea that they have been added to later versions of the jab (or that mRNA instructing human cells to make them) might be an on-the-sly belated admission that using the spike protein alone was not conferring sufficient immunity for long enough.”
1) If nucleocapsid proteins were added later, would they show up in the Comirnaty ingredient list?
2) If nucleocapsid proteins were added later, would those later Pfizer BionTech, Moderna, & J&J shots have greater efficacy against the virus?
As to 2) above, how does one explain the breakthrough cases?
Need to know how long ago those folks got their shots.
| grey_whiskers wrote: |
Please post a physical / biochemical mechanism by which nucleocapsid proteins are thought to cause harm. The idea that they have been added to later versions of the jab (or that mRNA instructing human cells to make them) might be an on-the-sly belated admission that using the spike protein alone was not conferring sufficient immunity for long enough. |
*
Forgive me for I have committed the sin of answering queries out of order and I'm now lost *fetches compass from sled*
I probably shouldn't speculate as much as I did. When I said it's possible the vaccines change over time, possibly capsid/no capsid, that was just putting ideas on the table to remind myself not to assume the 'vaccines' are in any way stable over time.
I see you have an interesting idea - that they may have self-conciously boosted 'sufficient immunity for long enough'. It's possible.
I may be too cynical, but I think the vaccines never had any efficacy and that post - wherein I speak of Doshi's work exposing a likely 19% efficacy at the 2 month mark falling to nothing as time progresses, is here.
And Doshi's work is here:
He and others were not able to get raw data, as is usual for lab work (it's expected for legitimacy). And Doshi noted that Pfizer just ignored around 3000 cases of 'suspected' Covid and counted only around 200 cases of PCR positive for Covid, to get their fake efficacy rates.
As to your request for the mechanism - I'll have to see if I have saved links for that. I think it was a team of German researchers who identified the mechanism for clotting in Astrazeneca.
I just made a first pass looking for that German research and didn't find it. I'll dig more later.
I did find some other links in my notes that make me wonder. I think the 'discovery' that the 'vaccine' spike proteins were damaging was actually a strategy in which white hat researchers seized upon black hat fear porn portraying Covid (disease) as the end of life as we know it. Brilliant strategy - not unlike another appropriation strategy done by white hats (substituting in a benign virus).
So the black hat research wants people to think if they get Covid their veins will be lacerated and that Covid is primarily a cardio illness. I think that is graphene oxide in use prior to vaccine rollout. I don't believe the Coronas cause massive clotting - it's never happened before. So somehow or other - the black hats go about creating what they call Covid cases (GO) with extensive lacerations to veins (my theory - possible graphene platelets).
Then White Hat researchers yell, "REALLY?" They publish papers that say, "Well, you are saying spike proteins lacerate veins and that Covid-19 is a coronary disease. Why would you put those spike proteins in the vaccine? Haven't you just proven that's what's causing the bleeding/clotting in vaccinated people who haven't had Covid?"
Okay maybe they weren't that dramatic, but would you prefer to read a dry research paper without the drama? Would you?
So here's an example of the white hats appropriating research performed by black hats on Covid to question the safety of Covid vaccines -all done very professionally.
"Covid-19 is primarily a disease of the vascular system (The vascular system, also called the circulatory system, is made up of the vessels that carry blood and lymph through the body.) and not the respiratory system. The main culprit is the spike protein. (Spike protein–“a glycoprotein that protrudes from the envelope of some viruses” Merriam-Webster “Like a key in a lock, these spike proteins fuse to receptors on the surface of cells, allowing the virus’s genetic code to invade the host cell, take over its machinery and replicate.” Bruce Lieberman) If Covid-19 is primarily a vascular disease and if the main instrument of physical damage is the spike protein, then why are we injecting people with billions of spike proteins?"
New Study Confirms: The COVID Shot Spike Protein is Dangerous (freerepublic.com)
FWIW: This is the dichotomy I see. I personally suspect graphene oxide and other additives mimic a disease of the cardiopulmonry system (potentially fatal), and some have the additional burden of the seasonal flu and other respiratory diseases, making it still harder for people to breath, and it all gets classified as Covid with a fake test, none of it is treated if the CDC can help it. And yes, the CCP/Cabal wouldn't pass up putting gene modificaiton mRNA into 'vaccines', as Moderna says, to create a new 'operating system' for people. I just doubt that part is respiratory or cardio though.
Anyway, back to the topic at hand:
The white hats caught the black hats off guard, right when the black hats were still assuring the public the spike proteins were the same between vax and Covid disease and would trigger identical antibodies.
The black hats had been scrubbing evidence that the antibodies were different. But with the attack of the white hat researchers, suddenly 'the same' means 'but different' and the black hat researchers blustered, "Well NOT the nucleocapsid! We're not that dumb! No one would do THAT!"
And then Dr. Flemming asked, 'how is it those who never had Covid, but have the vax, have antibodies to the nucleocapsid?"
Ohhh...ah...I just went to skim an article to link here, because it's the deep state paying defense of the spikes (nothing to see her, 'interpret more carefully,' and then 'move along).
But, this quote stopped me:
"Notably, inducing inflammation in the mice with lipopolysaccharide (LPS; a bacterial toxin) treatment further enhanced the brain uptake of spike proteins. This is because the inflammation had disrupted the blood-brain barrier integrity, making it more permeable to foreign invaders."
This has been about the blood brain barrier all along. The PCR test rubs a test swab on the 'firewall' to the brain in the nasal cavity for no reason, as the virus is easily available in the mouth (saliva test).
I found several 2018 research papers in the NIH PubMed, all of which were done by Chinese researchers, testing to see how each of 8 to 10 metal ions interacted with graphene oxide. Then some white hats said they found some of those contaminants, in addition to one manufacturer's 'vaccine' having parasites. I wondered, 'why parasites'? This isn't an accident.
Well, those parasites could 'disrupt the blood-brain barrier integrity, making it more permeable to foreign invaders.' I swear the variation in the toxins, parasites across the four major brands of Covid vaccines makes me think they are testing the human population and modifying their experiement, testing to see which approaches work best to cross that blood brain barrier, and other 'effects'.
Last Sidenote, I swear: At the link, some researchers reveal with some surprise that we can have an immune response, including neutrophils, but to a 2 dimensional object (graphene oxide) instead of bacteria or a virus.
I think the research at the link, if crossed with statements by Dr. Yeadon and some by Doctor McCullough about neutrophils and macrophages could explain why both they, and the researchers in the linked video/transcript, are looking at the same thing and seeing it differently (biology vs chemistry). If interested, you can skip the details and just check the 3 numbered excerpts I provide.
Graphene Oxide Interactions With Innate Immune Cells
I can't find the rest of the links I was looking for. I am retreating for now, but vowing to organize my notes/links better.