grey_whiskers wrote:
“Please post a physical / biochemical mechanism by which nucleocapsid proteins are thought to cause harm.
The idea that they have been added to later versions of the jab (or that mRNA instructing human cells to make them) might be an on-the-sly belated admission that using the spike protein alone was not conferring sufficient immunity for long enough.”
1) If nucleocapsid proteins were added later, would they show up in the Comirnaty ingredient list?
2) If nucleocapsid proteins were added later, would those later Pfizer BionTech, Moderna, & J&J shots have greater efficacy against the virus?
As to 2) above, how does one explain the breakthrough cases?
Need to know how long ago those folks got their shots.
Or if they had natural infection; depending on the timing, you see.
Original antigenic sin from the shots where the body in response to a new threat, just makes its already known antibodies it made for the jab, makes it less likely, (but does it rule it out?) that getting exposed to COVID in the wild after the jab, that you will produce a lot of nucleocapsid antibodies.
If you got exposed to the coof (but had no symptoms or only mild ones), maybe you have natural nucleocapsid antibodies from that, which showed up on later testing.
And we have to be careful of the language. Do they mean literally “nucleocapsid proteins *themselves* were added to the jabs? Or do they mean mRNA instructions for building nucleocapsid proteins were added to the jabs?
In either case, it don’t think it’s been either suggested, or demonstrated, that nucleocapsid proteins themselves cause symptoms in the human body (except generalized immune response/inflammation) — as opposed to the spike proteins, which directly cause clotting, bind to ACE2 receptors even if the modified ones produced by the jab can’t *enter* the cell; or interact with CD147 receptors in cardiac tissue to cause myocarditis and/or cardiomyopathy, etc.
(The nucleocapsid proteins are, as it were, “internal” to the virus and enclose the nuclear material; unlike the spike proteins which are the proteins from the virus which directly act on human cells.)
Please post a physical / biochemical mechanism by which nucleocapsid proteins are thought to cause harm.
The idea that they have been added to later versions of the jab (or that mRNA instructing human cells to make them) might be an on-the-sly belated admission that using the spike protein alone was not conferring sufficient immunity for long enough.”
1) If nucleocapsid proteins were added later, would they show up in the Comirnaty ingredient list?
2) If nucleocapsid proteins were added later, would those later Pfizer BionTech, Moderna, & J&J shots have greater efficacy against the virus?
As to 2) above, how does one explain the breakthrough cases?
Need to know how long ago those folks got their shots...........
This discussion is fascinating and educational. Thank you for all the effort and research. I don’t know how you all research such a technical topic. Not in my wheel house.
My question pertains to GO (graphene oxide). I understand that GO is nasty stuff. That it can degrade the bloods ability to supply the body and organs with oxygen. Also causing blood clots. So the Vaxx companies are not giving everyone the same vaxx with the same ingredients, correct? Some get placebo, some EO, some get snake venom kidding, but you get the point. This structured like one big giant drug trial. So if to take the Vaxx it’s the lot of the draw. I read that Japan identified three different questionable ingredients in their shipment. It seems to my the Vaxx is the ticking time bomb. We wont know the scope of destruction for a few years down the road.
On another note American Front Line Doctors must have caught up because I have been help and prescription written inside 7 days. Funny the CDC is saying HQC and zinc is effective against COVID.