|
Posted on 09/13/2021 8:08:52 PM PDT by ransomnote
Click to read the post which motivated me to create the image below..
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Hi -
So sorry you are having trouble with getting the meds you ordered. There is a doc here in T-town who is prescribing Ivermectin and I think hydroxycholorquine. Also I had heard that Front line docs would prescribe through Publix, but it has been 6 weeks or so I think since that news crossed my radar. Praying for your husband !
Until COVID “Cases” never included anyone without symptoms.
Until COVID “Diagnosis” were never based on a test deliberately cycled up into a very high false positive rate, often in the total absence of symptoms.
Until COVID “Deaths” were people who died OF a disease, not people who died WITH that disease.
Until COVID Hospitals were never paid any bounty for reporting cases of a specific disease, let alone handsomely rewarded for certain treatments of any disease.
Until COVID case and fatality data seldom spiked of Fridays, to be panic reported right before the weekend, only to be quietly retracted over the weekend.
Until COVID we actully had a flu season, there were essentially zero flu cases last flu season (its worth noting that the over-cycled PCR “Gold Standard” COVID test is incapable of distinguishing between COVID and the flu!).
Until COVID new epidemic strains of diseases were named after their point of origin (or in some cases, such as Spanish Flu, or Marburg Hemorrhagic fever, where they were first described) COVID both originated in and was first described in Wuhan China, at the gates of a PLA run virloogy lab. No one can say that out loud!
*************************************8
It occurs to me that it would be great if some enterprising 18-year-old h.s. senior plagiarized the above (but in a good way and probably with the blessings of the author) and used it as part of a speech before a school board meeting and brought a bunch of his or her friends as a cheering section.
He or she could then say something along the lines that if he or she at a young age can recognize this b.s. for what it is, others twice as old should too and it doesn’t say much for them if they can’t.
And then remind the board members that at 18, he or she can vote, as can many of those cheering, or at least they will be able to pretty soon.
Maybe one doesn’t have to be 18 to speak at a school board meeting. I really don’t know.
Aren’t a lot of school board elections at some other time of the year, like May, versus November?
A lot of 17 year olds will be 18 by then.
Sounds like a class action for “fiduciary incompetence (neglect)”.
Willful and knowingly.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
that makes sense cletus.
the question is how long after the recall election will it take to bring charges, investigate, audit, litigate...........
Yeah that’s gone absolutely viral and waking some more people up. Total propaganda backfire. Demonstrates that vaers doesn’t even scratch the surface
Keep taking the vitamins, zinc and Quercetin.
Other than a really pathetic juvenile attempt to garner Q/FR esteem, your ‘point’?
Shocking Report: Covid Spike in Ultra-Triple-Vaxxed Israel Is WHY Dear Leader Biden Enacted Medical Dictatorship
Below cited within above:
Biden Covid team sees vaccine efficacy waning in unpublished data from Israel
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/09/14/covid-israel-data-vaccine-efficacy-511777
Cornell University sees significant rise in COVID-19 ‘cases’ despite 95% jab rate
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cornell-university/
Fauci Botched the AIDS Epidemic so Big Pharma Could Profit. He’s Doing It Again With COVID.
Overcoming depression in a fallen world
https://www.christianpost.com/voices/overcoming-depression-in-a-fallen-world.html
The Myth That Hurricanes Are Getting Worse [Because of Climate Change]
Covid: 54 percent of hospital patients in Ireland are fully vaccinated
Five For Fighting Has Just Released A New Song About Biden, Afghanistan And The Taliban
I Now Regret It: Immunologist Voted For Biden, Dislikes ‘Draconian’ Mandates
https://mydailyfreedom.com/regret-immunologist-voted-biden/
The Beginning Of Accountability: WHO Scientist Charged With Mass Murder
Just parachuting in blind: HOLY CARP!!!!
CNN ????
Milley TREASON????
????CNN?????
https://youtu.be/wcGUVBJgZnE
Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite. This article is currently FREE to read and share without paying.
The National Institutes of Health provided a non-recommendation for the use of ivermectin in COVID-19, stating that there was:
“insufficient evidence … to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19.”
The process for reaching that non-recommendation, however, is opaque. The Panel members responsible for therapy recommendations are disclosed and also that:
“… working groups propose updates to the Guidelines based on the latest published research findings and evolving clinical information.”
However, NIH has gone to extreme efforts to avoid stating whether a vote was held to endorse the ivermectin non-recommendation. This includes fighting a Freedom of Information Act request in federal court. A deceptive non-vote would constitute an atrocity. NIH has also been secretive about the composition of the working group that proposed the ivermectin non-recommendation. The names of those individuals were redacted by the NIH from a document obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request for the agenda of a meeting considering ivermectin.
However, the group responsible for the ivermectin non-recommendation has been discovered through a FOIA request to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The FOIA response shows that the working group has nine members. Three members of the working group, Adaora Adimora, Roger Bedimo, and David V. Glidden, have disclosed a financial relationship with Merck. Merck has campaigned against the use of ivermectin in COVID-19. A fourth member, Susanna Naggie, had an extraordinary potential conflict of interest. She received a $155 million grant for the study of ivermectin following the non-recommendation. Funding for the study would have been difficult to justify if the drug was recommended for use in COVID-19. It is not known, however, if the panelist was aware of that opportunity or was planning to apply for that grant at the time of the deliberations on ivermectin.
The deception and secrecy surrounding the NIH ivermectin non-recommendation should have raised serious doubts about its integrity. The grotesque conflicts of interest of Panel members should make it clear that the NIH, as the FDA with its slandering of ivermectin as a “horse dewormer,” should not be taken seriously.
https://trialsitenews.com/grotesque-conflicts-of-interest-on-nih-ivermectin-non-recommendation/
Many thanks for posting that!
what else were they going to use the shot passport for?
(no captions, plus accent = not able to understand them)
ThankQs, CtC, for those links!
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3994658/posts?page=308#308
pingout and note this one:
The Beginning Of Accountability: WHO Scientist Charged With Mass Murder
ThankQs CtC, for the links!
pingout,
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3994658/posts?page=198#198
and this one:
Sure sounds like OSHA’s going to have a hard time enforcing Biden’s federal vaccine mandate
thankQs, HoneysuckleTN, for the links!
pingout
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3994658/posts?page=235#235
especially these:
— Atlantic article highlights new study that demonstrates that half of all covid hospitalizations were for mild or no symptoms, and often for another reason altogether
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/09/covid-hospitalization-numbers-can-be-misleading/620062/
— Zoom call leaked where North Carolina hospital managers are talking about how to fudge the data to scare unvaccinated people about covid
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/megan-fox/2021/09/13/watch-video-shows-hospital-staff-plotting-to-scare-the-public-on-covid-19-n1478281
— Michigan hospitals say people with natural immunity to covid don’t need vax
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/michigan-hospitals-say-workers-with-natural-immunity-can-ignore-vaccine-mandate/
— Teenage boys are six times more likely to have serious cardiac event from vaccine than from covid
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/teenage-boys-6x-likely-suffer-heart-problems-covid-vax-hospitalized-coronavirus/
— Biden coughs and sputters in speech “supporting” Gavin Newsom
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/09/13/watch-biden-has-coughing-fit-at-gavin-newsom-rally-in-california/
— Israeli Health Minister caught saying that vaccine passports are only there to pressure the unvaccinated to get vaccinated
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/caught-hot-mic-top-israeli-health-minister-admits-vaccine-passports-intended-pressure-unvaccinated-get-vaccinated-video/
— Poll shows strong opposition towards Biden’s vaccine mandate for businesses
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/09/13/nolte-top-pollster-has-terrible-news-for-bidens-fascist-vaccine-mandate/
— DeSantis to fine businesses $5,000 for complying with Biden’s vaccine mandate
https://thepostmillennial.com/desantis-slams-biden-admin-for-vaccine-mandates-announces-5-000-fine-for-businesses-who-participate
— Kamala goes full retard with vaccines in latest tweet
https://www.theblaze.com/news/kamala-harris-tweet-calling-for-protecting-the-vaccinated-raises-eyebrows-isn-t-that-what-the-vaccine-is-supposed-to-do
27 was the last number I saw, yesterday.
Chuckster wrote:
“Just parachuting in blind: HOLY CARP!!!!
CNN ????
Milley TREASON????
????CNN?????
https://youtu.be/wcGUVBJgZnE
“
what timestamp; CNN is nauseating to watch (yes, it has captions...)
Darnright wrote:
“
Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite. This article is currently FREE to read and share without paying.
The National Institutes of Health provided a non-recommendation for the use of ivermectin in COVID-19, stating that there was:
“insufficient evidence … to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19.”
The process for reaching that non-recommendation, however, is opaque. The Panel members responsible for therapy recommendations are disclosed and also that:
“… working groups propose updates to the Guidelines based on the latest published research findings and evolving clinical information.”
However, NIH has gone to extreme efforts to avoid stating whether a vote was held to endorse the ivermectin non-recommendation. This includes fighting a Freedom of Information Act request in federal court. A deceptive non-vote would constitute an atrocity. NIH has also been secretive about the composition of the working group that proposed the ivermectin non-recommendation. The names of those individuals were redacted by the NIH from a document obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request for the agenda of a meeting considering ivermectin.
However, the group responsible for the ivermectin non-recommendation has been discovered through a FOIA request to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The FOIA response shows that the working group has nine members. Three members of the working group, Adaora Adimora, Roger Bedimo, and David V. Glidden, have disclosed a financial relationship with Merck. Merck has campaigned against the use of ivermectin in COVID-19. A fourth member, Susanna Naggie, had an extraordinary potential conflict of interest. She received a $155 million grant for the study of ivermectin following the non-recommendation. Funding for the study would have been difficult to justify if the drug was recommended for use in COVID-19. It is not known, however, if the panelist was aware of that opportunity or was planning to apply for that grant at the time of the deliberations on ivermectin.
The deception and secrecy surrounding the NIH ivermectin non-recommendation should have raised serious doubts about its integrity. The grotesque conflicts of interest of Panel members should make it clear that the NIH, as the FDA with its slandering of ivermectin as a “horse dewormer,” should not be taken seriously.
https://trialsitenews.com/grotesque-conflicts-of-interest-on-nih-ivermectin-non-recommendation/
“
pinging this one out; this is big news. 4 out of 9 people on that board had massive conflict of interest with Big Pharma.
what a nest of vipers.....
I’ve seen short vids of school board meetings with 8 yr olds speaking.
It starts right out of the gate. The video runs 11 minutes. Of course they are trying hard to spin it but there is no getting around it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
